Home Heideggerian Existence after Being and Time: In the Nameless ─ and a Brief Comparison of Namelessness and the Underlying Philosophy of Language between Heideggerian and Buddhist Perspectives
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Heideggerian Existence after Being and Time: In the Nameless ─ and a Brief Comparison of Namelessness and the Underlying Philosophy of Language between Heideggerian and Buddhist Perspectives

  • Leung Po-shan EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 27, 2020

Abstract

In this article, the importance of the namelessness of language will be firstly explained through an analysis of authenticity in Heideggerian philosophy, and will be further clarified by way of the phenomenon of “profound boredom” from his Freiburg lecture. As the exploration of namelessness in Heideggerian philosophy plays a crucial role in bridging the gap between East and West, a brief comparison concerning the idea of namelessness and its underlying philosophy of language between the Heideggerian and the madhyamaka Buddhist tradition will also be discussed.

Published Online: 2020-05-27
Published in Print: 2020-05-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial Preface
  3. Vorwort des Herausgebers
  4. An Exercise in Global Philosophy
  5. I: Global Justice – 全球正义
  6. A Vindication of Distributive Justice
  7. Principles of Justice in a Changing World Order
  8. Global Justice: A Utopia and Concern of Humanitarianism
  9. On the Justifications of Contemporary Global Justice Theories
  10. Political Reconciliation in Light of Global Injustices
  11. The Interdependence of Domestic and Global Justice
  12. Kant on Structural Domination and Global Justice
  13. The Ethical Constraint on War
  14. II: Global Philosophy – 全球哲学
  15. Sheng-Sheng (生生) as Being-Between-Generations: On the Existential Structure of Confucian Ethics
  16. The Openness of Life-world and the Intercultural Polylogue
  17. How to Justify Principles of Justice
  18. Universalism vs. “All Under Heaven” (Tianxia / 天下) – Kant in China
  19. Three Types of Cosmopolitanism? Liberalism, Democracy, and Tian-xia
  20. III: Global Justice and Progress – 全球正义与进步
  21. Rethinking Progress Today
  22. Progress and Human Rights Justice as Evaluating Criteria for Global Developments
  23. Justice in Anthropocentrism. An Attitude Towards Contemporary Human Beings and Their Intellectual Crisis
  24. Towards a Transcultural Concept of Justice Based on Self-respect
  25. Justice as a Personal Virtue and Justice as an Institutional Virtue: Mencius’s Confucian Virtue Politics
  26. Moral Progress: Between Justification and Innovation
  27. Forms of Injustice and Regression
  28. Compulsive Growth and the Dynamics of “Perverted Progress”
  29. IV: Varia and Miscellaneous – 杂文拾萃
  30. Subjekt und Person: Zwei Selbst-Bilder des modernen Menschen in kulturübergreifender Perspektive
  31. Heideggerian Existence after Being and Time: In the Nameless ─ and a Brief Comparison of Namelessness and the Underlying Philosophy of Language between Heideggerian and Buddhist Perspectives
Downloaded on 9.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/yewph-2020-0026/html
Scroll to top button