Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik The autopsy of a modal – insights from the historical development of German
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The autopsy of a modal – insights from the historical development of German

  • Jakob Maché
Weitere Titel anzeigen von John Benjamins Publishing Company
Modality–Aspect Interfaces
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Modality–Aspect Interfaces

Abstract

As Abraham (1990, 1991, 2005) has pointed out, aspect plays a crucial role, when epistemic modals (em) emerge out of root modals (rm). The present paper shows that the different aspectual preferences of those items are reflected by the differences in the configuration of the modal’s event structure: whereas rm turn out to be event modifiers, em are propositional modifiers. In technical detail, rm select infinitival complements involving an event argument and assign to them a interval posterior to utterance time. em, on the other hand, can combine with any non-finite complement that constitutes a licit proposition. This paper will discuss some data from German that shows that rm are indeed event modifiers since they (1) fail to embed predicates that lack event arguments and (2) are bound to complements with future orientation. The grammaticalisation of em then can be considered as a decline of the modal’s ability to modify events. This major change in its event structure causes the modal to extend its scope from events over propositions. This assumption is confirmed throughout by the fact that early em contained by the corpus exploited here only combine with predicates lacking event arguments, whereas rm never do. Finally, the theory offered here provides an interesting link between formal accounts and functional ones: Considering rm as event modifier, it explains why they are always “action oriented”, as commonly assumed by most functionalist approaches.

Abstract

As Abraham (1990, 1991, 2005) has pointed out, aspect plays a crucial role, when epistemic modals (em) emerge out of root modals (rm). The present paper shows that the different aspectual preferences of those items are reflected by the differences in the configuration of the modal’s event structure: whereas rm turn out to be event modifiers, em are propositional modifiers. In technical detail, rm select infinitival complements involving an event argument and assign to them a interval posterior to utterance time. em, on the other hand, can combine with any non-finite complement that constitutes a licit proposition. This paper will discuss some data from German that shows that rm are indeed event modifiers since they (1) fail to embed predicates that lack event arguments and (2) are bound to complements with future orientation. The grammaticalisation of em then can be considered as a decline of the modal’s ability to modify events. This major change in its event structure causes the modal to extend its scope from events over propositions. This assumption is confirmed throughout by the fact that early em contained by the corpus exploited here only combine with predicates lacking event arguments, whereas rm never do. Finally, the theory offered here provides an interesting link between formal accounts and functional ones: Considering rm as event modifier, it explains why they are always “action oriented”, as commonly assumed by most functionalist approaches.

Kapitel in diesem Buch

  1. Prelim pages i
  2. Table of contents v
  3. List of contributors vii
  4. Preface ix
  5. Introduction: Aspect-modality interfaces and interchanges across languages xi
  6. General
  7. On the logic of generalizations about cross-linguistic aspect-modality links 3
  8. The silent and aspect-driven patterns of deonticity and epistemicity: A chapter in diachronic typology 15
  9. Propositional aspect and the development of modal inferences in English 43
  10. Towards an understanding of the progressive form in English: The Imperative as a heuristic tool 81
  11. Epistemic modality and aspect contingency in Armenian, Russian, and German 97
  12. Slavic
  13. Indefiniteness and imperfectivity as micro-grammatical contexts of epistemicity in German-Slovene translations 119
  14. The connections between modality, aspectuality, and temporality in Modern Russian 147
  15. Aspectual coercion in Bulgarian negative imperatives 175
  16. Russian modals možet 'can' and dolžen 'must' selecting the imperfective in negative contexts 197
  17. African
  18. Tense, mood, and aspect in Gungbe (Kwa) 215
  19. The modal system of the Igbo language 241
  20. Asian
  21. The aspect-modality link in the Japanese verbal complex and beyond 279
  22. The aspect-modality link in Japanese: The case of the evaluating sentence 309
  23. Amerindian
  24. The Lakota aspect/modality markers - kinica and tkhá 331
  25. Creole
  26. A note on modality and aspect in Saramaccan 359
  27. Diachronic
  28. Aspects of a reconstruction of form and function of modal verbs in Germanic and other languages 371
  29. The autopsy of a modal – insights from the historical development of German 385
  30. Index of authors 417
  31. Index of subjects 419
Heruntergeladen am 21.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/tsl.79.27mac/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen