Startseite Philosophie Kant, Husserl, and the Aim of a “Transcendental Anthropology”
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Kant, Husserl, and the Aim of a “Transcendental Anthropology”

  • Claudia Serban
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This chapter deals with the question of whether transcendental philosophy should inevitably have to choose between subscribing to an “anthropological prohibition” (denounced by Blumenberg) or accepting an “anthropologization” of the transcendental (disavowed by Husserl). While examining the relationship between transcendental philosophy and anthropology both in Kant and Husserl, a special emphasis is placed upon their common idea of a “transcendental anthropology.” The project of such an anthropology addresses the necessity of developing the transcendental egology in several directions in order to incorporate and re-elaborate certain fundamental aspects of the empirical - psychological or worldly - dimension of subjective life. Thus, it is not only the core of a philosophical anthropology and of its concept of humanity that might be reshaped, but also the meaning and scope of the transcendental itself.

Abstract

This chapter deals with the question of whether transcendental philosophy should inevitably have to choose between subscribing to an “anthropological prohibition” (denounced by Blumenberg) or accepting an “anthropologization” of the transcendental (disavowed by Husserl). While examining the relationship between transcendental philosophy and anthropology both in Kant and Husserl, a special emphasis is placed upon their common idea of a “transcendental anthropology.” The project of such an anthropology addresses the necessity of developing the transcendental egology in several directions in order to incorporate and re-elaborate certain fundamental aspects of the empirical - psychological or worldly - dimension of subjective life. Thus, it is not only the core of a philosophical anthropology and of its concept of humanity that might be reshaped, but also the meaning and scope of the transcendental itself.

Kapitel in diesem Buch

  1. Frontmatter i
  2. Table of Contents v
  3. Husserl, Kant, and Transcendental Phenomenology 1
  4. Section I: The Transcendantal and the A priori
  5. The Meaning of the Transcendental in the Philosophies of Kant and Husserl 23
  6. The Ethics of the Transcendental 41
  7. The Phenomenological a priori as Husserlian Solution to the Problem of Kant’s “Transcendental Psychologism” 57
  8. On the Naturalization of the Transcendental 83
  9. Kant, Husserl, and the Aim of a “Transcendental Anthropology” 101
  10. Section II: The Ego and the Sphere of Otherness
  11. Transcendental Apperception and Temporalization 127
  12. “The Ego beside Itself” 143
  13. Kant and Husserl on Overcoming Skeptical Idealism through Transcendental Idealism 163
  14. “Pure Ego and Nothing More” 189
  15. Towards a Phenomenological Metaphysics 213
  16. The Transcendental Grounding of the Experience of the Other (Fremderfahrung) in Husserl’s Phenomenology 235
  17. Section III: Aesthetic, Logic, Science, Ethics
  18. Aesthetic, Intuition, Experience 259
  19. Synthesis and Identity 279
  20. Questions of Genesis as Questions of Validity 303
  21. Philosophical Scientists and Scientific Philosophers 333
  22. A Phenomenological Critique of Kantian Ethics 359
  23. Section IV: Transcendental Philosophy in Debate
  24. Is There a “Copernican” or an “Anti-Copernican” Revolution in Phenomenology? 391
  25. Back to Fichte? 411
  26. “An Explosive Thought:” Kant, Fink, and the Cosmic Concept of the World 439
  27. Eugen Fink’s Transcendental Phenomenology of the World 455
  28. Amphibian Dreams 479
  29. Husserlian Phenomenology in the Light of Microphenomenology 505
  30. Index of Persons 523
  31. Subject Index 527
Heruntergeladen am 15.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110564280-006/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen