Startseite Philosophie A Phenomenological Critique of Kantian Ethics
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

A Phenomenological Critique of Kantian Ethics

  • Dominique Pradelle
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

We want to focus on Husserl’s critique of Kantian ethics and to develop the following questions. As opposed to the empiricist orientation of Hume’s ethics, the Kantian foundation of ethics has an a priori character; does this character have to be identified with the origin of ethical principles in pure subjectivity? If not, what is its phenomenological signification? The meaning of the Copernican revolution is that structures of objects accord with the universal structures of the finite subject; Husserl refuses this principle and assumes that every sort of object determines a regulative structure in the subject; is it possible to apply this anti-Copernican principle to the ethical sphere? As opposed to the Kantian principle of the supremacy of practical reason, we find in Husserl’s thought a supremacy of theoretical reason; what is the meaning of this inversion? The concept of foundation has great importance in Husserlian phenomenology: every sort of truth of a higher degree is founded on the lower level of sensible truth; is it possible to apply this principle to the ethical sphere? Finally, the Kantian concept of liberty is not an empirical one, but a cosmological and practical idea; what is the phenomenological meaning of liberty?

Abstract

We want to focus on Husserl’s critique of Kantian ethics and to develop the following questions. As opposed to the empiricist orientation of Hume’s ethics, the Kantian foundation of ethics has an a priori character; does this character have to be identified with the origin of ethical principles in pure subjectivity? If not, what is its phenomenological signification? The meaning of the Copernican revolution is that structures of objects accord with the universal structures of the finite subject; Husserl refuses this principle and assumes that every sort of object determines a regulative structure in the subject; is it possible to apply this anti-Copernican principle to the ethical sphere? As opposed to the Kantian principle of the supremacy of practical reason, we find in Husserl’s thought a supremacy of theoretical reason; what is the meaning of this inversion? The concept of foundation has great importance in Husserlian phenomenology: every sort of truth of a higher degree is founded on the lower level of sensible truth; is it possible to apply this principle to the ethical sphere? Finally, the Kantian concept of liberty is not an empirical one, but a cosmological and practical idea; what is the phenomenological meaning of liberty?

Kapitel in diesem Buch

  1. Frontmatter i
  2. Table of Contents v
  3. Husserl, Kant, and Transcendental Phenomenology 1
  4. Section I: The Transcendantal and the A priori
  5. The Meaning of the Transcendental in the Philosophies of Kant and Husserl 23
  6. The Ethics of the Transcendental 41
  7. The Phenomenological a priori as Husserlian Solution to the Problem of Kant’s “Transcendental Psychologism” 57
  8. On the Naturalization of the Transcendental 83
  9. Kant, Husserl, and the Aim of a “Transcendental Anthropology” 101
  10. Section II: The Ego and the Sphere of Otherness
  11. Transcendental Apperception and Temporalization 127
  12. “The Ego beside Itself” 143
  13. Kant and Husserl on Overcoming Skeptical Idealism through Transcendental Idealism 163
  14. “Pure Ego and Nothing More” 189
  15. Towards a Phenomenological Metaphysics 213
  16. The Transcendental Grounding of the Experience of the Other (Fremderfahrung) in Husserl’s Phenomenology 235
  17. Section III: Aesthetic, Logic, Science, Ethics
  18. Aesthetic, Intuition, Experience 259
  19. Synthesis and Identity 279
  20. Questions of Genesis as Questions of Validity 303
  21. Philosophical Scientists and Scientific Philosophers 333
  22. A Phenomenological Critique of Kantian Ethics 359
  23. Section IV: Transcendental Philosophy in Debate
  24. Is There a “Copernican” or an “Anti-Copernican” Revolution in Phenomenology? 391
  25. Back to Fichte? 411
  26. “An Explosive Thought:” Kant, Fink, and the Cosmic Concept of the World 439
  27. Eugen Fink’s Transcendental Phenomenology of the World 455
  28. Amphibian Dreams 479
  29. Husserlian Phenomenology in the Light of Microphenomenology 505
  30. Index of Persons 523
  31. Subject Index 527
Heruntergeladen am 15.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110564280-017/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen