Timing of belief as a key to cross-linguistic variation in common ground management

References

Avis, Walter S. 1972. So eh? is Canadian, eh? Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 17. 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008413100007039.Search in Google Scholar

Barr, Dale J., Roger Levy, Christoph Scheepers & Harry J. Tily. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3). 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.Search in Google Scholar

Bartels, Christine. 1997. Towards a compositional interpretation of English statement and question intonation. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1997-833.Search in Google Scholar

Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Benjamin Bolker & Steven C. Walker. 2014. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1(7). 1–23.Search in Google Scholar

Bavelas, Janet Beavin, Peter De Jong, Harry Korman & Sarah Smock Jordan. 2012. Beyond back-channels: A three-step model of grounding in face-to-face dialogue. In Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Workshop on Feedback Behaviors in Dialogue 5–6. September 7–8, Stevenson, WA. Available at: http://www.cs.utep.edu/nigel/feedback/proceedings/full-proceedings.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Burton, Strang & Lisa Matthewson. 2015. Targeted construction storyboards in semantic fieldwork. Methodologies in Semantic Fieldwork. 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190212339.003.0006.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190212339.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Burton, Strang & Martina Wiltschko 2015. The geu vs. leicht problem. In: Short’schrift for Alan Prince. Compiled by Eric, Bakovic. https://princeshortschrift.wordpress.com/squibs/burton-wiltschko/.Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects and topics. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 25–55. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. & Susan E. Brennan. 1991. Grounding in communication. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition 13. 127–149.10.1037/10096-006Search in Google Scholar

Columbus, Georgie. 2010. “Ah lovely stuff, eh?”—invariant tag meanings and usage across three varieties of English. In Gries Stefan, Wulff Stefanie & Mark Davies (eds.), Corpus-linguistic applications, 85–102. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789042028012_007Search in Google Scholar

Farkas, Donca F. & Kim B. Bruce. 2010. On reacting to assertions and polar questions. Journal of Semantics 27(1). 81–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffp010.Search in Google Scholar

Groenendijk, Jeroen & Floris Roelofsen. 2009. Inquisitive semantics and pragmatics. Paper presented at the Stanford workshop on Language, Communication and Rational Agency, May 30-31, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Grosz, Barbara J. & Candace L. Sidner. 1986. Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12(3). 175–204.Search in Google Scholar

Golato, Andrea. 2010. Marking understanding versus receipting information in talk: Achso and ach in German interaction. Discourse Studies 12(2). 147–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609356497.Search in Google Scholar

Gunlogson, Christine. 2008. A question of commitment. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 22. 101–136. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.22.06gun.Search in Google Scholar

Heim, Johannes M. 2019a. Turn-peripheral management of Common Ground: A study of Swabian gell. Journal of Pragmatics 141. 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.007.Search in Google Scholar

Heim, Johannes. 2019b. Commitment and engagement: The role of intonation in deriving speech acts. PhD dissertation. Vancouver: UBC.Search in Google Scholar

Heim, Johannes, Hermann Keupdjio, Zoe Wai-Man Lam, Adriana Osa-Gómez, Sonja Thoma & Martina Wiltschko. 2016. Intonation and particles as speech act modifiers: A syntactic analysis. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 37. 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1515/scl-2016-0005.Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John. 1984. A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action (Studies in conversation analysis), 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.020Search in Google Scholar

Keupdjio, Hermann & Martina Wiltschko. 2018. Polar questions in Bamileke Medumba. Journal of West African Languages 45(2). 17–40.Search in Google Scholar

Lenth, Russell. 2018. Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.1.Search in Google Scholar

Malamud, Sofia A. & Tamina Stephenson. 2014. Three ways to avoid commitments: Declarative force modifiers in the conversational scoreboard. Journal of Semantics 32(2). 275–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffu002.Search in Google Scholar

Osa Gomez del Campo, Adriana. 2020. Epistemic (mis)alignment in discourse: What Spanish discourse markers reveal. Vancouver: PhD dissertation UBC.Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL https://www.R-project.org/.Search in Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert. 1978. Assertion. In Peter Cole (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 9: Pragmatics, 315–332. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368873_013Search in Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25(5). 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020867916902.10.1023/A:1020867916902Search in Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert. 2014. Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199645169.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina. 2014. The universal structure of categories: Toward a formal typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139833899.Search in Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina. 2017. Ergative constellations in the structure of speech acts. In Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa deMena Travis (eds.), The Oxford companion to ergativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.013.18.Search in Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina. 2019. Now can be the end of the past or the beginning of the future. In Lisa Matthewson, Erin Guntley, Marianne Huijsmanns & Michael Rochemont (eds.), “Wa7 xweysás i nqwal’úttensa i ucwalmícwa: He loves the people’s languages” Essays in Honour of Henry Davis, 385–400. UBC Working Papers in Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina. 2021. The grammar of interactional language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108693707Search in Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina & Johannes Heim. 2016. The syntax of confirmationals. In Günter Kaltenböck, Evelin. Keizer & Arne Lohrmann (eds.), Outside the clause: Form and function of extra-clausal constituents, 305–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.178.11wil.Search in Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina & Johannes Heim. 2020. Grounding beliefs: Structured variation in Canadian discourse particles. In Blasius Achiri-Taboh (ed.), Exoticism in English tag questions: Strengthening arguments and caressing the social wheel, 37–82. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Wolf, Lavi. 2014. Degrees of assertion. Be’er Scheva: Ben Gurion University of the Negev dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Merlin & Martina Wiltschko. 2016. The confirmational marker ha in Northern Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics 104. 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.004.Search in Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Malte. 2011. Discourse particles. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 33, 2011–2038. New York and Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar