Home A study on the effects of 532 nm continuous laser combined with photodynamic therapy versus 595 nm pulsed dye laser on a chicken comb model of vascular malformation
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A study on the effects of 532 nm continuous laser combined with photodynamic therapy versus 595 nm pulsed dye laser on a chicken comb model of vascular malformation

  • Ming-Lei Wei , Hai-Yan Zhang , Pei-Ru Wang , Bo Wang , Lei Shi , Guo-Long Zhang and Xiu-Li Wang EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 7, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Objective:

To explore the effects of 532 nm continuous laser combined with photodynamic therapy (PDT) versus 595 nm pulsed dye laser (PDL) on a chicken comb model of vascular malformation.

Study design:

Ninety adult male chickens were divided into three groups (A, B and C). One comb side of the chickens was taken randomly as the treatment side, and the other side as the self-control side. Group A was irradiated once with a 532 nm continuous laser after a single intravenous injection of hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether (HMME). In group B treatment side of combs was irradiated once with a 595 nm pulsed dye laser (PDL). In the control group C, the combs were treated neither with photosensitizer nor with irradiation.

Results:

Compared with the self-control sides, part of the treated combs were blanched after HMME-PDT while the histopathology showed an absence of erythrocytes and the vessel lumina were obliterated, leaving the normal overlying epidermis completely intact. At the same time selective destruction of the capillaries in the target area and obvious reduction of vascular vessel number were seen (p<0.01). In nine cases (30%) treatment was completely ineffective resulting in a total effective rate of 70% (21 cases). No scar formation was observed at all. After PDL treatment most of the treated combs were blanched while histopathology showed an absence of erythrocytes and the vessel lumina were obliterated, leaving the overlying epidermis with slight injuries and scabs. Here again, destruction of the capillaries in the target area and obvious reduction of vascular vessel number (p<0.01) were obtained. The total effective rate was 93% (28 cases); in two cases scars occurred. The combs of the control group showed no change compared with self-control sides (p>0.05).

Conclusion:

In the chicken comb model it was shown that both 532 nm HMME-PDT and 595 nm PDL treatment could damage capillaries in the superficial dermis of combs. The 532 nm HMME-PDT had fewer side effects compared with 595 nm PDL, but the inefficiency rate of 532 nm HMME-PDT group was higher than the 595 nm PDL group. No significant difference was observed in the macroscopic and histopathological results of both groups (p>0.05).

Zusammenfassung

Ziel:

Untersuchung der Effekte einer kombinierten 532 nm cw Laser-/Photodynamischen Therapie (PDT) im Vergleich zum Einsatz eines gepulsten 595 nm Farbstofflasers (PDL) am Hühnerkamm als Modell einer GefÀßmalformation.

Studiendesign:

Neunzig erwachsene mΓ€nnliche HΓΌhner wurden in drei Gruppen eingeteilt (A, B und C). Nach dem Zufallsprinzip wurde eine Kamm-Seite der HΓΌhner als Behandlungsseite, die andere als Selbstkontroll-Seite bestimmt. Gruppe A wurde nach intravenΓΆser Injektion von HΓ€matoporphyrin-Monomethylether (HMME) einmalig mit einem 532 nm cw Laser bestrahlt (HMME-PDT). In Gruppe B wurde die Behandlungsseite einmalig mit dem 595 nm PDL bestrahlt. In der Kontrollgruppe C erfolgte keinerlei Behandlung, weder mit einem Photosensibilisator noch durch Laserbestrahlung.

Ergebnisse:

Im Vergleich zu den Selbstkontroll-Seiten wiesen ein Teil der mit HMME-PDT behandelten KÀmme Ausbleichungen auf. In der Histopathologie konnte das Fehlen von Erythrozyten und die Obliteration von GefÀßlumina nachgewiesen werden, wÀhrend die darüberliegende Epidermis vollstÀndig intakt blieb. Gleichzeitig konnte die selektive Zerstârung der Kapillaren im Zielbereich und eine offensichtliche Reduktion der vaskulÀren GefÀßzahl beobachtet werden (p<0.01). In 9 FÀllen (30%) war die Behandlung wirkungslos, was einer effektiven Gesamtquote von 70% entspricht (21 FÀlle). Es wurde keinerlei Narbenbildung beobachtet. Nach der PDL-Behandlung wiesen die meisten der behandelten KÀmme Ausbleichungen auf. In der Histopathologie wurden das Fehlen von Erythrozyten und die Obliteration von GefÀßlumina festgestellt, wÀhrend die darüberliegende Epidermis leichte Verletzungen und Schorf aufwies. Auch hier war eine Zerstârung der Kapillaren im Zielbereich und eine offensichtliche Reduktion der vaskulÀren GefÀßzahl (p<0.01) zu beobachten. Ingesamt lag die EffektivitÀtsrate bei 93% (28 FÀlle); in zwei FÀllen traten Narben auf. Die KÀmme der Kontrollgruppe zeigten keine VerÀnderung im Vergleich zu den Selbstkontroll-Seiten (p>0.05).

Fazit:

Im HΓΌhnerkamm-Modell konnte gezeigt werden, dass sowohl mittels 532 nm HMME-PDT als auch 595 nm PDL-Behandlung die Kapillaren in der oberflΓ€chlichen Dermis geschΓ€digt werden kΓΆnnen. Die 532 nm HMME-PDT hatte im Vergleich zur 595 nm PDL-Behandlung weniger Nebenwirkungen, jedoch war die Ineffizienzrate hΓΆher. Es wurde kein signifikanter Unterschied in den makroskopischen und histologischen Ergebnissen zwischen den beiden Behandlungsgruppen beobachtet (p>0.05).

Award Identifier / Grant number: 81272990

Award Identifier / Grant number: 81472538

Award Identifier / Grant number: 8140120479

Funding statement: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant numbers: β€˜81272990’, β€˜81472538’, and β€˜8140120479’), Advanced Suitable Technology Popularization Project of Shanghai Health System (Grant number: β€˜2013SY007’), Basic Research Project of Science and Technology of Shanghai (Grant number: β€˜13JC1405101’), and the Joint Project of New Frontier Technology of Shanghai Shen-kang Hospital Development Center (Grant number: β€˜SHDC12015123’).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant numbers: β€˜81272990’, β€˜81472538’, and β€˜8140120479’), Advanced Suitable Technology Popularization Project of Shanghai Health System (Grant number: β€˜2013SY007’), Basic Research Project of Science and Technology of Shanghai (Grant number: β€˜13JC1405101’), and the Joint Project of New Frontier Technology of Shanghai Shen-kang Hospital Development Center (Grant number: β€˜SHDC12015123’).

  1. Conflict of interest statement: The authors state no conflict of interest. All authors have read the journal’s Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement available at the journal’s website and hereby confirm that they comply with all its parts applicable to the present scientific work.

References

[1] Frigerio A, Wright K, Wooderchak-Donahue W, Tan OT, Margraf R, Stevenson DA, Grimmer JF, Bayrak-Toydemir P. Genetic variants associated with port-wine stains. PLoS One 2015;10(7):e0133158.10.1371/journal.pone.0133158Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[2] Anolik R, Newlove T, Weiss ET, Brightman L, Hale EK, Karen JK, Bernstein L, Geronemus RG. Investigation into optimal treatment intervals of facial port-wine stains using the pulsed dye laser. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012;67(5):985–90.10.1016/j.jaad.2011.11.964Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Brightman LA, Geronemus RG, Reddy KK. Laser treatment of port-wine stains. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2015;8: 27–33.10.2147/CCID.S53118Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[4] Orenstein A, Nelson JS, Liaw LH, Kaplan R, Kimel S, Berns MW. Photochemotherapy of hypervascular dermal lesions: a possible alternative to photothermal therapy? Lasers Surg Med 1990;10(4):334–43.10.1002/lsm.1900100406Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Zhang FJ, Hu XM, Zhou Y, Li Q. Optimization of irradiance for photodynamic therapy of port-wine stain. J Biomed Opt 2015;20(4):048004.10.1117/1.JBO.20.4.048004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Gao K, Huang Z, Yuan KH, Zhang B, Hu ZQ. Side-by-side comparison of photodynamic therapy and pulsed-dye laser treatment of port-wine stain birthmarks. Br J Dermatol 2013;168(5):1040–6.10.1111/bjd.12130Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Pu Y, Chen W, Yu Z. Research progress of Hemoporfin – Part one: preclinical study. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2012;9(2):180–5.10.1016/j.pdpdt.2011.09.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Huang N, Zeng J, Liang J, Qiu H, Wang Y, Gu Y. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of oral oxycodone plus acetaminophen for the treatment of pain in photodynamic therapy on port wine stains. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2014;11(2):134–40.10.1016/j.pdpdt.2014.03.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Ohshiro T, Nakajima T, Ogata H, Kishi K. Histological responses of cutaneous vascular lesions following photodynamic therapy with talaporfin sodium: a chicken comb model. Keio J Med 2009;58(3):176–84.10.2302/kjm.58.176Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Li ZH, Meng DS, Li YY, Lu LC, Yu CP, Zhang Q, Guan HY, Li CW, Yang X, Fu RQ. Hypericin damages the ectatic capillaries in a Roman cockscomb model and inhibits the growth of human endothelial cells more potently than hematoporphyrin does through induction of apoptosis. Photochem Photobiol 2014;90(6):1368–75.10.1111/php.12323Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Ippolito C, Colucci R, Segnani C, Errede M, Girolamo F, Virgintino D, Dolfi A, Tirotta E, Buccianti P, Di Candio G, Campani D, Castagna M, Bassotti G, Villanacci V, Blandizzi C, Bernardini N. Fibrotic and vascular remodelling of colonic wall in patients with active ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis 2016. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw076.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Wang YZ, Huang Z, Yuan KH. The current situation and development in optical therapy for port-wine stains. J Pract Dermatol 2015;8(5):363–6.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Yuan KH, Yu WL, Li Q, editors. Laser cosmetic surgery. Beijing: People’s Military Medical Press; 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science 1983;220(4596):524–7.10.1126/science.6836297Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Zhang B, Zhang TH, Huang Z, Li Q, Yuan KH, Hu ZQ. Comparison of pulsed dye laser (PDL) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) for treatment of facial port-wine stain (PWS) birthmarks in pediatric patients. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2014;11(4):491–7.10.1016/j.pdpdt.2014.06.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Klapman MH, Sosa VB, Mattson-Gates GF, Baker CN, Ong VL, Yao JF. Patient perceptions of 595 nm pulsed dye laser through glass compression in the treatment of thick port wine stains and superficial venous malformations. Dermatol Online J 2008;14(8):1.10.5070/D38Z94K10BSearch in Google Scholar

[17] Yuan KH, Li Q, Yu WL, Zeng D, Zhang C, Huang Z. Comparison of photodynamic therapy and pulsed dye laser in patients with port wine stain birthmarks: a retrospective analysis. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2008;5(1):50–7.10.1016/j.pdpdt.2007.12.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-4-4
Revised: 2016-5-18
Accepted: 2016-6-2
Published Online: 2016-7-7
Published in Print: 2016-8-1

Β©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/plm-2016-0015/html
Scroll to top button