Home Progress and Human Rights Justice as Evaluating Criteria for Global Developments
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Progress and Human Rights Justice as Evaluating Criteria for Global Developments

  • Georg Lohmann EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 27, 2020

Abstract

The paper clarifies first a critical understanding of “progress”. Progress implies a development for the better, the comprehensive definition of which must be a conception of justice if progress is to justify global developments and political rule. Therefore a somewhat minimal but complex definition of “human rights justice”, as formulated in the international human rights pacts since 1948, is explained. Through this, the different but systematically interrelated human rights (liberty rights, justice rights, political rights, economic, cultural and social rights) can allow for reflected and more comprehensive assessments of progress in different areas of development. But it is also necessary to integrate the specific progress developments into a comprehensive conception of human rights justice, the precise definition of which requires not only the observance of social but ultimately of all human rights, and in particular political participation rights. In the final section some problems of this approach will be discussed.

Published Online: 2020-05-27
Published in Print: 2020-05-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial Preface
  3. Vorwort des Herausgebers
  4. An Exercise in Global Philosophy
  5. I: Global Justice – 全球正义
  6. A Vindication of Distributive Justice
  7. Principles of Justice in a Changing World Order
  8. Global Justice: A Utopia and Concern of Humanitarianism
  9. On the Justifications of Contemporary Global Justice Theories
  10. Political Reconciliation in Light of Global Injustices
  11. The Interdependence of Domestic and Global Justice
  12. Kant on Structural Domination and Global Justice
  13. The Ethical Constraint on War
  14. II: Global Philosophy – 全球哲学
  15. Sheng-Sheng (生生) as Being-Between-Generations: On the Existential Structure of Confucian Ethics
  16. The Openness of Life-world and the Intercultural Polylogue
  17. How to Justify Principles of Justice
  18. Universalism vs. “All Under Heaven” (Tianxia / 天下) – Kant in China
  19. Three Types of Cosmopolitanism? Liberalism, Democracy, and Tian-xia
  20. III: Global Justice and Progress – 全球正义与进步
  21. Rethinking Progress Today
  22. Progress and Human Rights Justice as Evaluating Criteria for Global Developments
  23. Justice in Anthropocentrism. An Attitude Towards Contemporary Human Beings and Their Intellectual Crisis
  24. Towards a Transcultural Concept of Justice Based on Self-respect
  25. Justice as a Personal Virtue and Justice as an Institutional Virtue: Mencius’s Confucian Virtue Politics
  26. Moral Progress: Between Justification and Innovation
  27. Forms of Injustice and Regression
  28. Compulsive Growth and the Dynamics of “Perverted Progress”
  29. IV: Varia and Miscellaneous – 杂文拾萃
  30. Subjekt und Person: Zwei Selbst-Bilder des modernen Menschen in kulturübergreifender Perspektive
  31. Heideggerian Existence after Being and Time: In the Nameless ─ and a Brief Comparison of Namelessness and the Underlying Philosophy of Language between Heideggerian and Buddhist Perspectives
Downloaded on 10.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/yewph-2020-0018/html
Scroll to top button