Home Invisible pain – Complications from too little or too much empathy among helpers of chronic pain patients
Article Publicly Available

Invisible pain – Complications from too little or too much empathy among helpers of chronic pain patients

  • Harald Breivik EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 1, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

In this issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Pain Tapio Ojala and co-workers publish a qualitative, phenomenological study focusing on health care providers’ difficulties in trying to understand chronic pain patients and communicate with them, and how failed communication negatively affects quality of life of the patients [1]. They demonstrate vividly how pain patients have negative experiences in their contacts with the health care system, how they are stigmatized in several ways, and how detrimental is the lack of empathy from those who are supposed to help. Their impression after in depth interviews of 34 patients with various causes of long term non-cancer pain, and formally analyzing the responses according to Giorgi’s four-phase phenomenological method, are that: Chronic pain patients without obvious anatomical explanation of their pain, experience disbelief and lack of trust from their health care providers (mostly physicians). The patients can experience that the helpers “do not understand how the patients are suffering”; they “do not know how to treat these pain conditions”. The patients get the impression that the helpers often say implicit that “the pain is only in your head”. The patients can feel that they are outright rejected by their doctors and other helpers in the social security system [1].

These are impressions of Tapio Ojala and coworkers after their interviews with 34 patients with more than 5 years chronic pain conditions (5 patients with low back pain, 10 with sciatica, 4 with complex regional pain syndromes, others with cervical disc herniation, cervical spinal stenosis, cervical spondylo-arthrosis/-arthritis, chronic neck pain, and fibromyalgia).

Too much empathy and suffering with our patients

The ability to experience empathy with our fellow human beings clearly varies from person to person [2]. A few have been equipped with too much empathy, and they, more often women than men, suffer too much with the patients who are experiencing intractable chronic pain. Failure to help chronic pain patients can cause “burn-out” among helpers. They may be unable to stay with this kind of work, unless their leaders, mentors, and the other members of the team are able to provide adequate support.

Even in the best of pain centers, not more than about 50% of patients with severe chronic pain will be helped to better quality of life [3]. Those who suffer too much with the intractable chronic pain patients, are prone to continue trying treatments that we know are less likely to help, sometimes ending up trying treatment approaches that we know have considerable risk of damaging the patients. Escalating doses of opioids in spite of little or no pain relief is a not uncommon result when the helper suffering with the patient is trying “everything” [4]. Invasive interventional techniques, e.g. intraforaminal epidural injections can cause paraplegia from spinal cord injury [5].

Too little empathy and failed communication with pain-patients

Too little empathy, while protecting the helper from “compassion-fatigue” [2] and burn-out, clearly can result in aggravated burden for many patients already suffering from difficult-to-treat or intractable chronic pain, as so clearly documented by Tapio Ojala and co-workers [1].

Finding the optimal attitude and professional approach when dealing with “difficult patients” is a responsibility of the leaders of our pain clinics and pain centers. This was the important message from Sir Michael Bond, former president of IASP, the International Association for the Study of Pain, when he lectured and wrote about this highly important and always present issue [6].


DOI of refers to article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2014.04.004



Tel.: +47 23073691; fax: +47 23073690

  1. Conflict of interest No conflict of interest declared.

References

[1] Ojala T, Häkkinen A, Karppinen J, Sipilä K, Suutama K, Piirainen A. Although unseen, chronic pain is real - a phenomenological study. Scand J Pain 2015;6:33–40.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Gleichgerrcht E, Decety J. The relationship between different facets of empathy, pain perception and compassion fatigue among physicians. Front Behav Neurosci 2014;8:243, http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00243 [Published online 11. 07. 14].Search in Google Scholar

[3] Heiskanen T, Roine RP, Kalso E. Multidisciplinary pain treatment - which patients do benefit? Scand J Pain 2013;4:201–7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2012.05.073.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Breivik H, Gordh T, Butler S. Keeping an open mind: achieving balance between too liberal and too restrictive prescription of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: using a two-edged sword. Scand J Pain 2012;3:1–4.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Hong JH, Kim SY, Huh B, Shin HH. Analysis of inadvertent intradiscal and intravascular injection during lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections. A prospective study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2013;38:520–5.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Bond MR, Simpson KH. Pain - its nature and treatment. With a foreword by Ronald Melzack. London: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2006.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-01-01
Published in Print: 2015-01-01

© 2014 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Scandinavian Journal of Pain
  2. Editorial comment
  3. Neuroinflammation and glial cell activation in pathogenesis of chronic pain
  4. Topical review
  5. Perspectives in Pain Research 2014: Neuroinflammation and glial cell activation: The cause of transition from acute to chronic pain?
  6. Editorial comment
  7. Outcome of spine surgery: In a clinical field with few randomized controlled studies, a national spine surgery register creates evidence for practice guidelines
  8. Observational study
  9. Results of lumbar spine surgery: A postal survey
  10. Editorial comment
  11. Partner validation in chronic pain couples
  12. Original experimental
  13. I see you’re in pain – The effects of partner validation on emotions in people with chronic pain
  14. Editorial comment
  15. Pain management with buprenorphine patches in elderly patients: Quality of life—As good as it gets?
  16. Clinical pain research
  17. Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of buprenorphine in treatment of chronic pain using competing EQ-5D weights
  18. Editorial comment
  19. Invisible pain – Complications from too little or too much empathy among helpers of chronic pain patients
  20. Observational study
  21. Although unseen, chronic pain is real–A phenomenological study
  22. Editorial comment
  23. Knee osteoarthritis patients with intact pain modulating systems may have low risk of persistent pain after knee joint replacement
  24. Clinical pain research
  25. The dynamics of the pain system is intact in patients with knee osteoarthritis: An exploratory experimental study
  26. Editorial comment
  27. Ultrasound-guided high concentration tetracaine peripheral nerve block: Effective and safe relief while awaiting more permanent intervention for tic douloureux
  28. Educational case report
  29. Real-time ultrasound-guided infraorbital nerve block to treat trigeminal neuralgia using a high concentration of tetracaine dissolved in bupivacaine
  30. Original experimental
  31. Modulation of the muscle and nerve compound muscle action potential by evoked pain
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1016/j.sjpain.2014.09.004/html
Scroll to top button