Abstract
This article examines the complicated legal-cultural process in which Roman law became Byzantine law and Roman legal discourse altered into Byzantine legal discourse. Roman law’s transformation into Early Byzantine law is analysed from the point of view of legal language which mutated from Latin to Greek. The approach is legal cultural and legal linguistic and focuses on the overall shape and general patterns. The goal is to highlight how legal-cultural transformation was incremental, language-bound and that there was no radical or sudden culmination point. Moreover, the analysis answers generally to the question of why sixth-century Byzantine legislative Greek contained frequent Latin loans, expressions, phrases and distortions. The discussion concentrates on the Novellae as an integral part of the process of legal cultural and linguistic change from Roman to Byzantine. Instead of going into detailed linguistic analysis, this article underlines generally the contextuality of law and the importance of legal culture
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Paul du Plessis, Heikki Mattila, and Heikki Pihlajamäki for their helpful comments on an earlier version of the article. The usual disclaimer applies.
References
Arjava, Antti. 2003. Law and life in the sixth-century near east. Acta Byzantina Fennica 2. 7–17.Search in Google Scholar
Avotins, Ivars. 1922. On the Greek of the novels of Justinian. Hildesheim: Olms-WeidmannSearch in Google Scholar
Beaucamp, Joëlle. 2005. L’histoire du droit byzantin face à la papyrologie juridique. Bilan et perspectives. Fontes Minores XI. 5–55.Search in Google Scholar
Bellomo, Manlio. 1995. The common legal past of Europe 1000–1800. Washington: Catholic Univ. of America Press.10.2307/j.ctt4cg8mjSearch in Google Scholar
Binder, Vera. 2016. Rhomaioi In Hubert Cancik & Helmuth Schneider (eds.), Brill’s new pauly antiquity volumes. Brill Online, 2016. Reference. http://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/brill-s-new-pauly/rhomaioi-e1022900 (accessed 18 February 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Bransma, Frank. 1995. Enige mededelingen over de ‘interpolatieneigingen’ van een der Digestencompilatoren. Groninger opmerkingen en mededelingen 12. 54–69.Search in Google Scholar
Buchholz, Matias. 2015. Römische Recht auf Griechisch. https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/153886Search in Google Scholar
Caenegem, R. C. 1995. A historical introduction to western constitutional law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139170871Search in Google Scholar
Chitwood, Zachary. 2012. Byzantine legal culture under the Macedonian Dynasty 867–1056. Princeton: Princeton University. http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01x346d420315 December 2015).Search in Google Scholar
Chitwood, Zachary. 2014. The Patriarch Alexios Stoudites and the reinterpretation of Justinianic legislation against heretics. Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 54. 293–312.Search in Google Scholar
Christophilopoulou, Aikaterina. 1986. Byzantine history A 324–610. Amsterdam: A. M. Hackert.10.1038/324610c0Search in Google Scholar
Du Plessis, Paul. 2008. The creation of legal principle. Roman Legal Tradition 4. 48–69.Search in Google Scholar
Du Plessis, Paul. 2015. Borkowski’s textbook on Roman law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/he/9780198736226.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Fögen, Marie Therese. 1986. Byzantinische Kommentare zu römischen Aktionen. Fontes Minores VIII. 215–248.Search in Google Scholar
Frankopan, Paul. 2009. Land and power in the middle and later period. In John F. Haldon (ed.), A social history of Byzantium, 112–142. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444305906.ch6Search in Google Scholar
Galdia, Marcus. 2014. Legal discourses. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-653-04812-4Search in Google Scholar
Garnsey, Peter & Caroline. Humfress 2001. The evolution of the late antique world. Cambridge: Orchard Academic.Search in Google Scholar
Griffin, Miriam. 2013. Politeia in Greek and Roman philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Haldon, John F. 1990. Byzantium in the seventh century: The transformation of a culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511582318Search in Google Scholar
Haldon, John F. 2010. Bysantin historia [History of Byzantium]. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.Search in Google Scholar
Harries, Jill. 2007. Roman law codes and the Roman legal tradition. In John W Cairns & Paul du Plessis (eds.), Beyond dogmatics: Law and society in the Roman world, 85–104. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1017/UPO9780748631773.007Search in Google Scholar
Harris, Jonathan. 2012. The end of Byzantium. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Herrin, Judith. 2007. Byzantium: The surprising life of a medieval empire. London: Penguin Books.10.1515/9781400832736Search in Google Scholar
Hoebel, E. Adamson. 1954. The law of primitive man: A study in comparative legal dynamics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674038707Search in Google Scholar
Honoré, Tony. 1978. Tribonian. London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey. 2008. Language, education, and literacy. In Elizabeth Jeffreys, John F. Haldon & Robin Cormack (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Byzantine studies, 777–784. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Humfress, Caroline. 2006. Law and legal practice in the age of Justinian. In Michael Maas (ed.), The Cambridge companion to the age of Justinian, 161–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL0521817463.007Search in Google Scholar
Husa, Jaakko. 2015. A new introduction to comparative law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.10.5040/9781849469531Search in Google Scholar
Hyland, Richard. 2009. Gifts: A study in comparative law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195343366.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Jestaz, Philippe & Christophe Jamin. 2004. La doctrine. Paris: Dalloz.Search in Google Scholar
Johnston, David. 1989. Justinian’s digest: The interpretation of interpolation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 9. 149–166.10.1093/ojls/9.2.149Search in Google Scholar
Johnston, David. 1999. Roman law in context. Port Chester, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511612138Search in Google Scholar
Kahane, Henry & Renée Kahane. 1992. Justinian’s Credo in western medieval literature. Byzantinische Zeitschrift 84–85. 37–42.10.1515/bz-1992-1-210Search in Google Scholar
Kantor, Georgy. 2012. Ideas oflaw in Hellenistic and Roman legal practice. In Paul Dresch & Hanna Skoda (eds.), Legalism: Anthropology and History, 55–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664269.003.0003Search in Google Scholar
Kazhdan, Alexander P. 1989. Do we need a new history of Byzantine law. Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik 39. 1–28.Search in Google Scholar
Kearley, Timothy G. 2010. The creation and transmission of Justinian’s novels. Law Library Journal 102. 377–397.10.2139/ssrn.1478686Search in Google Scholar
Kroll, Wilhelm (ed.). 1895. Corpus iuris civilis III: Novellae. Berlin: Weidmann.Search in Google Scholar
Kroncke, Jedidah. 2012. Law and development as Anti-Comparative Law. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 45. 477–555.Search in Google Scholar
Krumbacher, Karl. 2001[1897]. The history of Byzantine literature: From Justinian to the end of the eastern Roman empire. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.Search in Google Scholar
Lavigne, Clare-Hèléne. 2005. Droit, traduction, langue et idéologie: Kata poda ou la traduction pas à pas selon Justinien 1er. Traduction, Terminologié, Rédaction 18. 183–202.10.7202/014372arSearch in Google Scholar
Letto-Vanamo, Pia. 2003. Roomalainen oikeus – menneisyyden jäänne vai tulevaisuuden toivo? [Roman Law: Relic of the Past or Future’s Hope?]. Lakimies 101. 1084–1097.Search in Google Scholar
Lokin, Jan. 1995. Codificatie in constantinopel?: Enige opmerkingen over de wetgevingstechniek van theodosius II en Justinianus I. Groninger Opmerkingen en Mededelingen XII. 38–53.Search in Google Scholar
Loschiavo, Luca. 2015. Was Rome still a centre of legal culture between the 6th and 8th centuries? Rechtsgeschichte 23. 83–108.10.12946/rg23/083-108Search in Google Scholar
Louth, Andrew. 2005. The eastern Empire in the sixth century. In Paul Fouracre (ed.), The new Cambridge medieval history, vol. 1, 93–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521362917.006Search in Google Scholar
Lowden, John. 2008. Book production. In Elizabeth Jeffreys, John F. Haldon & Robin Cormack (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Byzantine studies, 462–472. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lysyk, Stephanie. 1998. Purple prose: Writing, Rhetoric and property in the Justinian’s corpus. Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature 10. 33–53.10.2307/743362Search in Google Scholar
Mattila, Heikki E. S. 2013. Comparative legal linguistics, 2nd edn. Farnham: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar
Mcginn, Thomas A. J. 2015. The expressive function of law and the lex imperfecta. Roman Legal Tradition 11. 1–41.Search in Google Scholar
Meyer, Elisabeth A. 2008. Legitimacy and law in the Roman world: Tabulae in Roman belief and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Monateri, Pier Giuseppe. 2015. Civil law system In Jürgen Backhaus, (ed.), Encyclopedia of law and economics. New York: Springer. http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_591-1 (accessed 10 December 2015).10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_591-1Search in Google Scholar
Mousorakis, George. 2007. Legal history of Rome. London/New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203089347Search in Google Scholar
Obolensky, Dimitri. 1971. Byzantine commonwealth. Eastern Europe, 500–1453. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Search in Google Scholar
Oikonomides, Nikos. 1986. The “Peira” of Eustathios Romaios: An abortive attempt to innovate in Byzantine Law. Fontes Minores VII. 169–192.Search in Google Scholar
Penna, Dafni. 2012. The Byzantine imperial acts to Venice, Pisa and Genoa 10th–12th century – a comparative legal study. The Hague: Eleven.Search in Google Scholar
Pieler, Peter E. 1989. Ανακάθαρσις τῶν παλαιῶν νόμων und makedonische Renaissance. Subseciva Groningana 3. 61–77.Search in Google Scholar
Prinzing, Günter. 1986. Das Bild Justinians I. in der Überlieferung der Byzantiner vom 7. bis 15 Jahrhundert. Fontes Minores VII. 1–99.Search in Google Scholar
Rosen, Lawrence. 2008. Law as culture: An invitation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Rosen, William. 2007. Justinianʼs flea: The first great plague and the end of the Roman empire. London: Jonathan Cape.Search in Google Scholar
Roudometof, Victor. 1998. From Rum Millet to Greek Nation: Enlightenment, secularization and national identity in Ottoman Balkan Society, 1453–1821. Journal of Modern Greek Studies 16. 11–48.10.1353/mgs.1998.0024Search in Google Scholar
Scheltema, Herman Jan. 1977. Das Kommentarverbot Justinians. Tijdschrift voor Rechtgeschiedenis 45. 307–331.10.1163/15718190-90000379Search in Google Scholar
Schenker, Alexander M. 1993. The dawn of Slavic: An introduction to Slavic philology. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Schmink, Andreas. 2005. Bemerkungen zum sog. “Nomos Mosaïkos”. Fontes minores XI. 249–268.Search in Google Scholar
Simon, Dieter. 1973. Rechtsfindung am byzantinischen reichsgericht. wissenschaft und gegenwart. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Search in Google Scholar
Simon, Dieter. 1988. Die Epochen der byzantinischen Rechtsgeschichte. Ius commune 15. 73–106.Search in Google Scholar
Sirks, Boudewijn. 2008. Laesio enormis again. Revue internationale des droits de l’antiquité 54. 461–469.Search in Google Scholar
Stein, Peter. 1988. Roman law. In J.H. Burns (ed.), The Cambridge history of medieval political thought c. 350–1450, vol. 2, 37–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.005Search in Google Scholar
Stein, Peter. 1993. Justinian’s compilation: Classical legacy and legal source. Tulane European Civil Law Forum 8. 2–14.Search in Google Scholar
Stein, Peter. 1999. Roman law in European history. Port Chester, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511814723Search in Google Scholar
Stolte, Bernard. 1988. Not New But Novel: Notes on the Historiography of Byzantine Law. Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 22. 264–279.10.1179/byz.1998.22.1.264Search in Google Scholar
