Home Chapter 8. Vagueness explored
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 8. Vagueness explored

The role of comment clauses
  • Maria Cristina Lo Baido
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Vagueness, Ambiguity, and All the Rest
This chapter is in the book Vagueness, Ambiguity, and All the Rest

Abstract

The paper sets out to explore the function of vagueness served by comment clauses in Italian, that is, (de-)verbal parentheticals performing various meta-discursive functions. Meta-discourse reflects the expression of speaker’s comment on discourse to different levels ranging from the communication of epistemic commitment to the encoding of an attitude of mirativity and emphasis. In this paper I address meta-discourse that is expressed by comment clauses that assist the speaker in the communication of informative, relational, and discursive vagueness. Specifically, the strategies here investigated indicate a relation of underspecification between the speaker and the formulation to different degrees pertaining to approximation, expression of epistemic stance, categorisation of reference via exemplification, attenuation of speaker’s force, and on-line planning. I argue that vagueness should be related to the expression of speaker’s subjectivity and indexicality, as the performing of this function helps the speaker contextualising the interpretation of various stretches of discourse.

Abstract

The paper sets out to explore the function of vagueness served by comment clauses in Italian, that is, (de-)verbal parentheticals performing various meta-discursive functions. Meta-discourse reflects the expression of speaker’s comment on discourse to different levels ranging from the communication of epistemic commitment to the encoding of an attitude of mirativity and emphasis. In this paper I address meta-discourse that is expressed by comment clauses that assist the speaker in the communication of informative, relational, and discursive vagueness. Specifically, the strategies here investigated indicate a relation of underspecification between the speaker and the formulation to different degrees pertaining to approximation, expression of epistemic stance, categorisation of reference via exemplification, attenuation of speaker’s force, and on-line planning. I argue that vagueness should be related to the expression of speaker’s subjectivity and indexicality, as the performing of this function helps the speaker contextualising the interpretation of various stretches of discourse.

Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/pbns.347.08bai/html
Scroll to top button