Home Business & Economics Chapter 13 Performance of six turbulence models in predicting two-phase flow on a hydraulic test bench
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 13 Performance of six turbulence models in predicting two-phase flow on a hydraulic test bench

  • Khadija Rahal , Zied Driss and Mohamed Salah Abid
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Smart Green Energy Production
This chapter is in the book Smart Green Energy Production

Abstract

In this study, numerical computations were conducted using the CFD software ANSYS Fluent 17.0. The volume of fluid approach was employed to capture the position of the interface between water and air. The unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) equations were used to model the unsteady turbulent flow in a large-scale hydraulic test bench. These equations require turbulence models to close the Reynolds stress tensor. The choice of the turbulence model is a compromise between the accuracy and the computing time, and they can affect the solution accuracy. This study mainly aims to examine six turbulence models and to select the best model that can provide the most accurate simulation of the flow field over the hydraulic test bench. The six turbulence models examined are the standard k-ε model, the realizable k-ε model, the RNG k-ε model, the standard k-ω model, the transition SST k-ω model and the BSL k-ω model. The distribution of the water-air flow characteristics such as the magnitude velocity, the pressure and the turbulence characteristics were presented for each model. The validation of our numerical model was achieved by comparing the present predictions with the experimental data of (Koshizuka et al. 1995) for the breaking of a dam. It is worth noting that the RNG k-ε model provided the best findings along the test section compared to the other models. We can conclude that the RNG k-ɛ model is the best in terms of accuracy, stability and efficiency of the computed solutions.

Abstract

In this study, numerical computations were conducted using the CFD software ANSYS Fluent 17.0. The volume of fluid approach was employed to capture the position of the interface between water and air. The unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) equations were used to model the unsteady turbulent flow in a large-scale hydraulic test bench. These equations require turbulence models to close the Reynolds stress tensor. The choice of the turbulence model is a compromise between the accuracy and the computing time, and they can affect the solution accuracy. This study mainly aims to examine six turbulence models and to select the best model that can provide the most accurate simulation of the flow field over the hydraulic test bench. The six turbulence models examined are the standard k-ε model, the realizable k-ε model, the RNG k-ε model, the standard k-ω model, the transition SST k-ω model and the BSL k-ω model. The distribution of the water-air flow characteristics such as the magnitude velocity, the pressure and the turbulence characteristics were presented for each model. The validation of our numerical model was achieved by comparing the present predictions with the experimental data of (Koshizuka et al. 1995) for the breaking of a dam. It is worth noting that the RNG k-ε model provided the best findings along the test section compared to the other models. We can conclude that the RNG k-ɛ model is the best in terms of accuracy, stability and efficiency of the computed solutions.

Downloaded on 12.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110717655-013/html
Scroll to top button