Home Classical, Ancient Near Eastern & Egyptian Studies Aristippus’ View of Women: Misogyny or Theoretical Tension?
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Aristippus’ View of Women: Misogyny or Theoretical Tension?

  • Giovanna De Paoli
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Women in the Socratic Tradition
This chapter is in the book Women in the Socratic Tradition

Abstract

Aristippus, the founder of the Cyrenaic school, is primarily known through secondary sources that describe his radically somatic hedonism. While often criticized for being excessively selfish and indifferent to others, there are anecdotes suggesting a different side. For instance, Aristippus once faced humiliation to aid a friend at Dionysius’ court. His interactions with women also present a complex picture. Some accounts depict him as treating women as possessions or negatively, while others highlight his challenges to societal norms, such as adopting feminine attire or cohabitating with Laïs, a hetaira. Remarkably, his daughter Arete inherited and led the Cyrenaic school, teaching her son and earning recognition as a philosopher in her own right – an unconventional role for a woman at the time. This arrangement contrasts with the misogynistic views with which Aristippus is sometimes associated. In this work, I explore whether Aristippus’ seemingly disdainful attitudes toward women were specific or reflected broader theoretical tensions in Cyrenaic philosophy. I argue that the controversy surrounding Aristippus underscores a deeper theoretical challenge: reconciling radical bodily hedonism with social interactions.

Abstract

Aristippus, the founder of the Cyrenaic school, is primarily known through secondary sources that describe his radically somatic hedonism. While often criticized for being excessively selfish and indifferent to others, there are anecdotes suggesting a different side. For instance, Aristippus once faced humiliation to aid a friend at Dionysius’ court. His interactions with women also present a complex picture. Some accounts depict him as treating women as possessions or negatively, while others highlight his challenges to societal norms, such as adopting feminine attire or cohabitating with Laïs, a hetaira. Remarkably, his daughter Arete inherited and led the Cyrenaic school, teaching her son and earning recognition as a philosopher in her own right – an unconventional role for a woman at the time. This arrangement contrasts with the misogynistic views with which Aristippus is sometimes associated. In this work, I explore whether Aristippus’ seemingly disdainful attitudes toward women were specific or reflected broader theoretical tensions in Cyrenaic philosophy. I argue that the controversy surrounding Aristippus underscores a deeper theoretical challenge: reconciling radical bodily hedonism with social interactions.

Downloaded on 1.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111692456-012/html
Scroll to top button