Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik Parsing, pragmatics, and representation
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Parsing, pragmatics, and representation

Children’s comprehension of two-clause questions
  • Jill G. de Villiers , Jessica Kotfila und Madeline Klein
Weitere Titel anzeigen von John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract

How do young children comprehend wh-questions from two-clause sentences? Is it via parsing heuristics like first resort, or different grammars, or the question-under-discussion? Fifty preschool children and twenty-three adults gave answers to nine adjunct wh-questions from sentences with false complements. The effects of verb and wh-question were tested on the type of answer children give: short distance, long distance, and reality answers, which link the wh only to the embedded verb. Neither children nor adults preferred to fill the first gap, but adults and children differed in the likelihood of a reality answer. This answer type was linked to children’s language skill assessed by another index. The disparities in various theoretical positions and research findings are then discussed. Differences in the form of the sentences used across the laboratories point to a new explanation for the disparity between the different results.

Abstract

How do young children comprehend wh-questions from two-clause sentences? Is it via parsing heuristics like first resort, or different grammars, or the question-under-discussion? Fifty preschool children and twenty-three adults gave answers to nine adjunct wh-questions from sentences with false complements. The effects of verb and wh-question were tested on the type of answer children give: short distance, long distance, and reality answers, which link the wh only to the embedded verb. Neither children nor adults preferred to fill the first gap, but adults and children differed in the likelihood of a reality answer. This answer type was linked to children’s language skill assessed by another index. The disparities in various theoretical positions and research findings are then discussed. Differences in the form of the sentences used across the laboratories point to a new explanation for the disparity between the different results.

Heruntergeladen am 9.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/lald.63.05vil/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen