Home Classical, Ancient Near Eastern & Egyptian Studies Fact and Fiction in Pliny’s Epistles: The Augustan Poetry Book and its Legacies
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Fact and Fiction in Pliny’s Epistles: The Augustan Poetry Book and its Legacies

  • Roy K. Gibson
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Pliny stands at the intersection between epistolary (biographical) fiction and fact. He is routinely studied by two academic constituencies whose critical assumptions do not necessarily align: ancient historians and literary critics. Statements about biographical fiction in Pliny often proceed from unargued assumptions about ‘how literature works’ - assumptions generally derived from study of the Augustan poets. I argue that assumptions about autobiographical fiction in Ovid cannot simply be transferred to Pliny. We need to construct individual theories for individual authors, working from the text up to personalized theory, rather than from generalized theory down to text. The Augustan poetry book is central to the development of Latin letter collections (in sharp contrast to the lack of influence from poetry books on the Greek epistolographical tradition). But the poetics of the two Roman forms are fundamentally different. In Ovid’s Amores, the signifier is centripetal and returns to reflect on its own programmatic status within a collection; but Pliny’s letters are centrifugal and generally move outwards from internal signifier to external signified. Prospects for reading events in Pliny’s life as primarily instantiations of a literary programme are diminished.

Abstract

Pliny stands at the intersection between epistolary (biographical) fiction and fact. He is routinely studied by two academic constituencies whose critical assumptions do not necessarily align: ancient historians and literary critics. Statements about biographical fiction in Pliny often proceed from unargued assumptions about ‘how literature works’ - assumptions generally derived from study of the Augustan poets. I argue that assumptions about autobiographical fiction in Ovid cannot simply be transferred to Pliny. We need to construct individual theories for individual authors, working from the text up to personalized theory, rather than from generalized theory down to text. The Augustan poetry book is central to the development of Latin letter collections (in sharp contrast to the lack of influence from poetry books on the Greek epistolographical tradition). But the poetics of the two Roman forms are fundamentally different. In Ovid’s Amores, the signifier is centripetal and returns to reflect on its own programmatic status within a collection; but Pliny’s letters are centrifugal and generally move outwards from internal signifier to external signified. Prospects for reading events in Pliny’s life as primarily instantiations of a literary programme are diminished.

Downloaded on 25.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111308128-002/html
Scroll to top button