Home Importance of early diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS-1 and CRPS-2): Delayed diagnosis of CRPS is a major problem
Article Publicly Available

Importance of early diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS-1 and CRPS-2): Delayed diagnosis of CRPS is a major problem

  • Harald Breivik EMAIL logo and Audun Stubhaug
Published/Copyright: April 1, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

In this issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Pain Lars Kristian Lunden, Inge Petter Kleggetveit, and Ellenjørum publish an important retrospective analysis of patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS-1 and CRPS-2) who had been referred for expert evaluation of chronic pain conditions [1]. Ellen Jørum’s Section of Clinical Neurophysiology at the Department of Neurology of Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet is a tertiary referral centre for a large part of South-Eastern Norway [1].

1 Lunden et al. [1] have two important messages to the readers

1.1 There is a lack of knowledge about CRPS and this delays diagnosis and treatment

Unfortunately, primary care physicians as well as hospital-based specialists still too often do not recognize a CRPS. This results in delayed diagnosis of CRPS and delays in appropriate treatment. The longer a CRPS lasts without helpful treatment, the more complex the pain condition becomes due to secondary complications. Treatment becomes even less effective when diagnosis is delayed. Normalization of functions and pain hypersensitivity of the CRPS-limb takes longer, at best. Some of these patients will suffer an intractable pain condition for many years. In their study Lunden et al. [1] found that mean time from injury until CRPS-diagnosis was almost 4 years, ranging from 0.5 to 10 years.

1.2 Exploratory surgery in CRPS is contraindicated

In a well-intended attempt to find a cause of the pain, patients with an unrecognized CRPS after an injury, or an operation, risk being exposed to exploratory surgery. Often this aggravates the CRPS-pain and cause more loss of function. In their review of 55 patients with CRPS, Lunden et al. [1] found that 27 patients had surgery for the pain condition or reoperation when an operation had precipitated the CRPS. A typical scenario is a sprained ankle that precipitates CRPS, followed by an ankle-arthroscopy with partial synovectomy – and subsequent a much worse pain in an ankle and foot that the patient cannot stand on. In their study, patients were operated from 0.5 to several years after the initial precipitating injury [1]. Twenty-two of the 27 patients (81%) had worse pain after surgery, only one had less pain after surgery. None of these 27 CRPS-patients were diagnosed with CRPS before their operation or reoperation [1].

2 CRPS is not a rare pain condition – so why is it not recognized?

A thorough epidemiological study from the Netherlands documented an incidence rate of 26 per 100,000 persons per year with a 95% confidence interval of 23-30 [2]. If this is true in Norway as well, we should have between 1000 and 1500 new cases of CRPS every year. Women are at least 3 times more likely to develop CRPS than men. Injury or surgery causes about 90%, whereas in 10% there is no known precipitating cause. Fractures are the most common inciting causes (almost half). The highest incidence was among females in the age group 61–70 years [2]. The prognosis is often better for CRPS after a fracture – around 75% being mostly pain free after one year (for references, see [3,4]). After 5 years, about 15% still have CRPS that is difficult to treat [4].

The reason diagnosis is not made early is that there is lack of knowledge about this enigmatic pain condition: Health care providers are as other people: We see only what we are looking for. Those who have not heard about CRPS, will not be able to recognize CRPS. Delayed diagnosis of CRPS is a problem in children as well [5].

3 IASP-diagnostic criteria (for references see [6,7])

  1. The patient has continuous pain, often disproportionate to any inciting event

  2. Patient must report at least 1 symptom in 3 of the 4 categories below:

    1. Sensory symptoms: Patient reports hyperesthesia and/or allodynia

    2. Vasomotor symptoms: Patient reports temperature asymmetry and/or skin colour-changes and/or colour asymmetry

    3. Sudomotor or oedema symptoms: Patient reports oedema and/or sweating changes and/or sweating asymmetry

    4. Motor or trophic symptoms: Patient reports decreased range of motion and/or motor dysfunction e.g. weakness, tremor, dystonia, and/or trophic changes in hair, nails, skin.

  3. Must show at least 1 sign in 2 or more of the following 4 categories:

    1. Sensory signs: hyperalgesia to pinprick, allodynia to light touch or joint movement

    2. Vasomotor signs: temperature asymmetry or skin colour asymmetry

    3. Sudomotor or oedema signs: oedema and/or sweating asymmetry

    4. Motor or trophic signs: decreased range of motion, and/or muscle weakness, tremor, dystonia, and/or trophic changes of hair, nails, skin.

  4. No other diagnosis better explains the symptoms and signs.

4 There is no medical cure for CRPS. So why worry about delayed diagnosis?

Because we still do not fully understand the aetiology and pathogenic mechanisms of CRPS [6] there is no curative treatment [3]. CRPS-patients have pain that is often disproportionate to the precipitating cause, and functions of the limb deteriorate. They feel stigmatized by health care providers who do not believe that their pain condition is “real”. It is clear that CRPS is not associated with preceding psychological problems, with somatisation, or with malingering [3]. However, even in psychologically sound persons who are unlucky enough to develop CRPS after trauma or surgery will experience psychological distress. They soon will be afraid of using the limb, pain on motion increases, and a number of socioeconomic problems follow. Psychological problems are difficult to avoid when living with unexplained pain in a useless limb.

Early diagnosis and treatment can prevent these secondary complications of untreated CRPS-conditions. In the majority of patients, nature’s healing processes can then go on so that normal and painless functions are restored in the limb [3,7].

5 Early diagnosis and the goals of early treatment

The main goal of treatment of CRPS is to reduce or prevent the secondary complications of CRPS. Patients with CRPS-1 or CRPS-2 are treated with the same approach, outcome being about the same.

5.1 Obviously mild cases

Obviously mild cases (e.g. after a wrist fracture) can be treated in primary care with physiotherapy focusing on restoration of function and with antihyperalgesic drugs (gabapentin or pregabalin). Paracetamol with or without codeine or tramadol may be helpful before physiotherapy. Potent opioids should be avoided.

5.2 The four pillars of treatment for complex regional pain syndrome of the 2012 UK-guidelines [3]

In the following we cite the abbreviated recommendations from the 2012 UK – NICE-guidelines [7] as summarized in [3].

5.2.1 Patient information and education [3]

This clearly is very important. Patients need to know as much as possible of the known facts about CRPS and what the goals of treatment are. Patients should be reassured that physical and occupational therapies are safe and appropriate. The full UK-guidelines from 2012 have a sample of a patient-information sheet [3,7]. At the Department ofPain Management and Research, at Oslo University Hospital has a similar information document in the Norwegian language.

5.2.2 Pain relief with medication and procedures [3]

No specific drugs are recommended because of lack of solid evidence, but drugs recommended for neuropathic pain may be considered, an up-dated guide for such drugs were recently published by Nanna B Finnerup et al. [8].

Spinal Cord Stimulation may be tried when other treatments have failed.

5.3.3 Physical and vocational rehabilitation [3]

Physical rehabilitation should be delivered by therapists competent in treating patients with chronic pain and CRPS. This is important. Emphasis should be on restoration of normal function and activities through acquisition of self-management skills, with patients and their families actively engaged in goal-setting.

Specialised techniques to address altered perception and awareness of the limb, e.g:

  • Self-administered desensitization with tactile and thermal stimuli

  • Functional movement to improve motor control and limb position awareness

  • Graded motor imagery, mirror visual feedback, mental visualization

  • Management of CRPS-related dystonia

5.2.4 Psychological interventions [3]

Psychological intervention is based on individualized assessment, to identify and proactively manage any factors which may perpetuate pain or disability, or dependency including:

  • Mood evaluation—management of anxiety and depression

  • Internal factors, e.g. counter-productive behaviour patterns

  • Any external influences or perverse incentives

This follows principles of cognitive behavioural therapy delivering:

  • Coping skills and positive thought patterns

  • Support for family and carers to manage their own needs and to maintain relationships.

6 Conclusions and implications of the Lunden and co-workers, study [1]

Complex regional pain syndrome in spite of advances in understanding aspects of the pathogenic mechanisms [4,6], remains an enigma, patients with CRPS and their carers experience a conundrum of symptoms and signs, therapies are mainly focused on relieving some of the symptoms and preventing exacerbations of the pain condition by secondary complications of physical and psycho-social nature. The publication in this issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Pain by Lars Kristian Lunden, Inge Petter Kleggetveit and Ellenjørum [1] is an important reminder that lack of knowledge about CRPS among professionals in primary and secondary health care is widespread in Norway. This causes delayed diagnosis and often un-helpful attempts to find a cause by doing surgery.

Their study, therefore, is an important wake-up call to do better. CRPS, even CRPS-2 with an obvious damage to a peripheral nerve, is not typical neuropathic pain. Still, the recently establish National Centre of Competence in Neuropathic Pain at the Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, will have to focus also on acquisition and dispersion of knowledge about CRPS—about precipitating events, pathogenic mechanisms and treatment.


DOI of refers to article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2015.11.004.



Oslo University Hospital, Department of Pain Management and Research, P.O.Box 4950 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway. Tel.:+47 23073691; fax: +47 23073690

  1. Conflict of interest: None declared.

References

[1] Lunden LK, Kleggetveit IP, Jørum E. Delayed diagnosis and worsening of pain following orthopedic surgery in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Scan J Pain 2016;11:27–33, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2015.11.004.Search in Google Scholar

[2] de Mos M, de BruijnAG, Huygen FJ, Dieleman JP, Stricker BH, Sturkenboom MC. The incidence of complex regional pain syndrome: a population-based study. Pain 2007;129:12–20.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Turner-Stokes L, Goebel A. Complex regional pain syndrome in adults: concise guidance. Clin Med 2011;11:596–600.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bruehl S. Complex regional pain syndrome. BMJ 2015;350:h2730.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Liossi C, Clinch J, Howard R. Need for early recognition and multidisciplinary management of paediatric complex regional pain syndrome. Brit Med J 2015;351:h4748.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Birklein F, Schlereth T. Complex regional pain syndrome—significant progress in understanding. Pain 2015;156:S94–103.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Goebel A, Barker CH, Turener-Stokes I, on behalf of the guideline development group. Complex regional pain syndrome in adults: UK guidelines for diagnosis referral and management in primary and secondary care. London: Royal College ofPhysicians; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Finnerup NB, Attal N, Haroutounian S, McNicol E, Baron R, Dworkin RH, Gilron I, Haanpää M, Hansson P, Jensen TS, Kamerman PR, Lund K, Moore A, Raja SN, Rice AS, Rowbotham M, Sena E, Siddall P, Smith BH, Wallace M. Pharmacotherapy forneuropathic pain in adults: asystematic review and metaanalysis. Lancet Neurol 2015;14:162–73, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70251-0.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-04-01
Published in Print: 2016-04-01

