Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Conflict Fragmentation Index

  • EMAIL logo und
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 29. September 2017
Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy
Aus der Zeitschrift Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy Band 23 Heft 4

Abstract

It is widely accepted that fragmentation influences conflict processes in a profound way. Multi-party conflicts with several fronts are notoriously hard to resolve. However, there is no easily computable measure to approximate conflict fragmentation. In this article, we introduce the conflict fragmentation index (CFI), which is computed by adapting the Herfindahl–Hirschman index. The CFI considers the relative prominence of each dyadic-level conflict-fronts nested in the entire civil war. The relative prominence is approximated by using available information on conflict casualties. The CFI is time-variant and highly sensitive to battlefield dynamics. The flexibility of CFI can bring several advantages. Most notably, it is possible to calculate monthly or even daily measures of conflict fragmentation by taking state-based (government vs. NSA) as well as non-state based (NSA vs. NSA) conflicts into account. Overall, the CFI provides a theoretically-informed and easy to compute measure to approximate conflict fragmentation.

Keywords: civil war; fragmentation; splintering; conflict duration

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council (grant number 1511566).

References

Allansson, M., Melander, E. & Themnér, L. (2017). Organized violence, 1989–2016. Journal of Peace Research, 4(54), 574–587.10.1177/0022343317718773Suche in Google Scholar

Ari, B (2017). Peace negotiations in civil conflicts (1975 – 2013): A new dataset. Colchester: University of Essex.Suche in Google Scholar

Bakke, K. M., Cunningham, K. G. & Seymour, L. J. M. (2012). A plague of initials: Fragmentation, cohesion, and infighting in civil wars. Perspectives on Politics, 10(2), 265–283.10.1017/S1537592712000667Suche in Google Scholar

Buhaug, H., Gates, S. & Lujala, P. (2009). Geography, rebel capability, and the duration of civil conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(4), 544–556.10.1177/0022002709336457Suche in Google Scholar

Butcher, C. (2015). ‘Capital punishment’: Bargaining and the geography of civil war. Journal of Peace Research, 52(2), 171–186.10.1177/0022343314552717Suche in Google Scholar

Croicu, M. & Sundberg, R. (2017). UCDP GED codebook version 17.1. Uppsala: Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University.Suche in Google Scholar

Cunningham, D. E. (2006). Veto players and civil war duration. American Journal of Political Science, 50(4), 875–892.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00221.xSuche in Google Scholar

Cunningham, K. G. (2013). Actor fragmentation and civil war bargaining: How internal divisions generate civil conflict. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 659–672.10.1111/ajps.12003Suche in Google Scholar

Cunningham, D. E., Gleditsch, K. S. & Salehyan, I. (2009). It takes two: A dyadic analysis of civil war duration and outcome. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(4), 570–597.10.1177/0022002709336458Suche in Google Scholar

Cunningham, K. G., Bakke, K. M. & Seymour, L. J. M. (2012). Shirts today, skins tomorrow: Dual contests and the effects of fragmentation in self-determination disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(1), 67–93.10.1177/0022002711429697Suche in Google Scholar

DeRouen, K., Bercovitch, J. & Pospieszna, P. (2011). Introducing the civil wars mediation (CWM) dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 48(5), 663–672.10.1177/0022343311406157Suche in Google Scholar

Findley, M. & Rudloff, P. (2012). Combatant fragmentation and the dynamics of civil wars. British Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 879–901.10.1017/S0007123412000099Suche in Google Scholar

Gleditsch, K. S. (2002). Expanded trade and GDP data. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(5), 712–724.10.1177/0022002702046005006Suche in Google Scholar

Hultman, L., Kathman, J. & Shannon, M. (2014). Beyond keeping peace: United Nations effectiveness in the midst of fighting. American Political Science Review, 108(4), 737–753.10.1017/S0003055414000446Suche in Google Scholar

Kreutz, J. (2010). How and when armed conflicts end: Introducing the UCDP conflict termination dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 47(2), 243–250.10.1177/0022343309353108Suche in Google Scholar

Pearlman, W. & Cunningham, K. G. (2012). Nonstate actors, fragmentation, and conflict processes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(1), 3–15.10.1177/0022002711429669Suche in Google Scholar

Rudloff, P. & Findley, M. G. (2016). The downstream effects of combatant fragmentation on civil war recurrence. Journal of Peace Research, 53(1), 19–32.10.1177/0022343315617067Suche in Google Scholar

Ruggeri, A., Gizelis, T.-I. & Dorussen, H. (2012). Managing mistrust: An analysis of cooperation with UN peacekeeping in Africa. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 57(3), 387–409.10.1177/0022002712448906Suche in Google Scholar

Seymour, L. J. M., Bakke, K. M. & Cunningham, K. G. (2016). E pluribus unum, ex uno plures: Competition, violence, and fragmentation in ethnopolitical movements. Journal of Peace Research, 53(1), 3–18.10.1177/0022343315605571Suche in Google Scholar

Thyne, C. (2015). The impact of coups d’etat on civil war duration. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 34(3), 287–307.10.1177/0738894215570431Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-9-29

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Introduction to the Proceedings of the 17th Jan Tinbergen European Peace Science Conference
  2. On the Proper Use of Game-Theoretic Models in Conflict Studies
  3. Ornithology and Varieties of Conflict: A Personal Retrospective on Conflict Forecasting
  4. Conflict Fragmentation Index
  5. Income and Armed Civil Conflict: An Instrumental Variables Approach
  6. Land-Use Change and Communal Conflicts in Sub-Saharan Africa
  7. Bridging Economics and International Relations to Understand State Capacity and War in Sub-Saharan Africa
  8. Political Regimes and Government’s Reaction to Terrorism. A Simple Model
  9. A Perfect Match? Are Dogmatic Belief Systems Simply a Reconciliation of Cognitive and Emotional Human Needs?
  10. Urban Protests, Coups d’état and Post-Coup Regime Change
  11. Nonviolent Resistance and Peaceful Turnover of Power
  12. Political Cycles in Military Deployment
  13. Buying Friends? The Importance of Economic Flows in Assembling the Iraq War Coalition
https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2017-0029
Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel
civil war; fragmentation; splintering; conflict duration

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Introduction to the Proceedings of the 17th Jan Tinbergen European Peace Science Conference
  2. On the Proper Use of Game-Theoretic Models in Conflict Studies
  3. Ornithology and Varieties of Conflict: A Personal Retrospective on Conflict Forecasting
  4. Conflict Fragmentation Index
  5. Income and Armed Civil Conflict: An Instrumental Variables Approach
  6. Land-Use Change and Communal Conflicts in Sub-Saharan Africa
  7. Bridging Economics and International Relations to Understand State Capacity and War in Sub-Saharan Africa
  8. Political Regimes and Government’s Reaction to Terrorism. A Simple Model
  9. A Perfect Match? Are Dogmatic Belief Systems Simply a Reconciliation of Cognitive and Emotional Human Needs?
  10. Urban Protests, Coups d’état and Post-Coup Regime Change
  11. Nonviolent Resistance and Peaceful Turnover of Power
  12. Political Cycles in Military Deployment
  13. Buying Friends? The Importance of Economic Flows in Assembling the Iraq War Coalition
Heruntergeladen am 29.4.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/peps-2017-0029/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen