Startseite Philosophie Human Beauty, Attraction, and Disinterested Pleasure
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Human Beauty, Attraction, and Disinterested Pleasure

  • Lisa Schmalzried
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Disinterested Pleasure and Beauty
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Disinterested Pleasure and Beauty

Abstract

It is natural to describe experiences of human beauty as involving attraction. This attraction thesis presumably contracts Kant′s thesis of disinterestedness. Therefore, I examine both theses and their compatibility. First, I will propose to analyze experiences of human beauty as experiences of amiability. Secondly, I will argue that amiability experiences are disinterested in a weak but not strong sense. My third point is that Kant defends strong disinterestedness. It follows from the assumption of the free play of our powers of cognition which is, for him, essential to explain the subjective-objective-hybridity of beauty judgments. Aesthetic dispositionalism provides another way to explain this hybridity, however. This explanation is not committed to the strong claim of disinterestedness. And it is compatible with the amiability thesis. So, one has no compelling reason to accept Kant′s claim that all beauty experiences, including those of human beauty, need to be disinterested in a strong sense.

Abstract

It is natural to describe experiences of human beauty as involving attraction. This attraction thesis presumably contracts Kant′s thesis of disinterestedness. Therefore, I examine both theses and their compatibility. First, I will propose to analyze experiences of human beauty as experiences of amiability. Secondly, I will argue that amiability experiences are disinterested in a weak but not strong sense. My third point is that Kant defends strong disinterestedness. It follows from the assumption of the free play of our powers of cognition which is, for him, essential to explain the subjective-objective-hybridity of beauty judgments. Aesthetic dispositionalism provides another way to explain this hybridity, however. This explanation is not committed to the strong claim of disinterestedness. And it is compatible with the amiability thesis. So, one has no compelling reason to accept Kant′s claim that all beauty experiences, including those of human beauty, need to be disinterested in a strong sense.

Heruntergeladen am 6.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110727685-010/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen