Home Philosophy Evolving Realities: Scientific Prediction and Objectivity from the Perspective of Historical Epistemology
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Evolving Realities: Scientific Prediction and Objectivity from the Perspective of Historical Epistemology

  • Anastasios Brenner
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
New Approaches to Scientific Realism
This chapter is in the book New Approaches to Scientific Realism

Abstract

Predictive power is one of the main arguments put forth in favor of scientific realism. Yet its precise characterization raises questions. From a logical point of view, a prediction consists of deriving a consequence from a universal law and initial conditions. But this does not appear to capture what motivates the scientist to adopt a new theory. Following post-positivists, one may go on to stipulate further conditions: a prediction should be novel, stunning or dramatic. Such concepts draw attention to context. They express a move away from the logical analysis of theory structure to the historical study of theory change. The temporal aspect of prediction is thereby taken into account. However, by bringing in the historical, sociological and psychological dimensions, the risk is that we dissolve altogether the notion we are trying to define. I am led to believe that there is something lacking in the historical inquiry just outlined. To be sure, it has been carried out within a rather narrow compass and has not sufficiently taken into account the contributions of other relevant traditions. My aim, then, is to bring the school of historical epistemology to bear on this issue, in other words, to question afresh the evolving realities that science offers us.

Abstract

Predictive power is one of the main arguments put forth in favor of scientific realism. Yet its precise characterization raises questions. From a logical point of view, a prediction consists of deriving a consequence from a universal law and initial conditions. But this does not appear to capture what motivates the scientist to adopt a new theory. Following post-positivists, one may go on to stipulate further conditions: a prediction should be novel, stunning or dramatic. Such concepts draw attention to context. They express a move away from the logical analysis of theory structure to the historical study of theory change. The temporal aspect of prediction is thereby taken into account. However, by bringing in the historical, sociological and psychological dimensions, the risk is that we dissolve altogether the notion we are trying to define. I am led to believe that there is something lacking in the historical inquiry just outlined. To be sure, it has been carried out within a rather narrow compass and has not sufficiently taken into account the contributions of other relevant traditions. My aim, then, is to bring the school of historical epistemology to bear on this issue, in other words, to question afresh the evolving realities that science offers us.

Chapters in this book

  1. Frontmatter I
  2. Contents V
  3. Novelty in Scientific Realism: New Approaches to an Ongoing Debate 1
  4. I New Framework for the Realism and Anti-realism Debate
  5. Scientific Realism: What’s All the Fuss? 27
  6. Scientific Realism and Three Problems for Inference to the Best Explanation 48
  7. Scientific Realism and the Conflict with Common Sense 68
  8. II Approaches based on History and Scientific Realism
  9. Evolving Realities: Scientific Prediction and Objectivity from the Perspective of Historical Epistemology 87
  10. Do Cognitive Illusions Make Scientific Realism Deceptively Attractive? 104
  11. III Logical Approaches in Realist Terms
  12. Against Paraconsistentism 133
  13. Stratified Nomic Realism 145
  14. IV Logico-Epistemological Structural Realism and Instrumental Realism
  15. Structural Realism: The Only Defensible Realist Game in Town? 169
  16. Mathematical Language and the Changing Concept of Physical Reality 206
  17. V New Developments on Critical Scientific Realism and Pragmatic Realism
  18. Interdisciplinarity from the Perspective of Critical Scientific Realism 231
  19. Pragmatic Realism and Scientific Prediction: The Role of Complexity 251
  20. VI Realism on Causality and Representation
  21. Realism and AIM (Action, Intervention, Manipulation) Theories of Causality 291
  22. Is Physics Biased Against Alternative Possibilities? 305
  23. VII Realist Accounts on Objectivity and Facts
  24. Realistic Components in the Conception of Pragmatic Idealism: The Role of Objectivity and the Notion of “Fact” 331
  25. “Heard Enough from the Experts”? A Popperian Enquiry 348
  26. Realism in Archaeology – A Philosophical Perspective 365
  27. VIII Realism and the Social World: From Social Sciences to the Sciences of the Artificial
  28. A Structural Realist Approach to International Relations Theory 391
  29. Objectivity and Truth in Sciences of Communication and the Case of the Internet 415
  30. Index of Names 437
  31. Subject Index 447
Downloaded on 20.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110664737-005/html
Scroll to top button