Chapter 6. Epistemic shifts
-
Stephanie Anne Shelton
Abstract
This chapter examines epistemic shifts over the course of one year of interviews with “Bailey,” specifically in relation to the interviewer’s tendency to praise Bailey. Initially, Bailey sought the researcher and interviewer’s advice, establishing herself as having a knowledge deficit (K-) and the interviewer as an expert (K+). In this analysis, the researcher examines the epistemic shifts partially demonstrated through Bailey’s self-praise, which established Bailey as knowledgeable and an advisor to others (K+). In this chapter, the author shows how Bailey’s K+ self-descriptors contradict conversation norms, in that individuals typically downgrade their accomplishments and abilities in talk with others. In reexamining the data, the author finds that Bailey’s self-praise was in response to the interviewer’s talk, as she actively praised Bailey and Bailey’s teaching practice throughout the data. This discussion is valuable to interview-based research both because it explores the ways that an interviewer’s interactions shape a participant’s responses and the ways that, over multiple interviews, those interactions might influence epistemic shifts in interviewer/interviewee exchanges.
Abstract
This chapter examines epistemic shifts over the course of one year of interviews with “Bailey,” specifically in relation to the interviewer’s tendency to praise Bailey. Initially, Bailey sought the researcher and interviewer’s advice, establishing herself as having a knowledge deficit (K-) and the interviewer as an expert (K+). In this analysis, the researcher examines the epistemic shifts partially demonstrated through Bailey’s self-praise, which established Bailey as knowledgeable and an advisor to others (K+). In this chapter, the author shows how Bailey’s K+ self-descriptors contradict conversation norms, in that individuals typically downgrade their accomplishments and abilities in talk with others. In reexamining the data, the author finds that Bailey’s self-praise was in response to the interviewer’s talk, as she actively praised Bailey and Bailey’s teaching practice throughout the data. This discussion is valuable to interview-based research both because it explores the ways that an interviewer’s interactions shape a participant’s responses and the ways that, over multiple interviews, those interactions might influence epistemic shifts in interviewer/interviewee exchanges.
Kapitel in diesem Buch
- Prelim pages i
- Table of contents v
- Acknowledgements ix
- Contributors xi
- Transcription conventions xv
- Preface xvii
-
Part I. Introduction
- Chapter 1. Introduction 3
-
Part II. Exploring the interactional details of interviewer-interviewee identities and knowledge production in research interviews
- Introduction to Part II. Exploring the interactional details of interviewer-interviewee identities and knowledge production in research interviews 31
- Chapter 2. “Like us you mean?” 37
- Chapter 3. Research interviewers as ‘knowers’ and ‘unknowers’ 59
- Chapter 4. On doing ‘being feminist’ and ‘being researcher’ 79
- Chapter 5. “What does it mean?” 103
- Chapter 6. Epistemic shifts 125
-
Part III. Exploring conversational resources and social actions produced in interviews
- Introduction to Part III. Exploring conversational resources and social actions produced in interviews 143
- Chapter 7. “That’s a stupid question!” 147
- Chapter 8. “But you’re gonna ask me questions, right?” 181
- Chapter 9. “It doesn’t make sense, but it actually does” 201
- Chapter 10. Continuers in research interviews 219
- Chapter 11. Discourse strategies of mitigation in an oral corpus of narratives of life experience collected in interviews 239
-
Part IV. Summing up
- Chapter 12. The way(s) of interviewing 271
- References 283
- Author index 319
- Subject index 325
Kapitel in diesem Buch
- Prelim pages i
- Table of contents v
- Acknowledgements ix
- Contributors xi
- Transcription conventions xv
- Preface xvii
-
Part I. Introduction
- Chapter 1. Introduction 3
-
Part II. Exploring the interactional details of interviewer-interviewee identities and knowledge production in research interviews
- Introduction to Part II. Exploring the interactional details of interviewer-interviewee identities and knowledge production in research interviews 31
- Chapter 2. “Like us you mean?” 37
- Chapter 3. Research interviewers as ‘knowers’ and ‘unknowers’ 59
- Chapter 4. On doing ‘being feminist’ and ‘being researcher’ 79
- Chapter 5. “What does it mean?” 103
- Chapter 6. Epistemic shifts 125
-
Part III. Exploring conversational resources and social actions produced in interviews
- Introduction to Part III. Exploring conversational resources and social actions produced in interviews 143
- Chapter 7. “That’s a stupid question!” 147
- Chapter 8. “But you’re gonna ask me questions, right?” 181
- Chapter 9. “It doesn’t make sense, but it actually does” 201
- Chapter 10. Continuers in research interviews 219
- Chapter 11. Discourse strategies of mitigation in an oral corpus of narratives of life experience collected in interviews 239
-
Part IV. Summing up
- Chapter 12. The way(s) of interviewing 271
- References 283
- Author index 319
- Subject index 325