Home Linguistics & Semiotics A theory for a usage-based cognitive lexicography
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A theory for a usage-based cognitive lexicography

  • Paolo V. DiMuccio-Failla
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Our theory merges usage pattern lexicology (in the English tradition) with cognitive lexical semantics. Its main objective is to describe and explain conventional (non-creative) everyday language production by studying normal word usage patterns (WUPs), first introduced by Sinclair and later adapted to automated natural language processing by Hanks. We defend Sinclair’s thesis that normal WUPs constitute (univocal) extended lexical units, and also Hanks’s insight that WUPs of verbs are co-determined by their argument structures and semantic preferences, selected from a consistent taxonomy of concepts. Accounting also for extralinguistic, purely cognitive pattern features, we make a conjecture about the way WUPs activate conceptual structures in our minds. We adapt Brugman and Lakoff’s radial networks of word meanings to our theory, and also incorporate Langacker’s schematic model of a lexical network, while arguing that his reservations about its cognitive reality are not justified when dealing with extended lexical units. We highlight the role that collocations play in such radial networks of schematic trees and propose a pragmatic mechanism driving the conventionalization of univocal WUPs. We also show that normal WUPs can be represented in a standardized way, and propose a method to identify them by evaluating their naturalness/idiomaticity. A theory of definition is currently in development. In appendix, we present two full entries of our phrase-based active dictionary (PAD)1, one in English for the verb agree2 and one in Italian for the verb seguire. Some features, like lexical functions, are not yet implemented.

Abstract

Our theory merges usage pattern lexicology (in the English tradition) with cognitive lexical semantics. Its main objective is to describe and explain conventional (non-creative) everyday language production by studying normal word usage patterns (WUPs), first introduced by Sinclair and later adapted to automated natural language processing by Hanks. We defend Sinclair’s thesis that normal WUPs constitute (univocal) extended lexical units, and also Hanks’s insight that WUPs of verbs are co-determined by their argument structures and semantic preferences, selected from a consistent taxonomy of concepts. Accounting also for extralinguistic, purely cognitive pattern features, we make a conjecture about the way WUPs activate conceptual structures in our minds. We adapt Brugman and Lakoff’s radial networks of word meanings to our theory, and also incorporate Langacker’s schematic model of a lexical network, while arguing that his reservations about its cognitive reality are not justified when dealing with extended lexical units. We highlight the role that collocations play in such radial networks of schematic trees and propose a pragmatic mechanism driving the conventionalization of univocal WUPs. We also show that normal WUPs can be represented in a standardized way, and propose a method to identify them by evaluating their naturalness/idiomaticity. A theory of definition is currently in development. In appendix, we present two full entries of our phrase-based active dictionary (PAD)1, one in English for the verb agree2 and one in Italian for the verb seguire. Some features, like lexical functions, are not yet implemented.

Downloaded on 23.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111545943-003/html
Scroll to top button