Home Medicine The influence of personality traits on perception of pain in older adults – Findings from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care – Blekinge study
Article Publicly Available

The influence of personality traits on perception of pain in older adults – Findings from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care – Blekinge study

  • Lena Sandin Wranker EMAIL logo , Mikael Rennemark , Sölve Elmståhl and Johan Berglund
Published/Copyright: April 1, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Background and aims

The experience of pain may vary in accordance with personality traits and individual characteristics. Neuroticism is demonstrated to constitute a vulnerability factor among younger and middle-aged pain patients. The combination of openness and neuroticism is associated with high anxiety/depression scores among adult individuals with chronic conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate possible associations between pain and the personality dimensions of neuroticism, extroversion, openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness among persons aged 60 years and older. An additional aim was to explore whether such associations are equally gender expressed.

Methods

The Swedish National Study on Aging and Care includes a randomly selected sample from the National Population Register. The data collection was conducted at four research centres and was approved by the Ethics Committees of Lund University and the Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. The Blekinge sample includes 1402 individuals, aged 60–96 years, of whom 769 (55%) reported pain. A total of 2312 individuals had been invited to participate. The reason for non-participation was registered. Participants underwent medical examination and testing by research personnel, conducted in two sessions, each of which lasted about 3 h. A questionnaire was completed between the two sessions. Pain was self-reported and based on the question: Have you had ache/pain during the last 4 weeks? Information on personality traits was obtained by means of the personality SGC1 questionnaire; a 60-item Swedish version of Costa & McCrae’s FFM questionnaire. Personality traits were then tested based on gender by means of multivariate forward logistic regression in models adjusted for age, insomnia, financial status and educational level.

Results

When adjusting for covariates among women, neuroticism had a small but significant odds ratio of experiencing pain (OR 1.05, CI 1.02–1.08). Insomnia had the highest odds ratio (OR 2.19, CI 1.52–3.15) followed by low education (OR 1.59, CI 1.07–2.36), while belonging to the younger part of the older adult cohort was also associated with pain (OR 1.02, CI 1.005–1.04). In men, neuroticism (OR 1.03, CI 1.002–1.06) followed by openness (OR 1.03 CI 1.001–1.07) had a small but significant odds ratio of experiencing pain. Insomnia had the highest odds ratio (OR 1.98, CI 1.24–3.15).

Conclusions

Personality traits and pain were related among the older adults but there were gender differences. The relationship between pain and neuroticism in women was about the same in strength as the relation between pain and neuroticism/openness in men. Both sexes suffer from insomnia. The relationship between personality traits and pain was only affected to a minor extent by insomnia.

Implications

There is a need to increase awareness of the impact of personality as well as to provide improved treatment for pain and insomnia in older people.

1 Introduction

The experience of pain is associated with tissue damage or described in terms of such damage [1]. As pain includes both sensory and emotional components, personality affects the experience of pain [2]. Research on twins suggests that the perception of pain is related to personality [3].

Personality factors have a greater influence on suffering than on pain intensity [4]. The ways individuals differ are summarized in the five factor theory of personality (FFT): Neuroticism (), Extraversion (E), Openness (O), Agreeableness (A) and Conscientiousness (C) [5]. The FFT is a model for investigating the relationship between personality and health [6].

N represents the individual’s tendency to feel nervous, worry and wish to avoid harm. Psychological distress has a strong association with N [7]. In adult fibromyalgia patients (24-62 years) N was found to have a strong connection with both pain catastrophizing and pain anxiety [8]. N is associated with unpleasantness but not with pain intensity [4].

E is characterized by being social and willing to enter into contact with others. In a study of adults aged 60 and over, this trait was reported to be high among the oldest old and, together with other factors, suggested as contributing to the rapidly increasing rate of very old people [9]. The study found associations between E and adaptation to the challenges of the oldest old [9]. Although the association between E and longevity has been discussed, no evidence has been found when comparing younger and older individuals as in the Health and Lifestyle survey [10].

Imagination, aesthetic sensitivity, attentiveness to inner feelings and intellectually curiosity is one description of the trait O, which has also been described as a source of life satisfaction after retirement [11]. Individuals with this trait wish for sensory stimulation, such as viewing art, listening to music, reading literature and poetry, as well as variety in everyday life. Individuals with a low score on this trait are considered conventional and traditional. The combination of O and N was found to be associated with high anxiety/depression scores among individuals with chronic conditions [12].

Individuals who have a high score on A usually have positive social interactions, cooperate well in groups and help others. A has been related to sadness in a study including both younger and older adults in the USA [13]. Another characteristic of A is the tendency to be compassionate, although A was found to be negatively related to distress in an interpersonal context in patients with low back pain [14].

Characteristics of trait C include competence, self-discipline and impulse control. This trait is often common among people with a healthy life-style, i.e. individuals who normally exercise and avoid excessive alcohol consumption and smoking. The use of Health Care, i.e. annual check-ups and compliance with doctors’ advice, can to some extent explain the relationship between C and perceived health among the older adults [15]. Individuals who have a high score on C tend to be organized, a typical characteristic of this group being to-do lists. They tend to be happy with life and the C-trait is considered to have a positive relationship with subjective well-being. C is a predictor of longevity, even when adjusted for gender and educational level [16].

It has been suggested that personality traits influence psychosocial functioning in patients with pain. N was demonstrated to constitute a vulnerability factor, predisposing patients to greater fear of pain and higher pain severity [17]. Martinez et al. concluded that N and C were predictors of pain catastrophizing and that N, O, and A were significant predictors of pain anxiety [8]. Psychological treatment provides the same level of pain relief as surgery among low back pain patients with high N scores [18]. In the past decade, the FFT of personality has gained wide acceptance [19]. A vulnerability model indicated an increase in the risk of N in individuals with low educational level [20]. Higher levels of E and C may be associated with a reduced risk of disability in old age [21].

Insomnia and age are associated with pain [22]. Financial status has been demonstrated to be associated with pain experience. Education is related to personality and could be assumed to be associated with pain [23]. In 2003 about 15.9% of adults in Sweden had studied at university level [24]. Insomnia has been shown to relate to quality of life (QoL) among men [22,25]. Women more often complain of insomnia but research has suggested that this may be caused by behavioural factors [26]. All types of insomnia are prevalent in the geriatric population [27]. Coping strategies vary according to personality trait, thus insomnia is assumed to be associated with personality [28].

The aim of the present study was to, in a gender perspective, investigate possible associations between perceived pain and the personality among persons aged 60 years and older.

2 Methods

2.1 Sample

Participants were recruited from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care (SNAC), a national multicentre study following a representative randomized sample of older adults over time. Full details of the study structure, design, population and recruitment have been described by Lagergren et al. [29].The SNAC baseline data collection was conducted in 2001-2003 as a longitudinal study of age-stratified older adults in various (10) age cohorts (60, 66, 72, 78, 81, 84, 87, 90, 93, 96 years). The SNAC is conducted at four research centres and approved by the Ethics Committees of the Medical Faculty at Lund University and the Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Informed consent was obtained from each participant.

The present participants were recruited from the SNAC sample at SNAC-Blekinge (B) in Karlskrona, one of the four research centres. Karlskrona is a medium sized town with rural surroundings situated in south-eastern Sweden.

To obtain a representative sample of the population of older adults, 2312 subjects were contacted, of whom 1402 (61%) agreed to participate. Of the 910 subjects who declined to participate, 755 (83%) stated that they had no interest and 91 (10%) mentioned comorbidity (feeling too sick). An additional 64 (7%) subjects could not be contacted. The SNAC-B respondents (n = 1402), 585 men and 817 women, are considered representative of the geriatric Swedish population and resemble the other rural and urban sub-samples of the total SNAC study in terms of age, gender and functional ability [29].

2.2 Procedure

Potential participants were invited by letter to take part in the study. Those who agreed were tested every month during the data collection period, which comprised the 6 weeks before as well as after their birthday, in order to avoid systematically exceeding their nominal age. They also underwent medical examination and testing by research personnel, conducted in two sessions, each of which lasted about 3 h. The participants completed a questionnaire between the two sessions. The research personnel offered to carry out the investigation in the participants’ homes if they were unable to travel to the research centre. A release form allowing access to medical records and informed consent were also obtained.

2.3 Measures

The independent variable pain was self-reported and based on the question: Have you had an ache/pain during the last 4 weeks? The response alternatives were ‘Yes’ and ‘No’.

Pain intensity was based on self-estimation on a VAS-scale from 0 to 10 with millimetre intervals [30]. The pain intensity values were mild (VAS = 0–3.99), moderate (VAS = 4.00–6.99) and severe pain (VAS = 7.00–10.00).

Information on personality traits was obtained by means of the personality SGC1 questionnaire, a 60-item Swedish version of Costa & McCrae’s FFM questionnaire [5]. The questions had seven response alternatives ranging from (1) completely disagree to (7) completely agree. The questions were then categorized (sometimes in reverse order in accordance with the instrument key) into the FFM traits (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Agreeableness and Conscientiousness). In the present study, the mean Cronbach Alfa for the SGC1 was 0.72 (n = 0.81; E 0.77; O 0.58; A 0.62; C 0.80).

Age and gender data were collected from the questionnaire.

Sleep disturbances were dealt with by the question: Do you regularly suffer from insomnia? The response alternatives were ‘Yes’ and ‘No’.

The question regarding the financial situation, i.e. whether the person had savings or a low economic status was: If necessary, could you raise the sum of 14,000 SEK (about 2000 USD) for unexpected expenses within one week? The response alternatives were ‘Yes’ and ‘No’. The question used in the SNAC database concerning the participants’ financial situation was based on a Swedish survey on income and living conditions [24].

Educational level was measured based on the question: Which educational level have you attained? to be answered by: Did you finish secondary school? The response alternatives were ‘Yes’ and ‘No’.

2.4 Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to investigate the distribution of the included variables. The tests were based on gender. A backward multivariate logistic regression was performed to find out whether or not personality traits were related to pain. This was followed by a forward multivariate logistic regression to obtain odds ratios (OR) in order to investigate whether personality traits are associated with pain among older adults, adjusted for age, insomnia, financial situation and education. Five steps were performed. In step one, odds ratio for personality trait (s) was calculated. Step two included age. Step three involved insomnia. Step four covered the financial situation and the final step comprised education. To evaluate the goodness of fit of the logistic regression model the Nagelkerke R square coefficient was calculated. All analyses were carried out using the SPSS programme, version 17.0. Probability values (p-value) of less than 0.05 were considered significant. Missing data are denoted (n) in all analyses.

3 Results

Pain was reported by 769 (54.8%) individuals, 496 (64.5%) women and 273 (35.5%) men (p<0.001). Pain intensity was reported by 704 individuals, 443 (89.3%) women and 261 (95.6%) men and distributed as follows; women: mild 63 (14.2%); moderate 260 (58.7%); severe 120 (27.1%) and men: mild 55 (21.1%); moderate 141 (54.0%); severe 65 (24.9%).

Mean age in the group of women reporting pain was 76.6 years compared to the group of women with no pain who had a mean age of 79.2 years (p<0.003). Men reporting pain had a mean age of 74.7 years compared to 75.9 years for those without pain.

Insomnia was reported by 304 (39.9%) in the pain group and by 110 (21.5%) of those without pain (p < 0.001). Women with pain, 234/493 (47.5%), most commonly reported insomnia followed by women without pain, 71/248 (28.6%). Among men, the corresponding figures were 70/209 (26.0%) and 39/263 (14.8%).

Among women, N was associated with pain (OR 1.05, CI 1.03-1.08) (Table 1a). In men, both N (OR 1.03, CI 1.002-1.07) and O (OR 1.04, CI 1.005-1.08) were associated with pain (Table 1b). No relationship between personality traits and pain intensity was detected (n.s.).

Table 1a

Study of the relationship between pain and personality among adults 60–96 years from the SNAB-B study (n = 1402): logistic backward regression models illustrating the association between personality traits and pain in women (n = 696).

Trait Odds ratio p-Value 95% confidence interval
Neurotic 1.05 0.00 1.03–1.08
Extraversion 0.99 0.76 0.96–1.03
Openness 1.01 0.71 0.98–1.04
Agreeableness 1.01 0.53 0.98–1.04
Consciousness 1.00 0.96 0.97–1.03
Constant 0.23 0.92
  1. Nagelkerke R square 0.042.

  2. SNAC-B, Swedish National Study on Aging and Care – Blekinge.

Table 1b

Study of the relationship between pain and personality among adults 60–96 years from the SNAB-B study (n = 1402): logistic backward regression models illustrating the association between personality traits and pain in men (n = 522).

Trait Odds ratio p-Value 95% confidence interval
Neurotic 1.03 0.04 1.002–1.07
Extraversion 0.97 0.10 0.94–1.005
Openness 1.04 0.02 1.005–1.08
Agreeableness 1.00 0.87 0.96–1.04
Consciousness 1.02 0.34 0.98–1.05
Constant 0.18 0.17
  1. Nagelkerke R square 0.027.

  2. SNAC-B, Swedish National Study on Aging and Care – Blekinge.

Significantly related personality traits were then tested based on gender by means of multivariate forward logistic regression in models adjusted for age, insomnia, financial status and educational level (Tables 2a and 2b).

Table 2a

Study of the relationship between pain and personality among adults 60–96 years from the SNAC-B study, (n = 1402): logistic forward regression models illustrating the association between independent variables and personality in women (n = 643).

Control variables Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Model 4
Model 5
Adjusted odds ratio 95% confidence interval Adjusted odds ratio 95% confidence interval Adjusted odds ratio 95% confidence interval Adjusted odds ratio 95% confidence interval Adjusted odds ratio 95% confidence interval
Neuroticism 1.06 1.03–1.09 1.06 1.04–1.09 1.05 1.03–1.08 1.05 1.03–1.08 1.05 1.02–1.08
Age (younger) 1.02 1.00–1.03 1.02 1.001–1.04 1.02 1.001–1.04 1.02 1.005–1.04
Insomnia 2.18 1.52–3.12 2.17 1.51–3.12 2.19 1.52–3.15
Low economic status 1.14 0.74–1.74 1.09 0.71–1.68
Low educational level 1.59 1.07–2.36
  1. Nagelkerke R square 0.10.

  2. SNAC-B, Swedish National Study on Aging and Care – Blekinge.

Table 2b

Study of the relationship between pain and personality among adults 60–96 years from the SNAC-B study, (n = 1402): logistic forward regression models illustrating the association between independent variables and personality in men (n = 490).

Control variables Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Model 4
Model 5
Adjusted odds ratio 95% confidence interval Adjusted odds ratio 95% confidence interval Adjusted odds ratio 95% confidence interval Adjusted odds ratio 95% confidence interval Adjusted odds ratio 95% confidence interval
Neuroticism 1.04 1.01–1.06 1.04 1.01–1.06 1.03 1.002–1.06 1.03 1.001–1.06 1.03 1.002–1.06
Openness 1.04 1.001–1.07 1.04 1.001–1.07 1.03 1.001–1.07 1.03 1.001–1.07 1.03 1.001–1.07
Age (younger) 1.00 0.98–1.02 1.00 0.98–1.02 1.00 0.98–1.02 1.00 0.98–1.02
Insomnia 1.99 1.25–3.16 2.00 1.26–3.18 1.98 1.24–3.15
Low economic status 1.17 0.68–2.03 1.17 0.68–2.03
Low educational level 1.31 0.84–2.04
  1. Nagelkerke R square 0.05.

  2. SNAC-B, Swedish National Study on Aging and Care – Blekinge.

In model 1, the strength of association between pain and the traits was about the same for women and men. In women, the trait N was associated with pain (OR 1.06, CI 1.03–1.09). In men, both the trait N (OR 1.04, CI 1.01–1.06) and O (OR 1.04, CI 1.001–1.07) were associated with pain.

In model 2, no association with younger age was found for either men or women.

In model 3, the OR for N remained weak but significant for both sexes. In women, insomnia had the highest odds ratio for pain (OR 2.18, CI 1.52–3.12) followed by N (OR 1.05, CI 1.03–1.08) and younger age (OR 1.02, CI 1.001–1.04). In men, the OR for insomnia was (OR 1.99, CI 1.25–3.16) followed N (OR1.03, CI 1.002–1.06) and O (OR 1.03, CI 1.001–1.07).

In model 4, no association with low economic status was found for either men or women and no changes in relationship between pain and personality traits, age or insomnia was noted.

In model 5, in the final model for women, insomnia still yielded the highest odds ratio for pain (OR 2.19, CI 1.52–3.15) followed by low educational level (OR 1,59 CI 1.07–2.36). The trait of N (OR 1.05, CI 1.02–1.08) and belonging to the younger group of older adults (OR 1.02, CI 1.005–1.04) remained stable. A strained financial situation was not significantly related to pain (Table 2a).

In the final model for men, insomnia was found to have the highest odds ratio for pain (OR 1.98, CI 1.24–3.15) followed by the traits of N (OR 1.03, CI 1.002–1.06) and O (OR1.03, CI1.001–1.07). Belonging to the younger group of older adults, having a strained financial situation and low educational level were not significantly related to pain. The relationship between personality traits and pain was only affected to a minor extent by insomnia (Table 2b).

4 Discussion

This study adds to knowledge of pain in the elderly population and suggests that older adults with pain may share particular personality traits. The relationship between pain and personality seems to be equally strong among both sexes, although different traits are present in women and men. The result indicates about the same strength of association between pain and the trait of N in women and between pain and the traits of N and O among men. However, the OR values regarding personality traits are statistically significant but generally very low in the older population compared with younger pain patients [7, 8]. Therefore, interpretation of the results should be made with care. It is important to bear in mind that a personality trait is a multi-dimensional construct and although attempts have been made to classify human beings into stereotypical categories, “The Big Five” traits only reveal the dominant facet of an individual’s personality [5]. However, this population-based study highlights that personality traits were significant although marginally related to pain both in the female and the male group. Could it be that our findings can be explained by the ageing process? Nevertheless, a small but significant relationship to traits may help to predict different aspects of pain among older adults.

Some limitations should be mentioned. Fishbain et al. pointed out that certain trait tests and inventories may not be independent of pain state, as trait scores can change in line with pain treatment [31]. Despite the fact that adherence rates, such as adherence to medication, in women and men are very similar, some differences exist and women are slightly less adherent in following specific recommendations [32]. In this cross-sectional study it was not possible to predict changes in trait scores as a result of treatment. Another limitation is that the subjective experience of pain was self-reported and restricted to the four preceding weeks. The results do not reveal whether the reported pain was persistent or acute. However, the strength with the question is that it was used in other European studies of older adults [33]. The size of the sample can be discussed, but the strength of this population- based randomized study lies in the proportion of older people in the oldest old groups. As a goodness of fit of the models used, the Nagelkerke value was used. Nagelkerke value is higher, (10%), among women compared to men (5%). Even though R-squared is small it has information value. Since personality traits could be considered as a weak signal in the presence of a lot of other factors influencing the experience of pain even a weak signal could be informative. Since neuroticism is so clearly associated with other factors related to pain and the relationship is stronger among younger adults these results will raise two questions: (1) Do older people suffer from a different type of pain than younger adults? (2) Is more state like measures, i.e. pain catastrophizing stronger associated with personality traits among older adults?

Pain is common among older people and the majority suffers from insomnia [22, 26]. The gender-based differences in the elderly population are reinforced among those with pain [34, 35]. The youngest women in this study had marginally higher odds values for pain, which difference was statistically significant. This is in line with a previous study of QoL among older adults living with pain [33], but contrasts with findings by Rustøen et al. who compared older with middle-aged adults [34]. Our results demonstrate that insomnia has the strongest association with pain and the highest odds ratio. Traits were only marginally decreasing when adjusted for insomnia. Van de Laar et al. discussed whether personality factors play a causal role in the development of insomnia as they found a common trend among insomniacs to exhibit the trait of neuroticism [28].

Neither financial status nor educational level was found to have any relationship with pain among men. Educational level seems to be related to pain among older women. This is in contrast with findings from the MultiCare Cohort Study of patients aged 65 years and older where pain-related morbidity was equally distributed across age and socio-economic groups [35]. More studies are needed to investigate whether or not personality traits influence the incidence of pain and recovery rate from pain. Another interesting question is whether or not personality is a contributory factor to morbidity/mortality among individuals living with pain. Despite the fact that personality seems fairly stable across the lifespan, there is a lack of studies focusing on personality and its association with pain among older adults. Assessment of personality traits may be clinically important and contribute to a deeper understanding of how to manage older adults suffering from pain, thus contributing to diversity in successful ageing/longevity. However, since the relationship with personality traits is much weaker among older than younger adults, further studies are needed regarding if state like measures as pain catastrophizing, could be stronger associated with personality traits.

5 Conclusions

Neuroticism has a relationship with pain among elderly women. Neuroticism and openness have a relationship with pain among elderly men. Insomnia is associated with pain among both women and men. Thus the main result is a gender difference: pain has a stable relationship with neuroticism in both sexes, but also a relation with the personality trait openness among older men.

6 Implications

There is a need to increase awareness of the impact of personality as well as to provide improved treatment for pain and insomnia in older people.

Highlights

  • Pain has a relationship with neuroticism among elderly women.

  • In men, both neuroticism and openness are associated with pain.

  • Both sexes suffer from insomnia.

  • There is gender difference in the relationship between personality traits and pain.


DOI of refers to article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2014.12.004.



Viktoriagatan 17, 371 37 Karlskrona, Sweden. Tel.: +46 708962509

  1. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest are declared.

Acknowledgements

The Swedish National Study on Aging and Care, SNAC (www.snac.org), is supported financially by the Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs and by the participating county councils, municipalities and university departments. We are grateful to the participants, counties and municipalities. The present study is supported by the Centre of Competence, County of Blekinge, and the Blekinge Research Council.

References

[1] Merskey H, Bogduk N. Classification of chronic pain, IASP task force on taxonomy. Part III: Pain terms, a current list with definitions and notes on usage. 2nd ed. Seattle: IASP Press; 1994. p. 209–14.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Terracciano A, Lockenhoff CE, Zonderman AB, Ferrucci L, Costa PT. Personality predictors of longevity: activity, emotional stability, and conscientiousness. Psychosom Med 2008;70:621–7.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Vassend O, Roysamb E, Nielsen CS. Five-factor personality traits and pain sensitivity: a twin study. Pain 2013;154:722–8.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Wade JB, Dougherty LM, Hart RP, Rafii A, Price DD. A canonical correlation-analysis of the neuroticism and extroversion on chronic pain, suffering, and pain behavior. Pain 1992;51:67–73.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Costa Jr PT, McCrae R. Stability and change in personality assessment: the revised NEO personality inventory in the year 2000. J Pers Assess 1997;68:86–94.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Smith TW, Williams PG. Personality and health: advantages and limitations of the five-factor model. J Pers 1992;60:395–423.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Grov EK, Fosså SD, Bremnes RM, Dahl O, Klepp O, Wist E, Dahl AA. The personality trait of neuroticism is strongly associated with long-term morbidity in testicular cancer survivors. Acta Oncol 2009;48:842–9.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Martínez MP, Sánchez AI, Miró E, Medina A, Lami MJ. The relationship between the fear-avoidance model of pain and personality traits in fibromyalgia patients. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2011;18:380–91.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Masui Y, Gondo Y, Inagaki H, Hirose N. Do personality characteristics predict longevity? Findings from the Tokyo Centenarian Study. Age 2006;28: 353–61.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Shipley BA, Weiss A, Der G, Taylor MD, Deary IJ. Neuroticism, extraversion, and mortality in the UK Health and Lifestyle Survey: a 21-year prospective cohort study. Psychosom Med 2007;69:923–31.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Stephan Y. Openness to experience and active older adults’ life satisfaction: a trait and facet-level analysis. Pers Individ Diff 2009;47:637–41.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Jerant A, Chapman BP, Franks P. Personality and EQ-5D scores among individuals with chronic conditions. Qual Life Res 2008;17:1195–204.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Pearman A. Sadness prediction and response: effects of age and agreeableness. Aging Ment Health 2010;14:355–63.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Janowski K, Steuden S, Kurylowicz J. Factors accounting for psychosocial functioning in patients with low back pain. Eur Spine J 2010;19: 613–23.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Hill PL, Roberts BW, Patrick L. The role of adherence in the relationship between conscientiousness and perceived health. Health Psychol 2011;30:797–804.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Hill PL, Turiano NA, Hurd MD, Mroczek DK, Roberts BW. Conscientiousness and longevity: an examination of possible mediators. Health Psychol 2011;30:536–41.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Goubert L, Crombez G, Damme S. The role of neuroticism, pain catastrophizing and pain-related fear in vigilance to pain: a structural equations approach. Pain 2004;107:234–41.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Daubs MD, Norvell DC, McGuire R, Molinari R, Hermsmeyer JT, Fourney DR, Wolinsky JP, Brodke D. Fusion versus nonoperative care for chronic low back pain: do psychological factors affect outcomes? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:96–109.Search in Google Scholar

[19] McCrae RR, Costa Jr PT. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987;52:81–90.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Jaconelli A, Stephan Y, Canada B, Chapman BP. Personality and physical functioning among older adults: the moderating role of education. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2013;68:553–7.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Krueger K, Wilson R, Shah R, Tang Y, Bennett D. Personality and incident disability in older persons. Age Ageing 2006;35:428–33.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Lindström V, Andersson K, Lintrup M, Holst G, Berglund J. Prevalence of sleep problems and pain among the elderly in Sweden. J Nutr Health Aging 2012;16:180–3.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Komarraju M, Karau SJ, Schmeck RR, Avdic A. The big five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement. Pers Individ Diff 2011;51: 472–7.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Statistics Sweden (SCB). Living conditions. Ill health and care in the country [Ämnesområde: Levnadsförhållanden, tabell: Ohälsa och vård (ULF) I riket efter alder, kon och hälsoindikator]; 2004, År 1980–2003. Available at: http://www.ssd.scb.se/database [accessed 2.08.04].Search in Google Scholar

