Chapter 4. The role of language analytic ability in the effectiveness of different feedback timing conditions
-
Diana C. Arroyo
and Yucel Yilmaz
Abstract
This chapter describes an empirical study that investigated the role of language analytic ability (LAA) in the effectiveness of feedback under two timing conditions, and whether the timing conditions were differentially effective after controlling for LAA. Forty-five Spanish learners were randomly assigned to three groups: immediate feedback, delayed feedback, and control. All learners completed an information-gap task with a native speaker of Spanish through synchronous computer-mediated communication. Learners’ errors on Spanish noun-adjective gender agreement were treated according to their group assignment. Learners’ knowledge of the linguistic target was assessed by means of oral production and grammaticality judgment tests. Language analytic ability was measured with LLAMA F, a subtest of the LLAMA Language Aptitude Tests (Meara, 2005). Results revealed that LAA did not play any role in the effectiveness of either feedback timing condition, and immediate feedback was more effective than delayed feedback after controlling for LAA.
Abstract
This chapter describes an empirical study that investigated the role of language analytic ability (LAA) in the effectiveness of feedback under two timing conditions, and whether the timing conditions were differentially effective after controlling for LAA. Forty-five Spanish learners were randomly assigned to three groups: immediate feedback, delayed feedback, and control. All learners completed an information-gap task with a native speaker of Spanish through synchronous computer-mediated communication. Learners’ errors on Spanish noun-adjective gender agreement were treated according to their group assignment. Learners’ knowledge of the linguistic target was assessed by means of oral production and grammaticality judgment tests. Language analytic ability was measured with LLAMA F, a subtest of the LLAMA Language Aptitude Tests (Meara, 2005). Results revealed that LAA did not play any role in the effectiveness of either feedback timing condition, and immediate feedback was more effective than delayed feedback after controlling for LAA.
Chapters in this book
- Prelim pages i
- Table of contents vii
- Acknowledgements ix
- List of contributors xi
-
Introduction
- Chapter 1. Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach 3
-
Learners
- Chapter 2. Overview of learner individual differences and their mediating effects on the process and outcome of L2 interaction 19
- Chapter 3. The effects of cognitive aptitudes on the process and product of L2 interaction 41
- Chapter 4. The role of language analytic ability in the effectiveness of different feedback timing conditions 71
- Chapter 5. Gender and recasts 99
- Chapter 6. Interaction and phonetic form in task completion 121
-
Instructors
- Chapter 7. Instructor individual characteristics and L2 interaction 151
- Chapter 8. Vietnamese TESOL teachers’ cognitions and practices 173
- Chapter 9. Investigating the relationship between instructor research training and pronunciation-related instruction and oral corrective feedback 201
- Chapter 10. Linguistic variation in instructor provision of oral input 225
- Chapter 11. Teachers’ provision of feedback in L2 text-chat 255
- Chapter 12. Preservice instructors’ performance on a language learning task 281
-
Other interlocutors
- Chapter 13. Look who’s interacting 305
- Index 325
Chapters in this book
- Prelim pages i
- Table of contents vii
- Acknowledgements ix
- List of contributors xi
-
Introduction
- Chapter 1. Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach 3
-
Learners
- Chapter 2. Overview of learner individual differences and their mediating effects on the process and outcome of L2 interaction 19
- Chapter 3. The effects of cognitive aptitudes on the process and product of L2 interaction 41
- Chapter 4. The role of language analytic ability in the effectiveness of different feedback timing conditions 71
- Chapter 5. Gender and recasts 99
- Chapter 6. Interaction and phonetic form in task completion 121
-
Instructors
- Chapter 7. Instructor individual characteristics and L2 interaction 151
- Chapter 8. Vietnamese TESOL teachers’ cognitions and practices 173
- Chapter 9. Investigating the relationship between instructor research training and pronunciation-related instruction and oral corrective feedback 201
- Chapter 10. Linguistic variation in instructor provision of oral input 225
- Chapter 11. Teachers’ provision of feedback in L2 text-chat 255
- Chapter 12. Preservice instructors’ performance on a language learning task 281
-
Other interlocutors
- Chapter 13. Look who’s interacting 305
- Index 325