Stolte, Bernard. 2003. Is Byzantine law Roman law? Acta Byzantina Fennica 2. 111–126.Search in Google Scholar
Stolte, Bernard. 2005. Balancing Byzantine law. Fontes Minores XI. 57–75.Search in Google Scholar
Stolte, Bernard. 2008. Justice: Legal literature. In Elizabeth Jeffreys, John F. Haldon & Robin Cormack (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Byzantine studies, 691–698. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Stolte, Bernard. 2009a. The social function of the law. In John Haldon, (ed.), A social history of Byzantium, 76–91. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444305906.ch4Search in Google Scholar
Stolte, Bernard. 2009b. The use of Greek in the Theodosian Code. Subseciva Groningana VIII. 147–160.Search in Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2001. A general jurisprudence of law and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244676.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2011. The Primacy of Society and the Failures of Law and Development. Cornell International Law Journal 44. 209–247.Search in Google Scholar
Treadgold, Warren. 1979. The revival of Byzantine learning and the revival of the Byzantine state. American Historical Review 84. 1245–1266.10.2307/1861467Search in Google Scholar
Troianos, Spyridon. 2011. Οι πηγές του βυζαντινού δικαίου, 3rd edn. Athens: Sakkoulas.Search in Google Scholar
Van Der Wal, Nikolas. 1983. Die Schreibweise der dem lateinischen entlehnten Fachworte in der frühbyzantinischen Juristensprache. Scriptorium 37. 29–53.10.3406/scrip.1983.1293Search in Google Scholar
Watson, Alan. 1994. The importance of nutshells. American Journal of Comparative Law 42. 1–23.10.2307/840726Search in Google Scholar
Weimar, Peter. 2001. Irnerius. In Juristen – Ein biographisches Lexikon, 325–327. München: C.H. Beck.Search in Google Scholar
Wieacker, Franz. 1981. The importance of Roman law for western civilization and western legal thought. Boston College International Comparative Law Review 4. 257–281.Search in Google Scholar
Wieacker, Franz. 1995. A history of private law in Europe. Oxford: Claredon Press.10.1093/oso/9780198258612.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Zepos, Panagiotis J. 1974. The legacy of civil law. Louisiana Law Review 34. 895–906.Search in Google Scholar
Zilliacus, Henrik. 1935. Zum kampf der weltsprachen im oströmischen reich. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopisto.Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
 - Introduction
 - On drafting, interpreting, and translating legal texts across languages and cultures
 - Research Articles
 - Discourse, interests, and the law: Some pragma-legal reflections
 - Communities of message senders and recipients in legal settings and their communicative needs. The translator’s perspective
 - Arguments of statutory interpretation and argumentation schemes
 - Transformation of legal language – Early Byzantine legal discourse
 - A forensic linguistics problem: Asylum seekers’ dialect identification difficulties in under-documented adjacent Arabic dialects
 - Compiling terminology in EU directives and national transplant regulations. Case study: Sweden and Poland
 - “There are no words that are ‘clear’ in and of themselves”: Meta-pragmatic comments and semantic analysis in legal interpretation
 
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
 - Introduction
 - On drafting, interpreting, and translating legal texts across languages and cultures
 - Research Articles
 - Discourse, interests, and the law: Some pragma-legal reflections
 - Communities of message senders and recipients in legal settings and their communicative needs. The translator’s perspective
 - Arguments of statutory interpretation and argumentation schemes
 - Transformation of legal language – Early Byzantine legal discourse
 - A forensic linguistics problem: Asylum seekers’ dialect identification difficulties in under-documented adjacent Arabic dialects
 - Compiling terminology in EU directives and national transplant regulations. Case study: Sweden and Poland
 - “There are no words that are ‘clear’ in and of themselves”: Meta-pragmatic comments and semantic analysis in legal interpretation