Home Classical, Ancient Near Eastern & Egyptian Studies The Wife of Ischomachus and the Two Aspasia in Xenophon’s Oeconomicus
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Wife of Ischomachus and the Two Aspasia in Xenophon’s Oeconomicus

  • Etienne Helmer
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Women in the Socratic Tradition
This chapter is in the book Women in the Socratic Tradition

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to make sense of the enigmatic mention of Aspasia in Xenophon’s Oeconomicus (3.14), my claim being that it is decisive to understand the status of Ischomachus’ wife. Since the 1980s, the main interpretations of Ischomachus’ wife have been characterized by their feminist approach, and their polarization between a radical position and a more moderate one. According to the former, Ischomachus’ wife is described as subordinate to her husband and bound to interior domestic tasks without access to political life outside the oikos. According to the latter, Xenophon represents this woman as endowed with a certain power within the domestic sphere, as well as a certain autonomy of judgment for being able to mock Ischomachus, to criticize him and sue him.

In the wake of this latter reading, my alternative hypothesis is that the enigmatic reference to Aspasia in the Oeconomicus serves to convey agency to Ischomachus’ wife, making her a female Socratic character within the oikos, that is, a female character endowed with virtues and skills typical of the portrait of Socrates by Xenophon, and that are required to be a good domestic administrator. More exactly, I suggest that Aspasia refers both to that concubine of Pericles who shares similarities with Socrates in terms of pairing things and commitment to truth, and to a possible, although much more hypothetical, reference to a concubine of Cyrus known for her virtue.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to make sense of the enigmatic mention of Aspasia in Xenophon’s Oeconomicus (3.14), my claim being that it is decisive to understand the status of Ischomachus’ wife. Since the 1980s, the main interpretations of Ischomachus’ wife have been characterized by their feminist approach, and their polarization between a radical position and a more moderate one. According to the former, Ischomachus’ wife is described as subordinate to her husband and bound to interior domestic tasks without access to political life outside the oikos. According to the latter, Xenophon represents this woman as endowed with a certain power within the domestic sphere, as well as a certain autonomy of judgment for being able to mock Ischomachus, to criticize him and sue him.

In the wake of this latter reading, my alternative hypothesis is that the enigmatic reference to Aspasia in the Oeconomicus serves to convey agency to Ischomachus’ wife, making her a female Socratic character within the oikos, that is, a female character endowed with virtues and skills typical of the portrait of Socrates by Xenophon, and that are required to be a good domestic administrator. More exactly, I suggest that Aspasia refers both to that concubine of Pericles who shares similarities with Socrates in terms of pairing things and commitment to truth, and to a possible, although much more hypothetical, reference to a concubine of Cyrus known for her virtue.

Downloaded on 2.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111692456-007/html
Scroll to top button