Home Medicine Pain management with buprenorphine patches in elderly patients: Quality of life—As good as it gets?
Article Publicly Available

Pain management with buprenorphine patches in elderly patients: Quality of life—As good as it gets?

  • Dagmar Westerling
Published/Copyright: January 1, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

In this issue of Scandinavian Journal of Pain, Norrlid and coworkers [1] report on pain management with buprenorpine patches in persistent, non-malignant pain in patients aged over 50 years. In their study, data on health related quality of life (HRQoL) from published studies [2,3,4,5] were analysed.

In their analysis, altogether 401 patients with moderate to severe pain from osteoarthrosis of the knee and hip, completed EQ-5D questionnaires before (baseline) and 3–6 months after titration with buprenorphine patches. In spite of the questionnaire’s apparent simplicity, EQ-5D allows for 243 different levels of HRQoL, from perfect health to death [1]. Following titration with buprenorphine patches, HRQoL improved, although a number of included patients, up to 30%, discontinued due to side effects.

The cost for a year of analgesic management with either buprenorphine patches in a dose of 10–15 μg/h and/or full dose of paracetamol/acetaminophen alone (up to 4g/day) was calculated. The cost of health care visits, extrapolated from three up to 12 visits per year, was added to the total cost of care.

Ideally, patients increase activity and thus quality of life, as a consequence of improved pain control. What is acceptable and clinically significant pain relief to a patient and thus improvement of HRQoL, on an individual basis and in a larger group of individuals? How much is this worth to the elderly patient suffering from moderate pain due to osteoarthritis and how much is it worth to society? Interview studies from the UK and from Sweden have arrived at different numbers [1]. Both Swedish and UK weights were used by Norrlid et al. [1] in order to compare the incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICER) of buprenorphine patches to pain management by paracetamol only.

Irrespective of which weights were used, analgesic management with buprenorphine patches was cost effective, but the Swedish weights produced a larger cost per Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) than the UK – weights did. The payer, in this case the National Board of Health and Welfare (NBHW) of Sweden, decides what is an acceptable upper limit for the cost of QALY, although there are not, as Norrlid et al. point out, general guidelines for the worth of QALY.

The recommended maximum dose of paracetamol or acetaminophen for elderly patients is given as 3 g/day [6]. However, paracetamol 4 g/day may be prescribed to, or used by, elderly patients, due to the difficulty to achieve a satisfactory pain control in this age group where the use of NonSteroidal Anti Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and/or potent opioids may be problematic due to contraindications, side effects or both [6].

The additional cost for antiemetics and laxatives were not regarded in the present analysis, although these adjuvants may be necessary to achieve an improvement of QoL, which thus would add to the estimated yearly cost of treatment. However, the cost for emergency calls due to unrelieved pain was not brought into the analysis either. The cost for healthcare of patients with unrelieved chronic pain is higher than for patients with no pain [7]. Moore et al. [7] argue in their systematic review that “effective pain management represents value for money”.

The authors should be commended for their effort to analyse already available data in order to gain new knowledge. Elderly individuals are increasing in society [8]. Pain is common in the elderly [6,8], more so in elderly in residential living, compared to elderly subjects living in their own homes. Elderly individuals, compared to younger subjects, have a greater incidence of conditions like cancer, diabetes, and musculoskeletal problems which are associated with pain [6].

An elderly patient with pain needs an individualised pain management plan where the clinician can make a choice of available therapies best suited to obtain pain relief. The clinician should make the choice of therapeutic intervention based on patient interview, careful clinical examination and pain analysis rather than on cost of QALY. However, the worth of QALY decides which therapies are available, to the patient and the clinician, since reimbursement of treatment is decided on the basis of cost effectiveness data, in Sweden by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Board (TLV). It is difficult to individualise pain management if only the cheapest pharmaceutical drugs are reimbursed and thus offered to the elderly patient by their physician.

It can be argued that we do not know if the improvement in QoL is sustained during long term treatment with buprenorphine. We do know that a large number of adult patients with chronic non-cancer pain discontinue opioids due to side effects, but also due to lack of analgesic effect [9].

However, in an elderly, frail patient with concomitant diseases, a reduced renal function and opioid sensitive pain, buprenorphine patches may be a good choice. Buprenorphine does not need to be dose adjusted in patients with reduced renal function and side effects may be manageable considering the fairly low dose, 5-20 μg/h [6,8]. In elderly frail patients the problem is not that there are an abundance of analgesic possibilities, rather the clinician is faced with just a few therapeutic options.

Davis [10] gave twelve reasons to consider buprenorphine as a frontline analgesic for pain management. Norrlid et al. [1] have now shown that well monitored analgesic management with buprenorphine patches is cost effective which adds another good reason to use buprenorphine patches for moderate to severe opioid sensitive pain in elderly patients.

Conclusion

Pain management should be individualised in order to obtain optimal pain control and a minimum of side effects. Non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments should be combined to obtain these results. The cost of the offered care is also important for the patient, the caregiver, and for society. Pain management with a significant analgesic effect that is possible to measure as a an improvement of quality of life is not only successful, but may also be cost effective for both the individual and for society. Norrlid et al. [1] have convincingly shown that in a larger group of patients over 50 years of age, treatment with buprenorphine patches is cost effective, compared with paracetamol full dose, for moderate to severe pain caused by osteoarthritis of the knee and hip.


DOI of refers to article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2014.07.002.


  1. Conflict of interest

    Dagmar Westerling has been consultant to the companies Almirall, Astellas, Grünenthal and Mundipharma.

References

[1] Norrlid H, Dahm P, RagnarsonTennvall G. Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of buprenorphine in treatment of chronic pain using competing EQ-5D weights. Scand J Pain 2015;6:24–30.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Karlsson M, Berggren AC. Efficacy and safety of low-dose transderma buprenorphine patches (5, 10 and 20μg/h) versus prolonged-release tramadol tablets (75, 100, 150, and 200 mg) in patients with chronic osteoarthritis pain: a 12-week, randomized, open-label, controlled, parallel-group noninferiority study. Clin Ther 2009;31:503–13.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Breivik H, Ljosaa TM, Stengaard-Pedersen K, Persson J, Aro H, Villumsen J, Tvinnemosef D. A 6-months, randomised, placebo-controlled evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of a low-dose 7-day buprenorphine transdermal patch in osteoarthritis patients naive to potent opioids. Scand J Pain 2010;1:122–41.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Conaghan PG, O’Brien CM, Wilson M, Schofield JP. Transdermal buprenorphine plus oral paracetamol vs an oral codeine-paracetamol combination for osteoarthritis of hip and/or knee; a randomised trial. Osteoarthr Cartil 2011;19:930–8.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Karlsson J, Söderström A, Augustini BG, Berggren AC. Is buprenorphine transdermal patch equally safe and effective in younger and elderly patients with osteoarthritis-related pain? Results of an age-group controlled study. Curr Med Res Opin 2014;30:575–87.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Abdulla A, Adams N, Bone M, Elliott AM, Gaffin J, Jones D, Knaggs R, Martin D, Sampson L, Schofield P, British Geriatric Society. Guidance on the management of pain in older people. Age Ageing 2013;42:i1–57.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Moore RA, Derry S, Taylor RS, Straube S, Phillips CJ. The costs and consequences of adequately managed chronic non-cancer pain and chronic neuropathic pain. Pain Pract 2014;14:79–94.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Kress H-G, Ahlbeck K, Aldington D, Alon E, Coaccioli S, Coluzzi F, Huygen F, Jaksch W, Kalso E, Kocot-Kepska M, Mangas AC, Margarit Ferri C, Morlion B, Müller-Schwefe G, Nicolaou A, Pérez Hernández C, Pergolizzi J, Schäfer M, Sichère P. Managing chronic pain in elderly patients requires a change of approach. Curr Med Res Opin 2014;30:1153–64.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Noble M, Treadwell JR, Tregar SJ, Coates VH, Wiffen PJ, Akafomo C, Schoelles KM. Long-term opioid management for chronic noncancerpain. Cochrane Libr 2010, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006605.pub2.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Davis MP. Twelve reasons for considering buprenorphine as a frontline analgesic in the management of pain. J Support Oncol 2012;10:209–19.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-01-01
Published in Print: 2015-01-01

© 2015 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Scandinavian Journal of Pain
  2. Editorial comment
  3. Neuroinflammation and glial cell activation in pathogenesis of chronic pain
  4. Topical review
  5. Perspectives in Pain Research 2014: Neuroinflammation and glial cell activation: The cause of transition from acute to chronic pain?
  6. Editorial comment
  7. Outcome of spine surgery: In a clinical field with few randomized controlled studies, a national spine surgery register creates evidence for practice guidelines
  8. Observational study
  9. Results of lumbar spine surgery: A postal survey
  10. Editorial comment
  11. Partner validation in chronic pain couples
  12. Original experimental
  13. I see you’re in pain – The effects of partner validation on emotions in people with chronic pain
  14. Editorial comment
  15. Pain management with buprenorphine patches in elderly patients: Quality of life—As good as it gets?
  16. Clinical pain research
  17. Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of buprenorphine in treatment of chronic pain using competing EQ-5D weights
  18. Editorial comment
  19. Invisible pain – Complications from too little or too much empathy among helpers of chronic pain patients
  20. Observational study
  21. Although unseen, chronic pain is real–A phenomenological study
  22. Editorial comment
  23. Knee osteoarthritis patients with intact pain modulating systems may have low risk of persistent pain after knee joint replacement
  24. Clinical pain research
  25. The dynamics of the pain system is intact in patients with knee osteoarthritis: An exploratory experimental study
  26. Editorial comment
  27. Ultrasound-guided high concentration tetracaine peripheral nerve block: Effective and safe relief while awaiting more permanent intervention for tic douloureux
  28. Educational case report
  29. Real-time ultrasound-guided infraorbital nerve block to treat trigeminal neuralgia using a high concentration of tetracaine dissolved in bupivacaine
  30. Original experimental
  31. Modulation of the muscle and nerve compound muscle action potential by evoked pain
Downloaded on 29.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1016/j.sjpain.2014.09.003/html
Scroll to top button