Abstract
Kant’s argument that space, time, and the categories are the necessary forms of human experience are powerful; his transcendental idealism, that is, his arguments that spatiality and temporality in particular are only forms of human representation are not. His foundation of morality on the idea of preserving and promoting the maximal but equal freedom of all is profound; his conviction that human beings are always free to do what morality requires, based as it is on his transcendental idealism; is not. But his arguments that completeness in both scientific and moral knowledge are always only regulative ideals are compelling, with no corresponding downside.
References
I. Kant’s texts
Kant, Immanuel. 1996a. Practical Philosophy. Edited and translated by Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (G). Critique of Practical Reason (CpracR), Metaphysics of Morals (MM), DR = Doctrine of Right, DV = Doctrine of VirtueSearch in Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1996b. Religion and Rational Theology. Edited and translated by Allen W. Wood and George di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Religion within the Bounds of Mere Reason (RBMR) translated by George di Giovanni.Search in Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason (CpuR). Edited and translated by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment (CPR). Edited by Paul Guyer, translated by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2002. Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Edited by Henry Allison and Peter Heath, translated by Gary Hatfield, Michael Friedman, Henry Allison, and Peter Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics translated by Gary Hatfield.Search in Google Scholar
II. Other sources
Allais, Lucy. 2015. Manifest Reality: Kant’s Idealism and his Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. 1983. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. 2004. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense, Revised edition. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. 2011. Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. 2020. Baumgarten’s Elements of First Practical Philosophy: A Critical Translation with Kant’s Reflections on Moral Philosophy. Edited and translated by Courtney D. Fugate, and John Hymers. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Search in Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. 2024. Baumgarten’s Philosophical Ethics. Edited and translated by John Hymers. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Search in Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. 2014. Late German Idealism: Trendelenburg and Lotze. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bird, Graham. 1962. Kant’s Theory of Knowledge: An Outline of One Central Argument in the Critique of Pure Reason. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar
Byrd, B. Sharon. 1980. “Kant’s Theory of Punishment: Deterrence in its Threat, Retribution in its Execution.” Law and Philosophy 8: 151–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00160010.Search in Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1974. “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.” In Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47. Reprinted in Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984. Pp. 183–98.Search in Google Scholar
Friedman, Benjamin M. 2021. Religion and the Rise of Capitalism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Search in Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 1987. Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2014. Kant, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2016. Virtues of Freedom: Selected Essays on Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2017. “Transcendental Idealism: what and Why?” In The Palgrave Kant Handbook, edited by Matthew C. Altman, 71–90. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2018. “The Infinite Given Magnitude and Other Myths About Space and Time.” In Infinity in Early Modern Philosophy, edited by Ohad Nachtomy, and Reed Winegar, 181–204. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2020. Reason and Experience in Mendelssohn and Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2022. “The Empire of Ends.” In Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, Vol. 98, 204–37.Search in Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2024a. Kant’s Impact on Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2024b. The Moral Foundation of Right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. forthcoming. “Humanity, Right, and Ethics.” In Proceedings of the XIV. International Kant Congress, edited by Christoph Horn, et al.. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter & Co.Search in Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E.Jr, 1997. “Kant on Punishment: a Coherent Mix of Deterrence and Retribution?” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 5 (1997): 291-214, Reprinted in Hill, Respect, Pluralism, and Justice: Kantian Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. pp. 172–99.Search in Google Scholar
Insole, Christopher J. 2013. Kant and the Creation of Freedom: A Theological Problem. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Langton, Rael. 1998. Kantian Humility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1690. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Peter H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.Search in Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses. 1997. In Philosophical Writings, edited by Daniel O. Dahlstrom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. 2004. In Philosophical Writings, edited by Andrew Janiak. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Onof, Christian. 2023. “The Unicity, Infinity and Unity of Space.” Kantian Review 28: 273–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415423000109.Search in Google Scholar
Pistorius, Hermann Andreas. 1786. “Rezension zur J. Schulzes Erläuterungen zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft.” Allgemeine Deutsche Bibliothek 66.1, pp. 92–123, reprinted in Bernward Gesang, editor, Kants vergessener Rezensent: Die Kritik der theoretischen und praktischen Philosophie Kants in fünf Rezensionen von Hermann Andreas Pistorius. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2007. pp. 3–25.Search in Google Scholar
Rosefeldt, Tobias. 2007. “Dinge and sich und sekondäre Qualitäten.” In Kant in der Gegenwart, edited by Jürgen Stolzenberg, 167–209. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Shell, Susan Meld. 2025. ”Kant's Retributivist Turn: Punishment and Autonomy in the Feyerabend Lectures on Natural Right (and Later Writings)”. In Kant's Lectures on Political Philosophy: A Critical Guide edited by Frederick Rauscher, 328–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Schüssler, Rudolf. 2012. “Kant und die Kasuistik: Fragen zur Tugendlehre.” Kant-Studien 103: 70–95.Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston