Home Philosophy A puzzle of motivation: Greco-Roman echoes in Sahagún’s Historia general de las cosas de Nueva España
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A puzzle of motivation: Greco-Roman echoes in Sahagún’s Historia general de las cosas de Nueva España

  • Hendrik Lorenz
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The Historia general de las cosas de Nueva España was written in what is now Mexico in the second half of the 16th century by a team of researchers, most of them Nahua, under the directorship of the Franciscan friar Bernardino de Sahagún (1499-1590). It is an encyclopedia of Nahua belief and knowledge concerning religion, astronomy, morality, commerce, the fauna and flora of Nahua lands, and much else. It is an important source of knowledge about Nahua culture and history. But the work also presents a puzzle of motivation: on the one hand, Sahagún treats pre-Hispanic Nahua culture as a moral and spiritual disease, which it is the task of Catholic preachers and confessors to cure with the aid of the record that he himself provides in the Historia. On the other hand, much of the Historia offers a sympathetic, even at times strikingly respectful record of Nahua culture and knowledge. Greco-Roman echoes and comparisons abound on both sides of this puzzle: in describing indigenous Americans as barbarians and as morally and spiritually primitive, Sahagún draws on the Aristotelian tradition of dehumanizing and infantilizing non-Greeks; at the same time, he constructs an elaborate comparison that likens pre-Hispanic Americans to populations of the Greco-Roman world, namely Trojans, Romans and Carthaginians, and in so doing, he ascribes various highly prestigious cultural achievements to pre-conquest American populations. In the paper, I propose both an interpretation of the complex function of these comparisons in Sahagún’s colonialist agenda, and a solution to the puzzle of what that agenda actually consists in.

Abstract

The Historia general de las cosas de Nueva España was written in what is now Mexico in the second half of the 16th century by a team of researchers, most of them Nahua, under the directorship of the Franciscan friar Bernardino de Sahagún (1499-1590). It is an encyclopedia of Nahua belief and knowledge concerning religion, astronomy, morality, commerce, the fauna and flora of Nahua lands, and much else. It is an important source of knowledge about Nahua culture and history. But the work also presents a puzzle of motivation: on the one hand, Sahagún treats pre-Hispanic Nahua culture as a moral and spiritual disease, which it is the task of Catholic preachers and confessors to cure with the aid of the record that he himself provides in the Historia. On the other hand, much of the Historia offers a sympathetic, even at times strikingly respectful record of Nahua culture and knowledge. Greco-Roman echoes and comparisons abound on both sides of this puzzle: in describing indigenous Americans as barbarians and as morally and spiritually primitive, Sahagún draws on the Aristotelian tradition of dehumanizing and infantilizing non-Greeks; at the same time, he constructs an elaborate comparison that likens pre-Hispanic Americans to populations of the Greco-Roman world, namely Trojans, Romans and Carthaginians, and in so doing, he ascribes various highly prestigious cultural achievements to pre-conquest American populations. In the paper, I propose both an interpretation of the complex function of these comparisons in Sahagún’s colonialist agenda, and a solution to the puzzle of what that agenda actually consists in.

Downloaded on 26.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111561448-014/html
Scroll to top button