Startseite Philosophie Matter and Indifference: Realism and Anti-realism in Feminist Accounts of the Body
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Matter and Indifference: Realism and Anti-realism in Feminist Accounts of the Body

  • Deborah Goldgaber
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Idealism, Relativism, and Realism
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Idealism, Relativism, and Realism

Abstract

Recently, influential critics have argued that feminist accounts of the body are insufficiently realist and materialist. These emphasize the body’s social or discursive ‘construction’ at the expense of biological morphogenesis. The way feminists ‘bracket’ the body’s biological status prevents them from theorizing the relation and interaction of social and biological forces. While these materialist critiques correctly diagnose issues with certain anti-realist accounts of embodiment, which contest that the body has a biological essence, most feminist accounts of embodiment, I argue, are not anti-realist in this respect. Indeed, contrary to an increasingly influential view, feminist accounts of discursive construction are not inherently anti-realist or anti-materialist. The real issue with constructivist accounts is not that they exclude the body’s organic or biological substance, as the materialists argue, but rather the assumption that discursive construction refers exclusively to cultural processes. Thus, I propose rereading feminist new materialist critiques as motivating the extension of ‘discursive construction’ beyond the human.

Abstract

Recently, influential critics have argued that feminist accounts of the body are insufficiently realist and materialist. These emphasize the body’s social or discursive ‘construction’ at the expense of biological morphogenesis. The way feminists ‘bracket’ the body’s biological status prevents them from theorizing the relation and interaction of social and biological forces. While these materialist critiques correctly diagnose issues with certain anti-realist accounts of embodiment, which contest that the body has a biological essence, most feminist accounts of embodiment, I argue, are not anti-realist in this respect. Indeed, contrary to an increasingly influential view, feminist accounts of discursive construction are not inherently anti-realist or anti-materialist. The real issue with constructivist accounts is not that they exclude the body’s organic or biological substance, as the materialists argue, but rather the assumption that discursive construction refers exclusively to cultural processes. Thus, I propose rereading feminist new materialist critiques as motivating the extension of ‘discursive construction’ beyond the human.

Heruntergeladen am 3.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110670349-011/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen