The Thorn in Kant’s Side: J.A.H. Ulrich on the Possibility of Free Immoral Action

References

Allais, L. 2023. “Kantian Determinism and Contemporary Determinism.” In The Idea of Freedom: New Essays on the Kantian Theory of Freedom, edited by D. Heide, and E. Tiffany, 24–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198860563.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Baum, M. 2024. “Freiheit des Willens in der frühen Kant-Rezeption.” In Carl Christian Erhard Schmid (1761–1812), edited by M. Heinz, and G. Stiening, 361–80. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783111309279-016Search in Google Scholar

Beiser, F. 1987. The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674020696Search in Google Scholar

Bojanowski, J. 2006. Kants Theorie der Freiheit. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110909906Search in Google Scholar

Bondeli, M. 2018. “Freiheit, Gewissen und Gesetz. Zu Kants und Reinholds Disput über Willensfreiheit.” In Natur und Freiheit. Akten des XII. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, edited by V. Waibel, M. Ruffing, and D. Wagner, 529–44. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110467888-039Search in Google Scholar

Brandhorst, M. 2012. “Woran scheitert Kants Theorie der Freiheit?” In Sind wir Bürger zweier Welten?, edited by M. Brandhorst, A. Hahmann, and B. Ludwig, 279–310. Hamburg: Meiner.10.28937/978-3-7873-2285-5Search in Google Scholar

Breazeale, D. 2021. “Freedom and Duty: Kant, Reinhold, Fichte.” In Practical Philosophy from Kant to Hegel: Freedom, Right, and Revolution, edited by J. Clarke, and G. Gottlieb, 118–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108647441.008Search in Google Scholar

Cafagna, E. 2018. “Der Angriff von Ulrichs Determinismus und die Replik von Kraus und Kant.” In Kant und seine Kritiker, edited by A. Falduto, and H. Klemme, 13–28. Hildesheim: Olms.Search in Google Scholar

Chignell, A. 2007. “Belief in Kant.” The Philosophical Review 116 (3): 323–60.10.1215/00318108-2007-001Search in Google Scholar

Correia, F. 2005. Existential Dependence and Cognate Notions. Munich: Philosophia.10.2307/j.ctv2nrzj0hSearch in Google Scholar

Creuzer, L. 1793. Skeptische Betrachtungen über die Freyheit des Willens. Giessen: G.F. HeyerSearch in Google Scholar

Deligiorgi, K. 2021. “Freedom and Ethical Necessity: A Kantian Response to Ulrich (1788).” In Practical Philosophy from Kant to Hegel, edited by J. Clarke, and G. Gottlieb, 28–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108647441.003Search in Google Scholar

Di Giovanni, G. 2005. Freedom and Religion in Kant and His Immediate Successors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498084Search in Google Scholar

Fabbianelli, F. 2019. “Es giebt schlechterdings keinen Mittelweg zwischen Nothwendigkeit und Zufall, zwischen Determinismus und Indeterminismus.’ Die unmittelbare Rezeption des Kantischen Freiheitsbegriffs in der Aetas kantiana.” In Freiheit nach Kant: Tradition, Rezeption, Transformation, Aktualität, edited by S. Josifović, and J. Noller, 153–71. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004383586_009Search in Google Scholar

Falduto, A. 2018. “Freiheit zwischen Autonomie und Notwendigkeit. J.A.H. Ulrichs Eleutheriologie.” In Natur und Freiheit. Akten des XII. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, edited by V. Waibel, et al., 3395–402. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110467888-347Search in Google Scholar

Fichte, J. 1964–2012. Gesamtausgabe der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Stuttgart- Bad Canstatt: Frommann-Holzboog. [GA].Search in Google Scholar

Fine, K. 2012. “Guide to Ground.” In Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality, edited by F. Correia, and B. Schneider, 37–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139149136.002Search in Google Scholar

Guyer, P. 2018. “The Struggle for Freedom: Freedom of Will in Kant and Reinhold.” In Kant on Persons and Agency, edited by E. Watkins, 120–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316856529.008Search in Google Scholar

Guyer, P. 2024. Kant’s Impact on Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199592456.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Heinz, M., and G. Stiening, eds. 2024. Carl Christian Erhard Schmid (1761–1812). Spätaufklärung im Spannungsfeld zwischen Leibniz und Kant. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783111309279Search in Google Scholar

Hogan, D. 2013. “Metaphysical Motives of Kant’s Analytic-Synthetic Distinction.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 (2): 267–307. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2013.0032.Search in Google Scholar

Imhof, S. 2025. “Ulrich, Kant und Kraus über Moralität und moralische Zurechenbarkeit.” Kant- Studien 116 (2): 26–53. https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2024-2047.Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1900. “Kants Gesammelte Schriften.” In The Berlin-Branderburgischen (formerly Preussischen) Akademie der Wissenschften. Berlin: Reimer, De Gruyter. [AA].Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1992 In The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, edited by P. Guyer, and A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Klemme, H. 1999. “Die Freiheit der Willkür und die Herrschaft des Bösen. Kants Lehre vom radikalen Bösen zwischen Moral, Religion und Recht.” In Aufklärung und Interpretation: Studien zu Kants Philosophie und ihrem Umkreis, edited by H. Klemme, et al., 125–51. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Search in Google Scholar

Klemme, H. 2008. “Moralisches Sollen, Autonomie und Achtung. Kants Konzeption der ‘libertas indifferentiae’ zwischen Wolff und Crusius.” In Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, edited by V. Rohden, et al., 215–27. Berlin: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Kosch, M. 2006. Freedom and Reason in Kant, Schelling, and Kierkegaard. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199289115.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Leuenberger, S. 2014. “Grounding and Necessity.” Inquiry 57 (2): 151–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2013.855654.Search in Google Scholar

Maimon, S. 1793. Streifereien im Gebiete der Philosophie. Berlin: Wilhelm Vieweg.Search in Google Scholar

Maimon, S. 1794. “Versuch einer neuen Darstellung des Moralprinzips und Dedukzion seiner Realität.” Berlinische Monatsschrift 24: 402–53.Search in Google Scholar

Maimon, S. 1800. “Der Moralische Skeptiker.” Berlinisches Archiv der Zeit und ihres Geschmacks 2: 271–92.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, W. 2018. “Fichte’s Creuzer Review and the Transformation of the Free Will Problem.” European Journal of Philosophy 26 (2): 717–29, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12313.Search in Google Scholar

Noller, J. and J. Walsh, eds. and trans. 2022. Kant’s Early Critics on Freedom of the Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108687720Search in Google Scholar

Nuzzo, A. 1994. “Metamorphosen der Freiheit in der Jenenser Kant-Rezeption (1785–1794).” In Evolution des Geistes: Jena um 1800, edited by F. Strack, 484–519. Stuttgart: Klett- Cotta.Search in Google Scholar

Proops, I. 2021. The Fiery Test of Critique: A Reading of Kant’s Dialectic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199656042.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Reinhold, K. 1983 In Korrespondenzausgabe der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, edited by F. Fabbianelli, and I. Radrizzani. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog. [KA].Search in Google Scholar

Reinhold, K. 2004. “Beiträge zur Berichtigung Bisheriger Mißverständnisse der Philosophen.” In Zweyter Band, edited by F. Fabbianelli. Hamburg: Meiner.Search in Google Scholar

Reinhold, K. 2007 In Gesammelte Schriften. Kommentierte Ausgabe, edited by M. Bondeli Basel. Schwabe Verlag. [RGS].Search in Google Scholar

Rosen, G. 2010. “Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction.” In Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology, edited by B. Hale, and A. Hoffmann, 109–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199565818.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Rosenkoetter, T. 2018. “The Canon Problem and the Explanatory Priority of Capacities.” History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 21 (1): 216–34, https://doi.org/10.30965/26664275-02101011.Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, C. 1790/1792. Versuch einer Moralphilosophy. Jena: Cröker.Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, C. 1793. Grundriss der Moralphilosophie für Vorlesungen. Jena: Cröker.Search in Google Scholar

Stang, N. 2016. Kant’s Modal Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198712626.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Stang, N. 2018. “A Guide to Ground in Kant’s Lectures on Metaphysics.” In Kant’s Lectures on Metaphysics: A Critical Guide, edited by C. Fugate, 74–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316819142.005Search in Google Scholar

Stang, N. 2023. “Kant’s Schematism of the Categories: An Interpretation and Defence.” European Journal of Philosophy 31 (1): 30–64, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12761.Search in Google Scholar

Stolz, V., M. Heinz, and M. Bondeli, eds. 2012. Wille, Willkür, Freiheit. Reinholds Freiheitskonzeption im Kontext der Philosophie des 18. Jahrhunderts. Berlin: DeGruyter.10.1515/9783110273489Search in Google Scholar

Timmermann, J. 2007. Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511487316Search in Google Scholar

Ulrich, J. 1785. Institutiones Logicae et Metaphysicae. Jena: Cröker.Search in Google Scholar

Ulrich, J. 1788. Eleutheriologie oder über Freyheit und Nothwendigkeit. Jena: Cröker.Search in Google Scholar

Vaihinger, H. 1880. “Ein bisher unbekannter Aufsatz von Kant über die Freiheit.” Philosophischen Monatshefte 16: 193–208.Search in Google Scholar

Walsh, J. 2023a. “Karl Leonhard Reinhold’s Account of Free Will in Relation to Kant’s Religion Within the Boundaries of Mere Reason.” In Vorstellung, Denken, Sprache: Reinholds Philosophie zwischen rationalem Realismus und transzendentalem Idealismus, edited by M. Bondeli, and D. Westerkamp, 9–36. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783111239521-003Search in Google Scholar

Walsh, J. 2023b. “C.C.E. Schmid and the Doctrine of Intelligible Fatalism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 31 (5): 950–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2023.2166898.Search in Google Scholar

Walsh, J. 2023c. “Fichte’s Account of Free Will in Context.” Fichte-Studien 52 (1): 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1163/18795811-05201015.Search in Google Scholar

Walsh, J. 2024a. “Carl Christian Erhard Schmid’s Intelligible Fatalism in Context.” In Carl Christian Erhard Schmid (1761–1812), edited by M. Heinz, and G. Stiening, 313–38. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783111309279-014Search in Google Scholar

Walsh, J. 2024b. “Kant on the Supposed Incapacity to Transgress the Moral Law Freely.” In Problems of Reason: Kant in Context, edited by A. Falduto, 231–49. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783111502601-015Search in Google Scholar

Ware, O. 2019. “Freedom Immediately after Kant.” European Journal of Philosophy 27 (4): 865–81, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12428.Search in Google Scholar

Ware, O. 2020. Fichte’s Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ware, O. 2023. “Kant and the Fate of Freedom: 1788–1800.” In Freedom After Kant: From German Idealism to Ethics and the Self, edited by J. Saunders, 45–62. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781350187788.ch-3Search in Google Scholar

Watkins, E. 2021. “What Real Progress Has Metaphysics Made since the Time of Kant? Kant and the Metaphysics of Grounding.” Synthese 198 (Suppl. 13): 3213–229, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02180-2.Search in Google Scholar

Willaschek, M. 1992. Praktische Vernunft. Handlungstheorie und Moralbegründung bei Kant. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler Verlag.10.1007/978-3-476-05577-4Search in Google Scholar