[25] Lee MH, Lee SA, Lee GH, Ryu HS, Chung S, Chung YS, Kim WS. Gender differences in the effect of comorbid insomnia symptom on depression, anxiety, fatigue, and daytime sleepiness in patients with obstructiv sleep apnea. Sleep Breath 2014;18:111–7.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Jaussent I, Dauvilliers Y, Ancelin ML, Dartigues JF, Tavernier B, Touchon J, Ritchie K, Besset A. Insomnia symptoms in older adults: associated factors and gender differences. Am J GeriatrPsychiatry2011;19:88–97.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Zimmerman ME, Bigal ME, Katz MJ, Derby CA, Lipton RB. Are sleep onset/maintenance difficulties associated with medical or psychiatric comorbidities in nondemented community-dwelling older adults? J Clin Sleep Med 2013;9:363–9.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Van de Laar M, Verbeek I, Pevernagie D, Aldenkamp A, Overeem S. The role of personality traits in insomnia. Sleep Med Rev 2010;14:61–8.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Lagergren M, Fratiglioni L, Rahm Hallberg I, Berglund J, Elmståhl S, Hagberg B, Holst G, Rennemark M, Sjölund BM, Thorslund M, Wiberg I, Winblad B, Wimo A. A longitudinal study integrating population, care and social services data. The Swedish National Study on Aging and Care (SNAC). Aging Clin Exp Res 2004;16:158–68.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Gallagher EJ, Bijur PE, Latimer C, Silver W. Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2002;20: 287–90.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Fishbain DA, Cole B, Cutler RB, Lewis J, Rosomoff HL, Rosomoff RS. Chronic pain and the measurement of personality: do states influence traits? Pain Med 2006;7:509–29.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Franks P, Chapman B, Duberstein P, Jerant A. Five factor model personality factors moderated the effects of an intervention to enhance chronic disease management self-efficacy. Br J Health Psychol 2009;14:473–87.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Thomas E, Peat G, Harris L, Wilkie R, Croft PR. The prevalence of pain and pain interference in a general population of older adults: cross-sectional findings from the North Staffordshire Osteoarthritis Project (NorStOP). Pain 2004;110:361–8.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Rustøen T, Wahl AK, Hanestad BR, Lerdal A, Paul S, Miaskowski C. Age and the experience of chronic pain: differences in health and quality of life among younger, middle-aged, and older adults. Clin J Pain 2005;21:513–23.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Schäfer I, Hansen H, Schön G, Höfels S, Altiner A, Dahlhaus A, Gensichen J, Riedel-Heller S, Weyerer S, Blank WA, König HH, von dem Knesebeck O, Wegscheider K, Scherer M, van den Bussche H, Wiese B. The influence of age, gender and socioeconomic status on multimorbidity patterns in primary care. First results from the multicare cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12:89.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-09-01
Revised: 2014-12-03
Accepted: 2014-12-05
Published Online: 2015-04-01
Published in Print: 2015-04-01

© 2014 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Editorial comment
  2. The importance of studying personality traits and pain in the oldest adults
  3. Clinical pain research
  4. The influence of personality traits on perception of pain in older adults – Findings from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care – Blekinge study
  5. Editorial comment
  6. Sinomenine is a promising analgesic and antihyperalgesic for pain and hypersensitivity in rheumatoid arthritis
  7. Original experimental
  8. Sinomenine alleviates mechanical hypersensitivity in mice with experimentally induced rheumatoid arthritis
  9. Editorial comment
  10. Oral immediate and prolonged release oxycodone for safe and effective patient controlled analgesia after surgery Can opioid for acute postoperative pain be improved by adding a peripheral opioid antagonist?
  11. Clinical pain research
  12. Oral oxycodone for pain after caesarean section: A randomized comparison with nurse-administered IV morphine in a pragmatic study
  13. Editorial comment
  14. Nitrous oxide in oxygen (50:50) is analgesic that requires optimal inhalation procedure
  15. Clinical pain research
  16. Nitrous oxide analgesia for bone marrow aspiration and biopsy – A randomized, controlled and patient blinded study
  17. Editorial comment
  18. Ketamine has anti-hyperalgesic effects and relieves acute pain, but does not prevent persistent postoperative pain (PPP)
  19. Systematic review
  20. Intra- and postoperative intravenous ketamine does not prevent chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
  21. Editorial comment
  22. Raising the standards of preclinical pain studies
  23. Topical review
  24. Experimental design and reporting standards for improving the internal validity of pre-clinical studies in the field of pain: Consensus of the IMI-Europain consortium
  25. Editorial Comment
  26. Single cases are complex Illustrated by Flink et al. ‘Happy despite pain: A pilot study of a positive psychology intervention for patients with chronic pain’
  27. Clinical pain research
  28. Happy despite pain: Pilot study of a positive psychology intervention for patients with chronic pain
Downloaded on 6.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1016/j.sjpain.2014.12.002/html
Scroll to top button