© 2015 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Editorial comment
  2. Psychophysiological effects of threatening a rubber hand that is perceptually embodied in healthy human subjects
  3. Original experimental
  4. A preliminary investigation into psychophysiological effects of threatening a perceptually embodied rubber hand in healthy human participants
  5. Editorial comment
  6. Analysis of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in pain patients – Can biomarker studies lead to better understanding of the pathophysiology of pain?
  7. Clinical pain research
  8. Serum C-reactive protein levels predict regional brain responses to noxious cold stimulation of the hand in chronic whiplash associated disorders
  9. Editorial comment
  10. Importance of early diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS-1 and CRPS-2): Delayed diagnosis of CRPS is a major problem
  11. Clinical pain research
  12. Delayed diagnosis and worsening of pain following orthopedic surgery in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS)
  13. Editorial comment
  14. Associative learning mechanisms may trigger increased burden of chronic pain; unlearning and extinguishing learned maladaptive responses should help chronic pain patients
  15. Original experimental
  16. When touch predicts pain: predictive tactile cues modulate perceived intensity of painful stimulation independent of expectancy
  17. Editorial comment
  18. Low back pain among nurses: Common cause of lost days at work and contributing to the worldwide shortage of nurses
  19. Observational study
  20. Pain-related factors associated with lost work days in nurses with low back pain: A cross-sectional study
  21. Editorial comment
  22. Assessment of persistent pelvic pain after hysterectomy: Neuropathic or nociceptive?
  23. Clinical pain research
  24. Characterization of persistent pain after hysterectomy based on gynaecological and sensory examination
  25. Editorial comment
  26. Transmucosal fentanyl for severe cancer pain: Nasal mucosa superior to oral mucosa?
  27. Original experimental
  28. Facilitation of accurate and effective radiation therapy using fentanyl pectin nasal spray (FPNS) to reduce incidental breakthrough pain due to procedure positioning
  29. Editorial comment
  30. Why do we have opioid-receptors in peripheral tissues? Not for relief of pain by opioids
  31. Clinical pain research
  32. Peripheral morphine reduces acute pain in inflamed tissue after third molar extraction: A double-blind, randomized, active-controlled clinical trial
  33. Editorial comment
  34. Chronic pain and psychological distress among long-term social assistance recipients – An intolerable burden on those on the lowest steps of the socioeconomic ladder
  35. Clinical pain research
  36. The co-occurrence of chronic pain and psychological distress and its associations with salient socio-demographic characteristics among long-term social assistance recipients in Norway
  37. Editorial comment
  38. Fifty years on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain-intensity is still good for acute pain. But multidimensional assessment is needed for chronic pain
  39. Clinical pain research
  40. Patient reported outcome measures of pain intensity: Do they tell us what we need to know?
  41. Editorial comment
  42. Postoperative pain documentation 30 years after
  43. Topical review
  44. Postoperative pain documentation in a hospital setting: A topical review
  45. Editorial comment
  46. Aspects of pain attitudes and pain beliefs in children: Clinical importance and validity
  47. Observational study
  48. The Survey of Pain Attitudes: A revised version of its pediatric form
  49. Editorial comment
  50. The role of social anxiety in chronic pain and the return-to-work process
  51. Clinical pain research
  52. Social Anxiety, Pain Catastrophizing and Return-To-Work Self-Efficacy in chronic pain: a cross-sectional study
  53. Editorial comment
  54. Advances in understanding and treatment of opioid-induced-bowel-dysfunction, opioid-induced-constipation in particular Nordic recommendations based on multi-specialist input
  55. Topical review
  56. Definition, diagnosis and treatment strategies for opioid-induced bowel dysfunction–Recommendations of the Nordic Working Group
  57. Observational study
  58. Opioid-induced constipation, use of laxatives, and health-related quality of life
  59. Editorial comment
  60. Migraine headache and bipolar disorders: Common comorbidities
  61. Systematic review
  62. Migraine headache and bipolar disorder comorbidity: A systematic review of the literature and clinical implications
  63. Editorial comment
  64. The role of catastrophizing in the pain–depression relationship
  65. Clinical pain research
  66. The mediating role of catastrophizing in the relationship between pain intensity and depressed mood in older adults with persistent pain: A longitudinal analysis
  67. Announcement
  68. May 26-27, 2016 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain, Reykjavik, Iceland May 25, 2016 PhD course
Downloaded on 13.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1016/j.sjpain.2015.11.009/html
Scroll to top button