Home Linguistics & Semiotics Patterns and meanings of hedging verbs in English-medium research articles by Chinese and Western scholars
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Patterns and meanings of hedging verbs in English-medium research articles by Chinese and Western scholars

  • Yuesen Yang and Naixing Wei
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Variation in Time and Space
This chapter is in the book Variation in Time and Space

Abstract

The present research is a corpus-based contrastive analysis of patterns and meanings of hedging verbs in English-medium research articles written by Chinese and Western scholars. We use data from two self-built corpora, the Chinese Scholars Academic English Corpus (CSAEC) and the Western Scholars Academic English Corpus (WSAEC) for analysis. The results show that frequently occurring lexical sequences of hedging verbs have 36 hedging patterns of use, which perform five discourse acts in the academic texts under study, namely, interpreting data, formulating claims, validating models/theories, reasoning and reporting, and also realize four strategic meanings: the accurate representation strategy, consensus-seeking strategy, claim commitment strategy and reader- engaging strategy. Chinese and Western scholars tend to have different preferences for patterns to realize meanings/functions. The findings of this study have provided insights into the features and nature of hedging patterns in association with academic discourse acts and strategies. They are of potential value for improving academic writing pedagogy.

Abstract

The present research is a corpus-based contrastive analysis of patterns and meanings of hedging verbs in English-medium research articles written by Chinese and Western scholars. We use data from two self-built corpora, the Chinese Scholars Academic English Corpus (CSAEC) and the Western Scholars Academic English Corpus (WSAEC) for analysis. The results show that frequently occurring lexical sequences of hedging verbs have 36 hedging patterns of use, which perform five discourse acts in the academic texts under study, namely, interpreting data, formulating claims, validating models/theories, reasoning and reporting, and also realize four strategic meanings: the accurate representation strategy, consensus-seeking strategy, claim commitment strategy and reader- engaging strategy. Chinese and Western scholars tend to have different preferences for patterns to realize meanings/functions. The findings of this study have provided insights into the features and nature of hedging patterns in association with academic discourse acts and strategies. They are of potential value for improving academic writing pedagogy.

Downloaded on 26.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110604719-014/html
Scroll to top button