Home Quality of life in low back pain patients with MRI-lesions in spinal bone marrow and vertebral endplates (Modic-changes): Clinical significance for outcome of spinal surgery?
Article Publicly Available

Quality of life in low back pain patients with MRI-lesions in spinal bone marrow and vertebral endplates (Modic-changes): Clinical significance for outcome of spinal surgery?

  • Tue Secher Jensen EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 1, 2014
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

In this issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Pain, Juhani Määtä and his coworkers report results from a study of 181 patients with low back pain (LBP) with or without sciatica referred to spinal surgery [1]. The aim of the study was to examine the association between Modic changes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) an issue that has not been addressed on its own in patients referred to lumbar spine surgery.

1 What are Modic changes?

Modic changes are seen in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as changes in the vertebral endplate and subchondral bone marrow in the spine [2,3]. Modic changes type I are thought to represent an active, edematous/inflammatory and painful phase as compared to type II that is believed to represent a more stable and nonpainful state [4,5,6]. Recent studies suggest that Modic changes, especially type I changes, may have therapeutic and prognostic value in patients with persistent LBP [7,8,9].

2 Modic changes in LBP

Previous research in Modic changes has primarily focused on the biological part of the bio-psycho-social model of LBP and very few studies (if any) have focused on the association between Modic changes and health-related quality of life which makes the study by Määtä et al. a worthwhile and interesting study with a novel approach.

In the search for clinically relevant subgroups among the large group of patients with non-specific LBP, Modic changes have come in focus as studies have shown that these changes are highly prevalent among adult patients with LBP as compared to LBP free individuals. Also, Modic changes are associated with LBP in study populations from the general, working and clinical study populations as reported in a systematic review by Jensen et al. [10].

The clinical assumption, that the two types of Modic changes are clinically different, was used in the study by Määtä et al. where patients were classified according to the presence of “Type I” or “Type II” of Modic changes. Patients with Modic type I changes were classified as ‘Type I’ and those with Modic changes other than type I were classified as “Type II”. For evaluation of health-related quality of life, the authors used the RAND-36 (SF-36) which is the most commonly used instrument for measuring health-related quality of life in patient with chronic LBP [11].

3 Main findings of Määtä et al. [1] and why they are important

The study showed that Modic changes are common (46%) in patients referred to spinal surgery. This prevalence is very close to the median prevalence of 43% in LBP care seeking populations [10].

The most interesting finding of the study was that Modic changes ‘Type II’ were found to be positively associated with three of the four mental sub-scales of the SF-36 indicating a poorer mental status of HRQoL for patients in this group even after adjusting for age and sex. However, when adjusting also for duration of LBP and the ‘degeneration sum score’, only one mental sub-scale, the emotional functioning-scale, remained statistically significantly associated with Modic changes ‘Type II’.

As the authors themselves suggest, these results indicate that Modic changes type II themselves may not have a direct influence on HRQoL but that it is likely that they are a proxy for advanced degeneration of the spine and longer duration of pain. If Modic changes are indeed associated with poor mental health it is important that this is taken into account in the management of this type of patient as this is likely to have relevance in relation to the patients’ prognosis. Thus, it is well known that patients with depression have smaller improvements in HRQoL and disability after spinal surgery [14].

It is well known that LBP is considered a multi-factorial disorder and this study is a very good example of this complexity. Modic changes, disc degeneration, long duration of pain, and HRQoL are all factors that are associated with the presence of chronic LBP [9,12,13]. The results from the Määtä et al. study therefore support the importance of these factors in understanding their relationship to patients with LBP referred to surgery.

When investigating a multi-factorial disorder, such as nonspecific LBP, it is important to include a sufficient number of study participants to be able to control for variables from all of the three overall model domains in the bio-psycho-social model. In the present study it was not possible to make more detailed sub-analyses which may have given more clear answers to the questions asked. However, the study [1] highlights the importance of a broader view on non-specific LBP as a multi-factorial disorder in both clinical practice and research.

4 Conclusion and implications

The results from this study suggest that it is worth noticing whether or not a patient referred for spinal surgery has Modic changes on MRI as the presence of Modic type II could be a marker for identifying patients who have poor mental health. Poor mental health also needs to be addressed in the management of these patients. However, the most important implication of this study is the emphasis on non-specific LBP being a multi-factorial disorder when dealt with in both research and clinical practice.


DOI of refers to article:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2013.08.003.



Rygcenter Syddanmark, Østre Hougvej 55,5500 Middelfart, Denmark. Tel.: +45 6348 4679; fax: +45 6348 4446

  1. Conflict of interest: The author has no conflict of interest related to this Editorial comment.

References

[1] Määttä J, Kautiainen H, Leinonen V, Niinimäki J, Järvenpää S, Koskelainen T, Mäkelä P, Pesälä J, Nyyssönen T, Savolainen S, Airaksinen O, Kyllönen E, Cheung KMC, Karppinen J. Association of Modic changes with health-related quality of life among patients referred to spine surgery. Scand J Pain 2014;5: 36–40.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Modic MT, Steinberg PM, Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Carter JR. Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology 1988;166:193–9.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Modic MT, Masaryk TJ, Ross JS. Imaging of degenerative diskdisease. Radiology 1988;168:177–86.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Albert HB, Kjaer P, Jensen TS, Sorensen JS, Bendix T, Manniche C. Modicchanges, possible causes and relation to low back pain. Med Hypotheses 2008;70: 361–8.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Kuisma M, Karppinen J, Niinimaki J, Ojala R, Haapea M, Heliovaara M, Korpelainen R, Taimela S, Natri A, Tervonen O. Modic changes in end-plates of lumbar vertebral bodies: prevalence and association with low back and sciatic pain among middle-aged male workers. Spine 2007;32: 1116–22.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Toyone T, Takahashi K, Kitahara H, Yamagata M, Murakami M, Moriya H. Vertebral bone-marrow changes in degenerative lumbar disc disease. An MRI study of 74 patients with low back pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994;76:757–64.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Albert HB, Sorensen JS, Christensen BS, Manniche C. Antibiotic treatment in patients with chronic low back pain and vertebral bone edema (Modic type 1 changes): a double-blind randomized clinical controlled trial of efficacy. Eur Spine J 2013;22:697–707.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Cao P, Jiang L, Zhuang C, Yang Y, Zhang Z, Chen W, Zheng T. Intradiscal injection therapy for degenerative chonic discogenic low back pain with end plate Modic changes. Spine J 2011;11:100–6.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Jensen RK, Leboeuf-Yde C, Wedderkopp N, Sorensen JS, Jensen TS, Manniche C. Is the development of Modic changes associated with clinical symptoms? A 14months cohort study with MRI. EurSpine J 2012;21:2271–9.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Jensen TS, Karppinen J, Sorensen JS, Niinimaki J, Leboeuf-Yde C. Vertebral endplate signal changes (Modic change): a systematic literature review of prevalence and association with non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J 2008;17:1407–22.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Chapman JR, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT, Bransford RJ, DeVine J, McGirt MJ, Lee MJ. Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:S54–68.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Cheung KM, Karppinen J, Chan D, Ho DW, Song YQ, Sham P, Cheah KS, Leong JC, Luk KD. Prevalence and pattern of lumbar magnetic resonance imaging changes in a population study of one thousand forty-three individuals. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:934–40.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Nakamura M, Nishiwaki Y, Ushida T, Toyama Y. Prevalence and characteristics of chronic musculoskeletal pain in Japan. J Orthop Sci 2011;16: 424–32.Search in Google Scholar

[14] den Boer JJ, Oostendorp RA, Beems T, Munneke M, Oerlemans M, Eve AW. A systematic review of bio-psychosocial risk factors for an unfavourable outcome after lumbar disc surgery. Eur Spine J 2006;15:527–36.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-01-01
Published in Print: 2014-01-01

© 2013 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Scandinavian Journal of Pain
  2. Editorial comment
  3. High risk of depression and suicide attempt among chronic pain patients: Always explore catastrophizing and suicide thoughts when evaluating chronic pain patients
  4. Clinical pain research
  5. Suicide attempts in chronic pain patients. A register-based study
  6. Editorial comment
  7. Polymorphism in the μ-opioid receptor gene OPRM1 A118G —An example of the enigma of genetic variability behind chronic pain syndromes
  8. Original experimental
  9. A118G polymorphism in the μ-opioid receptor gene and levels of β-endorphin are associated with provoked vestibulodynia and pressure pain sensitivity
  10. Editorial comment
  11. Genital pain related to sexual activity in young women: A large group who suffer in silence
  12. Original experimental
  13. Living with genital pain: Sexual function, satisfaction, and help-seeking among women living in Sweden
  14. Editorial comment
  15. The Norwegian version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI) is reliable and sensitive to changes in pain-intensity and consequences of pain-in-the-neck
  16. Clinical pain research
  17. Reliability and responsiveness of the Norwegian version of the Neck Disability Index
  18. Editorial comment
  19. Quality of life in low back pain patients with MRI-lesions in spinal bone marrow and vertebral endplates (Modic-changes): Clinical significance for outcome of spinal surgery?
  20. Clinical pain research
  21. Association of Modic changes with health-related quality of life among patients referred to spine surgery
  22. Editorial comment
  23. Warming and alkalinisation of lidocaine with epinephrine mixture: Some useful aspects at first glance, but not so simple?
  24. Clinical pain research
  25. Warmed and buffered lidocaine for pain relief during bone marrow aspiration and biopsy. A randomized and controlled trial
  26. Acknowledgement of Reviewers
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1016/j.sjpain.2013.11.003/html
Scroll to top button