Startseite Literaturwissenschaften Artusrittertum und Melancholie
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Artusrittertum und Melancholie

  • Friedrich Wolfzettel
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Emotion und Handlung im Artusroman
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Emotion und Handlung im Artusroman

Abstract

Compared with other medieval narrative genres, French Arthurian romance seems to be characterized by unusually frequent use of the word field of thoughtfulness (manifested in the words penser and pensif), often to imply melancholy and brooding. It is actually the only genre to celebrate melancholy in this way. Here, melancholy might be explained as a foreboding of doom or, more generally, as the product of an unresolved and virtually utopian tension between ideals and reality (Erich Köhler) and by the intimation of futility which identifies Arthurian literature as the first ›adult‹ and ›modern‹ narrative model of the Middle Ages. Aside from this, from a narratological point of view there is a functional difference between verse and prose romance. In the former, the word field penser triggers a temporary immobilization of the lonely hero’s quest or even a kind of ecstasis. In the latter, penser and its correlatives imprint a seal of emotional intensity on entire sections of the action, as can be seen in the Galehaut episode of the Lancelot en prose or in the final moments of the Arthurian realm in La Mort Artu. In these different realisations, melancholy/penser is woven into the fabric of the Arthurian concept.

Abstract

Compared with other medieval narrative genres, French Arthurian romance seems to be characterized by unusually frequent use of the word field of thoughtfulness (manifested in the words penser and pensif), often to imply melancholy and brooding. It is actually the only genre to celebrate melancholy in this way. Here, melancholy might be explained as a foreboding of doom or, more generally, as the product of an unresolved and virtually utopian tension between ideals and reality (Erich Köhler) and by the intimation of futility which identifies Arthurian literature as the first ›adult‹ and ›modern‹ narrative model of the Middle Ages. Aside from this, from a narratological point of view there is a functional difference between verse and prose romance. In the former, the word field penser triggers a temporary immobilization of the lonely hero’s quest or even a kind of ecstasis. In the latter, penser and its correlatives imprint a seal of emotional intensity on entire sections of the action, as can be seen in the Galehaut episode of the Lancelot en prose or in the final moments of the Arthurian realm in La Mort Artu. In these different realisations, melancholy/penser is woven into the fabric of the Arthurian concept.

Heruntergeladen am 23.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110536058-001/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen