Home Mathematics 5 How to use socio-emotional signals for adaptive training
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

5 How to use socio-emotional signals for adaptive training

  • Tobias Moebert , Jan N. Schneider , Dietmar Zoerner , Anna Tscherejkina and Ulrike Lucke
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Personalized Human-Computer Interaction
This chapter is in the book Personalized Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

A closer alignment of mutual expectations between technical systems and their users regarding functionality and interactions is supposed to improve their overall performance. In general, such an alignment is realized by automatically adapting the appearance and the behavior of a system. Adaptation may be based on parameters regarding the task to be fulfilled, the surrounding context or the user himself. Among the latter, the current emphasis of research is shifting from a user’s traces in the system (for instance, to derive his level of expertise) toward transient aspects (like his current mental or emotional state). For educational technology, in particular, adapting the presented information and the tasks to be solved to the current personal needs of a learner promises a higher motivation, and thus a better learning outcome. Tasks which are equally challenging and motivating the users can keep them in a state of flow, and thus foster enduring engagement. This is of certain importance for difficult topics and/or learners with disabilities. The chapter explains the complex cause-and-effect models behind adaptive training systems, the mechanisms that can be facilitated to implement them, as well as empirical results from a clinical study. We exemplify this for the training of emotion recognition by people with autism, but not limited to this user group. For this purpose, we present two approaches. One is to extend the Elo algorithm regarding dimensions of difficulty in social cognition. This allows not only to judge the difficulty of tasks and the skills of users, but also to freely generate well-suited tasks. The second approach is to make use of socio-emotional signals of the learners in order to further adapt the training system. We discuss current possibilities and remaining challenges for these approaches.

Abstract

A closer alignment of mutual expectations between technical systems and their users regarding functionality and interactions is supposed to improve their overall performance. In general, such an alignment is realized by automatically adapting the appearance and the behavior of a system. Adaptation may be based on parameters regarding the task to be fulfilled, the surrounding context or the user himself. Among the latter, the current emphasis of research is shifting from a user’s traces in the system (for instance, to derive his level of expertise) toward transient aspects (like his current mental or emotional state). For educational technology, in particular, adapting the presented information and the tasks to be solved to the current personal needs of a learner promises a higher motivation, and thus a better learning outcome. Tasks which are equally challenging and motivating the users can keep them in a state of flow, and thus foster enduring engagement. This is of certain importance for difficult topics and/or learners with disabilities. The chapter explains the complex cause-and-effect models behind adaptive training systems, the mechanisms that can be facilitated to implement them, as well as empirical results from a clinical study. We exemplify this for the training of emotion recognition by people with autism, but not limited to this user group. For this purpose, we present two approaches. One is to extend the Elo algorithm regarding dimensions of difficulty in social cognition. This allows not only to judge the difficulty of tasks and the skills of users, but also to freely generate well-suited tasks. The second approach is to make use of socio-emotional signals of the learners in order to further adapt the training system. We discuss current possibilities and remaining challenges for these approaches.

Downloaded on 12.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110988567-005/html
Scroll to top button