Presented to you through Paradigm Publishing Services

John Benjamins Publishing Company

Visit our Partner Page See all our books
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Between predicative and attributive possession in Bashkir

  • and

Abstract

Bashkir employs the genitive strategy for predicative possessive construction (‘he has a car’ literally is ‘his car exists’). However, in predicative possessive constructions the genitival possessor shows syntactic properties that are mostly indicative of its clause-level status. Some other uses with genitival possessors (as in e.g. ‘his leg hurts’) show mixed behaviour with respect to various constituency-related tests. The distribution of these properties directly reflects the degree of the relevance of the possessor. This semantics-to-syntax link is reminiscent of the external vs. internal possessor contrasts in other languages, although normally these contrasts are also manifested morphologically. The fact that constituency tests do not converge on identical results calls into question the applicability of the traditional notion of constituency to Bashkir possessive constructions.

Abstract

Bashkir employs the genitive strategy for predicative possessive construction (‘he has a car’ literally is ‘his car exists’). However, in predicative possessive constructions the genitival possessor shows syntactic properties that are mostly indicative of its clause-level status. Some other uses with genitival possessors (as in e.g. ‘his leg hurts’) show mixed behaviour with respect to various constituency-related tests. The distribution of these properties directly reflects the degree of the relevance of the possessor. This semantics-to-syntax link is reminiscent of the external vs. internal possessor contrasts in other languages, although normally these contrasts are also manifested morphologically. The fact that constituency tests do not converge on identical results calls into question the applicability of the traditional notion of constituency to Bashkir possessive constructions.

Chapters in this book

  1. Prelim pages i
  2. Table of contents v
  3. List of contributors vii
  4. Preface ix
  5. Introduction xi
  6. I. Verbal Categories and Processes in Categorizations
  7. The tense-aspect system of Khorchin Mongolian 3
  8. Locational and directional relations and tense and aspect marking in Chalkan, a South Siberian Turkic language 67
  9. Conspiring motivations for causative and passive isomorphism: 91
  10. II. Syntactic Functions and Case-Marking
  11. Spatial semantics, case and relator nouns in Evenki 111
  12. A survey of alignment features in the Greater Hindukush with special references to Indo-Aryan 133
  13. Between predicative and attributive possession in Bashkir 175
  14. III. Clause Combining and Discourse
  15. Areal features of copula sentences in Karaim as spoken in Lithuania 205
  16. Non-past copular markers in Turkish 221
  17. On the distribution of the contrastive-concessive discourse connectives ama ‘but/yet’ and fakat ‘but’ in written Turkish 251
  18. Anaphora in Ossetic correlatives and the typology of clause combining 275
  19. Kinds of evidentiality in German complement clauses 311
  20. Evidentiality in Dzungar Tuvan 339
  21. IV. Historical Issues
  22. On the evolution of Russian subject reference 381
  23. The development of negation in the Transeurasian languages 401
  24. List of Index 421
On Diversity and Complexity of Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia
This chapter is in the book On Diversity and Complexity of Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.164.06ovs

Chapters in this book

  1. Prelim pages i
  2. Table of contents v
  3. List of contributors vii
  4. Preface ix
  5. Introduction xi
  6. I. Verbal Categories and Processes in Categorizations
  7. The tense-aspect system of Khorchin Mongolian 3
  8. Locational and directional relations and tense and aspect marking in Chalkan, a South Siberian Turkic language 67
  9. Conspiring motivations for causative and passive isomorphism: 91
  10. II. Syntactic Functions and Case-Marking
  11. Spatial semantics, case and relator nouns in Evenki 111
  12. A survey of alignment features in the Greater Hindukush with special references to Indo-Aryan 133
  13. Between predicative and attributive possession in Bashkir 175
  14. III. Clause Combining and Discourse
  15. Areal features of copula sentences in Karaim as spoken in Lithuania 205
  16. Non-past copular markers in Turkish 221
  17. On the distribution of the contrastive-concessive discourse connectives ama ‘but/yet’ and fakat ‘but’ in written Turkish 251
  18. Anaphora in Ossetic correlatives and the typology of clause combining 275
  19. Kinds of evidentiality in German complement clauses 311
  20. Evidentiality in Dzungar Tuvan 339
  21. IV. Historical Issues
  22. On the evolution of Russian subject reference 381
  23. The development of negation in the Transeurasian languages 401
  24. List of Index 421
Downloaded on 10.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/slcs.164.06ovs/html
Scroll to top button