Home Kant on Fear and Courage, Freedom and Anxiety
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Kant on Fear and Courage, Freedom and Anxiety

  • Bärbel Frischmann EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 3, 2025

Abstract

Fear and anxiety are constitutive of human nature. They inform us about danger and thus help us to protect ourselves from it. The topic of fear – anxiety does not play a significant role in Kant’s philosophy. Nevertheless, it serves as an informative example of how Kant views humanity. In his Anthropology from a Pragmatic Perspective Kant identifies – regarding fear – different degrees that correspond to his division into nature, temperament and character. Kant’s primary interest lies in repeatedly examining what it means to be human in relation to the central task of self-determination through one’s own reason. If reason succeeds in not allowing fear to dominate one’s actions, the person concerned demonstrates courage of character. Kant also recognized that there is a kind of anxiety of one’s own freedom, because autonomy requires courage, which should also be mentioned because of an interesting parallel to Kierkegaard’s important concept of anxiety.


Corresponding author: Bärbel Frischmann, Seminar für Philosophie, Universität Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany, E-mail:
I am very grateful to Elizabeth Millán Brusslan for her assistance in the translation and her helpful advice. Special issue of the “Journal for Transcendental Philosophy – Special Issue 2025”. “Kantian Legacies”.

References

Begemann, C. 1987. Furcht und Angst im Prozeß der Aufklärung. Zur Literatur und Bewußtseinsgeschichte des 18. Jahrhunderts. Frankfurt: Athenäum.Search in Google Scholar

Bergo, B. 2021. Anxiety. A Philosophical History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780197539712.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Blanke, T. 2006. Das Böse in der politischen Theorie. Die Furcht vor der Freiheit bei Kant, Hegel und vielen anderen. Bielefeld: transcript.10.1515/9783839404652Search in Google Scholar

Brandt, R. 1999. Kritischer Kommentar zu Kants Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht. Hamburg: Meiner.10.28937/978-3-7873-2796-6Search in Google Scholar

Fremstedal, R. 2020. “Kant and Existentialism: Inescapable Freedom and Self-Deception.” In The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism and Existentialism, edited by Jon Stewart. Basingstoke, 51-75. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-44571-3_3Search in Google Scholar

Frischmann, B. 2023. Angstwesen Mensch. Furcht, Ängste, Angst und was sie bedeuten. Berlin: J.B. Metzler.10.1007/978-3-662-67876-3Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1783. “Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?” In Kants Werke. Akademie Textausgabe, vol. VIII. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter [1968].Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1786. “Mutmaßlicher Anfang der Menschengeschichte.” In Kants Werke. Akademie Textausgabe, vol. VIII. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1968.Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1798. “Anthropologie in Pragmatischer Hinsicht.” In Kants Werke. Akademie Textausgabe, VII. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1996. “An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?” In Immanuel Kant. Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by Mary J. Gregor, 11–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813306.005Search in Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel 2006. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Translated and edited by Robert B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. 2013. “Conjectural Beginning of Human History.” In Anthropology, History, and Education, edited by Günter Zöller, and Robert B. Louden, 163–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kant-Lexikon 2015. Edited by Marcus Willaschek, Jürgen Stolzenberg, Georg Mohr, Stefano Bacin. Berlin: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, S. 1980. The Concept of Anxiety. Edited and Translated by Reidar Thomte in collaboration with Albert B. Anderson. Kierkegaards Writings, VIII. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rohls, J. 2014. “Kierkegaards Reflexionen über Geist und Sünde im Kontext des deutschen Idealismus.” In Kierkegaard im Kontext des deutschen Idealismus, edited by Axel Hutter, and Anders Moe Rasmussen, 203–40. Berlin: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Stewart, J. 2020. “Kierkegaard: A Transitional Figure from German Idealism to Existentialism.” In The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism and Existentialism, edited by Jon Stewart, 209–40. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-44571-3_9Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-07-04
Accepted: 2025-08-13
Published Online: 2025-09-03

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 5.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jtph-2025-0018/html
Scroll to top button