Startseite Philosophie Saying What is Not
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Saying What is Not

  • Markus Gabriel
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Idealism, Relativism, and Realism
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Idealism, Relativism, and Realism

Abstract

A major weakness of contemporary accounts of existence and non-existence alike arises from the tendency to believe that the answers to questions of existence can put us in touch with a distinctive “catalogue” of reality. Applying instead his ontology of “fields of sense,” Gabriel questions in this paper both the idea of existence as dependent upon this “catalogue” conception of reality and, equally, on the Meinongian and Neo-Meinongian positions recently defended by Graham Priest and others, according to which there are objects that do not exist, including even contradictory ones. While the first leads to a “furniture ontology,” the latter provokes semantic randomness, in that there is no longer any regular way to answer questions of existence. Gabriel’s ontological descriptivism, by contrast, guarantees that the resolution to the question of objectivity depends on nothing but a coherent domain (a field of sense) and its objects.

Abstract

A major weakness of contemporary accounts of existence and non-existence alike arises from the tendency to believe that the answers to questions of existence can put us in touch with a distinctive “catalogue” of reality. Applying instead his ontology of “fields of sense,” Gabriel questions in this paper both the idea of existence as dependent upon this “catalogue” conception of reality and, equally, on the Meinongian and Neo-Meinongian positions recently defended by Graham Priest and others, according to which there are objects that do not exist, including even contradictory ones. While the first leads to a “furniture ontology,” the latter provokes semantic randomness, in that there is no longer any regular way to answer questions of existence. Gabriel’s ontological descriptivism, by contrast, guarantees that the resolution to the question of objectivity depends on nothing but a coherent domain (a field of sense) and its objects.

Heruntergeladen am 3.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110670349-012/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen