Home Classical, Ancient Near Eastern & Egyptian Studies Female and Feminine in Plato’s Symposium
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Female and Feminine in Plato’s Symposium

  • Cristina de Souza Agostini
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Women in the Socratic Tradition
This chapter is in the book Women in the Socratic Tradition

Abstract

In the Symposium, discussion about the nobility and vileness of human females, as well as the feminine, is not sporadic. It appears in praise of Eros, in various mythical references and, more specifically, in the speeches of Phaedrus, Pausanias, and Aristophanes. In effect, the guests’ presentation of Eros exaggeratedly confers superiority to both men and the masculine through the pederastic relationship, while belittling the erotic influence of women and practices characterized as feminine. In a certain sense, Phaedrus, Pausanias and Aristophanes agree that all aspects of the virtuous character are more eminent in men; hence, all relationships involving females or goddesses of maternal origin do not participate from men’s sphere of activity to guarantee the supremacy of masculine virtue. Thus, considering that the figures of Alcestis, Aphrodite, Dione and primordial nature are fundamental to understanding the meaning of Eros in the non-Socratic perspective of Phaedrus, Pausanias and Aristophanes, I intend to demonstrate, first, how the terms male/masculine and female/feminine are used in the encomiums of the aforementioned guests; and, second, how this distinction is fundamental to the philosophical role of Socrates as a midwife of logoi.

Abstract

In the Symposium, discussion about the nobility and vileness of human females, as well as the feminine, is not sporadic. It appears in praise of Eros, in various mythical references and, more specifically, in the speeches of Phaedrus, Pausanias, and Aristophanes. In effect, the guests’ presentation of Eros exaggeratedly confers superiority to both men and the masculine through the pederastic relationship, while belittling the erotic influence of women and practices characterized as feminine. In a certain sense, Phaedrus, Pausanias and Aristophanes agree that all aspects of the virtuous character are more eminent in men; hence, all relationships involving females or goddesses of maternal origin do not participate from men’s sphere of activity to guarantee the supremacy of masculine virtue. Thus, considering that the figures of Alcestis, Aphrodite, Dione and primordial nature are fundamental to understanding the meaning of Eros in the non-Socratic perspective of Phaedrus, Pausanias and Aristophanes, I intend to demonstrate, first, how the terms male/masculine and female/feminine are used in the encomiums of the aforementioned guests; and, second, how this distinction is fundamental to the philosophical role of Socrates as a midwife of logoi.

Downloaded on 1.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111692456-019/html
Scroll to top button