Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Tacitus for courtiers

  • Roland Mayer is now Emeritus Professor of Classics at King’s College London. Most of his scholarly publication has been in the form of commentaries, a traditional medium in which our honorand is much interested. But he has also ventured into reception studies, particularly regarding Horace and Seneca, and most recently with a comprehensive cultural history of the ruins of ancient Rome.

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Commenting on the Past
This chapter is in the book Commenting on the Past

Abstract

The Tacitist movement of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries occupied numerous writers across western Europe. The movement began in northern Italy and rapidly spread across the continent. It was predicated upon the conviction that Tacitus’s description of autocracy in the early Roman Empire had lessons to teach contemporary Europeans whose states were ruled by monarchs. Modern students of this widespread movement justifiably tend to focus on its political aspects, such as autocracy and “reason of state.” It is the aim of the present essay, however, to draw attention to a complementary concern of Tacitist authors, many of whom were themselves courtiers: the value of the Roman historian for an understanding of their own condition as the subjects of autocrats.

Abstract

The Tacitist movement of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries occupied numerous writers across western Europe. The movement began in northern Italy and rapidly spread across the continent. It was predicated upon the conviction that Tacitus’s description of autocracy in the early Roman Empire had lessons to teach contemporary Europeans whose states were ruled by monarchs. Modern students of this widespread movement justifiably tend to focus on its political aspects, such as autocracy and “reason of state.” It is the aim of the present essay, however, to draw attention to a complementary concern of Tacitist authors, many of whom were themselves courtiers: the value of the Roman historian for an understanding of their own condition as the subjects of autocrats.

Downloaded on 26.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110777925-016/html
Scroll to top button