Home Mithridates II and Antiochos Hierax
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Mithridates II and Antiochos Hierax

  • Žarko Petković
Published/Copyright: April 25, 2012
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The explanation of the Pontic policy of Mithridates II as offered in our scanty sources is hardly satisfactory. After the battle of Ankyra (240–239 BC), Mithridates’ position appeared ambiguous to modern and ancient authors alike (Section I–II). A revision of all the evidence would be welcome. If the chronology proposed here is correct (notably, it puts the date of the Pontic attack on Sinope at c. 228 BC instead of the widely accepted 220 BC), the aggressive policy of Mithridates in Asia Minor can be revised. The siege of Sinope should not be understood as an isolated episode in the endless Anatolian warfare; it was part of a premeditated policy which well accorded with the ambitious schemes of Antiochos Hierax (Section III). However, after Hierax’ defeat, Mithridates reverted to a policy of good relations with the main branch of the Syrian dynasty (Section IV).

Published Online: 2012-04-25
Published in Print: 2009-12

© by Akademie Verlag, Belgrad, Germany

Downloaded on 16.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1524/klio.2009.0019/html
Scroll to top button