Home Linguistics & Semiotics Complexity trade-offs in core argument marking
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Complexity trade-offs in core argument marking

  • Kaius Sinnemäki
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Language Complexity
This chapter is in the book Language Complexity

Abstract

Languages have often been claimed to trade off complexity in one area with simplicity in another. The present paper tests this claim with a complexity metric based on the functional load of different coding strategies (head/dependent marking and word order) that interact in core argument marking. Data from a sample of 50 languages showed that the functional use of word order had a statistically significant inverse dependency with the presence of morphological marking, especially with dependent marking. Most other dependencies were far from statistical significance and in fact provide evidence against the trade-off claim, leading to its rejection as a general all-encompassing principle. Overall, languages seem to adhere more strongly to distinctiveness than to economy.

Abstract

Languages have often been claimed to trade off complexity in one area with simplicity in another. The present paper tests this claim with a complexity metric based on the functional load of different coding strategies (head/dependent marking and word order) that interact in core argument marking. Data from a sample of 50 languages showed that the functional use of word order had a statistically significant inverse dependency with the presence of morphological marking, especially with dependent marking. Most other dependencies were far from statistical significance and in fact provide evidence against the trade-off claim, leading to its rejection as a general all-encompassing principle. Overall, languages seem to adhere more strongly to distinctiveness than to economy.

Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/slcs.94.06sin/html
Scroll to top button