Startseite Philosophie Nietzsche und das kulturelle Gedächtnis. Eine kritische Relektüre der Zweiten Unzeitgemässen Betrachtung
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Nietzsche und das kulturelle Gedächtnis. Eine kritische Relektüre der Zweiten Unzeitgemässen Betrachtung

  • Aleida Assmann
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Nietzsche on Memory and History
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Nietzsche on Memory and History

Abstract

The thesis of this contribution is that the new media have by no means made the idea of culture as memory obsolete, but instead have only spurred it on. Flickering screens and digital numerical codes have created in dialectical response a new feeling for the materiality of the data carriers, electronic volatility has created a new sense of the risk of losing long-term stability, and the acceleration of the information flow has created a new awareness for the persistence of messages. Under these conditions, the institutions of storage memory [Speichergedächtnis] - museums, archive and libraries - take on an entirely new meaning. Whereas Nietzsche’s concern at the end of the 19th century was functional memory [Funktionsgedächtnis], ours at the beginning of the 21st century is storage memory [Speichergedächtnis]. Human memory always reconstructs the past, as cognitive scientists assure us, according to the needs of the present; it is eager to transform the odd into the functional, the diachronic into the synchronic. However, different standards apply to cultural memory. Today we no longer live only in the age of the technical reproducibility of the artwork, which, according to Walter Benjamin, endangers the aura of the original, but also in the age of universal malleability of all data, which transcends the physicality and materiality of memory. No wonder that storage memory in the year 2000 is no longer what it was for Nietzsche a little more than a hundred years ago: a threat and opponent of memory. In the digital age, it has become above all a guarantor and a prerequisite for memory.

Abstract

The thesis of this contribution is that the new media have by no means made the idea of culture as memory obsolete, but instead have only spurred it on. Flickering screens and digital numerical codes have created in dialectical response a new feeling for the materiality of the data carriers, electronic volatility has created a new sense of the risk of losing long-term stability, and the acceleration of the information flow has created a new awareness for the persistence of messages. Under these conditions, the institutions of storage memory [Speichergedächtnis] - museums, archive and libraries - take on an entirely new meaning. Whereas Nietzsche’s concern at the end of the 19th century was functional memory [Funktionsgedächtnis], ours at the beginning of the 21st century is storage memory [Speichergedächtnis]. Human memory always reconstructs the past, as cognitive scientists assure us, according to the needs of the present; it is eager to transform the odd into the functional, the diachronic into the synchronic. However, different standards apply to cultural memory. Today we no longer live only in the age of the technical reproducibility of the artwork, which, according to Walter Benjamin, endangers the aura of the original, but also in the age of universal malleability of all data, which transcends the physicality and materiality of memory. No wonder that storage memory in the year 2000 is no longer what it was for Nietzsche a little more than a hundred years ago: a threat and opponent of memory. In the digital age, it has become above all a guarantor and a prerequisite for memory.

Kapitel in diesem Buch

  1. Frontmatter I
  2. Acknowledgements VII
  3. Contents IX
  4. List of Abbreviations / Siglenverzeichnis XIII
  5. Introduction 1
  6. Section I: History
  7. Critical History and Genealogy 17
  8. Typologies of Histories 37
  9. Origins and Genealogies 57
  10. Section II: Memory and Forgetting
  11. Nietzsche und das kulturelle Gedächtnis. Eine kritische Relektüre der Zweiten Unzeitgemässen Betrachtung 79
  12. „Göttlich ist des Vergessens Kunst“. Nietzsches Poetik des Gedächtnisses 95
  13. What is ‘Active’ Forgetting in Nietzsche’s Genealogy II, 1? 113
  14. Eternal Return and Memory 129
  15. Memory, History and the Paternal Shadow: Nietzsche’s Autobiographical Survival 139
  16. Das Trauma des Werdens – Nietzsche gegen die Identität 159
  17. Section III: The Person and Society
  18. Gedächtnis und Leiblichkeit: Herkunft, Gefahr und Aktualität ihres Zusammenhangs 177
  19. History and Memory in Civilization- Building Processes: A Reading of Der Antichrist, 56–58 193
  20. Histories of Violence: Nietzsche on Cruelty and Normative Order 209
  21. Temporalities of the Feeling of Power 239
  22. „Versprechen können“ oder „versprechen dürfen“?: Anmerkungen über die ersten drei Abschnitte in der zweiten Abhandlung von Nietzsches Zur Genealogie der Moral 253
  23. Section IV: Context and Reception
  24. Die Literaturgeschichte als „künstlerische Produktion“. Der Schopenhauersche Begriff der Geschichte und die nachgelassenen Fragmente Nietzsches aus der Zeit 1867/1868 265
  25. Zwischen Geschichte und Gedächtnis: Aby Warburg, Jacob Burckhardt und Friedrich Nietzsche 279
  26. Vordenker kollektiver identitätsbildender Gedächtniskonstruktionen? Eine kritische Sichtung der Nietzsche-Rezeption Aleida und Jan Assmanns 301
  27. Index 323
Heruntergeladen am 24.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110671162-005/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen