Home Masterpiece Theater Redux: “Chefs-d’œuvre photographiques du MoMA : la collection Thomas Walther”, Jeu de Paume, September 14, 2021 to February 13, 2022
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Masterpiece Theater Redux: “Chefs-d’œuvre photographiques du MoMA : la collection Thomas Walther”, Jeu de Paume, September 14, 2021 to February 13, 2022

  • Abigail Solomon-Godeau
Published/Copyright: July 7, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The recent exhibition at the Musée Jeu de Paume in Paris, entitled „Chefs-d’œuvre photographiques du MoMA: la collection Thomas Walther“, the first presented under the new directorship of Quentin Bajac, was well received. A closer examination of the exhibition and its premises, however, beginning with the title’s grandiose term “masterpieces”, raises a number of issues when a private collector’s sales to a major museum are presented in ways that occult the commercial underpinnings of the purchase and sale of private collections. We may also ask if a collector’s personal selection of photographs from a specific time period -- here, 1900 to 1940 – operates to replace history with connoisseurship. Last, such an exhibition seems to suggest a different direction for the museum which under the previous directorship of Marta Gili strove for gender equity in its exhibitions, and a distinctly ecumenical approach to the medium.

Abstract

Die kürzliche Ausstellung im Jeu de Paume in Paris mit dem Titel „Chefs-d’œuvre photographiques du MoMA: la collection Thomas Walther“, die erste unter der Leitung von Direktor Quentin Bajac, fand großen Anklang. Eine nähere Betrachtung von Schau und Standort, angefangen beim grandiosen Titelbegriff „Meisterwerke“, wirft jedoch eine Reihe von Fragen auf, wenn die Verkäufe eines Privatsammlers an ein bedeutendes Museum auf eine Art präsentiert werden, die die kommerzielle Grundlage des An- und Verkaufs von Privatsammlungen verschleiert. Wir können auch fragen, ob die persönliche Auswahl an Fotografien einer bestimmten Periode – hier von 1900 bis 1940 – durch einen Sammler dazu dienen soll, Geschichte durch Kennerschaft zu ersetzen. Schließlich scheint eine solche Schau auch eine neue Richtung des Museums anzudeuten, das unter der vorherigen Führung von Marta Gili in seinen Ausstellungen nach Gleichberechtigung der Geschlechter strebte und einen ausgeprägt umfassenden Ansatz verfolgte.

Anmerkungen

[1] Because of the Covid-19 pandemic, the long-planned colloquium had been postponed several times. Thus, when it was finally able tobe convened, the exhibition at the Jeu de Paume had already opened. The only, albeit distant, overlap between the colloquium and exhibition was the virtual contribution of Mitra Abbaspour, who during her previous tenure at New York’s Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) was involved in an ambitious multi-directional digitalization of the photographs MoMA had acquired from Walther. Her contribution was among a four-part, or rather, four-person presentation discussing ongoing digitalization projects within four institutions.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Quentin Bajac, Michel Frizot, Sarah Hermanson Meister: Chefs-d’œuvre photographiques du MoMA : la collection Thomas Walther / Photographic Masterpieces of MoMA. The Thomas Walther Collection, exh. cat. Jeu de Paume, Paris, September 14, 2021 – February 13, 2022, Paris: Les presses du réel 2021. The collector is tobe confused with the German Artur Walther, whose fortune was acquired during his years at Goldman Sachs and who, after his retirement, acquired a massive collection of German and subsequently, African photography, now housed in his private museum in Neu-Ulm (Burlafingen).Search in Google Scholar

[3] Officially, the Jeu de Paume is La Galerie nationale du Jeu de Paume, a non-profit association (L’association loi de 1901) supported by the French Ministry of Culture. From 2006 to 2018, between 60–70 % of its budget came from the Ministry and public resources; the remainder from its own resources (sponsorship, bookstore and ticketing). As opposed to this structure, the dodgy financing and tax arrangements of François Pinault’s contemporary museum at the Bourse de Commerce, for example, have been examined in Le Monde. See Jean-Michel Tobelem: “Collection Pinault : ‘Le choix d’une fondation aurait été plus en phase avec un projet muséal qui s’affiche comme généreux et désintéressé’ ”, in: Le Monde, June 24, 2021, https://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2021/06/24/collection-pinault-le-choix-d-une-fondationaurait-ete-plus-en-phase-avec-projet-museal-qui-s-affichecomme-genereux-et-desinteresse_6085569_3232.html (last accessed 15.03.2021).Search in Google Scholar

[4] Which ironically rhymes with Moholy-Nagy’s “Photography was invented a hundred years ago, but has only just been truly discovered,” – I quote from one of the exhibition’s wall labels.Search in Google Scholar

[5] One of the colloquium’s contributors, Isabella Seniuta, an assistant curator at the Centre Pompidou, made no mention of these connections in her paper on the role of the Zabriskie Gallery which had branches in Paris and New York and contributed to a heightened interest in surrealist photography in the 1970s and 1980s. (Rosalind Krauss, one of Virginia Zabriskie’s friends, who was a major force in its re-evaluation, possibly profited from Zabriskie’s photographic collection just as reciprocally, Zabriskie might have profited from Krauss’ research and scholarship.)Search in Google Scholar

[6] Uniquely among the visual arts, the medium is thought to produce singular (by which I mean individual) masterpieces, even anonymous ones.Search in Google Scholar

[7] See my essay “Calotypomania. The Gourmet Guide to Nineteenth-Century Photography”, in: Abigail Solomon-Godeau (ed.): Photography at the Dock. Essays on Photographic History, Institutions and Practices, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press 1991, pp. 4–27.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Correspondence with the MoMA, November 2021.Search in Google Scholar

[9] “Introduction”, in: Quentin Bajac, Michel Frizot, and Sarah Meister (ed.): Masterworks of Modern Photography 1900– 1940. The Thomas Walther Collection at The Museum of Modern Art, New York, exh. cat. Jeu de Paume, Paris, September 14, 2021 – February 13, 2022, Mailand: Silvana 2021.Search in Google Scholar

[10] For Artur Walther, in shopping expeditions for Chinese photography and videos, he had as his Cicerone the historian of photography Christopher Phillips; when his interests turned to African photography, he was accompanied in his travels by the late curator Okwui Enwezor.Search in Google Scholar

[11] I am assuming it is hardly necessary to reiterate Newhall’s role in the institutional shaping of photographic history, but Christopher Phillip’s now foundational essay on the subject is readily accessible. See Christopher Phillip: “The Judgement Seat of Photography”, in: Richard Bolton (ed.): The Contest of Meaning. Critical Histories of Photography, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1989, pp. 15–48.Search in Google Scholar

[12] After Chéroux’s departure from the Centre Pompidou, the museum hired Florian Ebner, then the photography curator at the Museum Folkwang, Essen, from 2012 to 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-07-07
Published in Print: 2022-04-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/rbf-2022-1006/html
Scroll to top button