Home Life Sciences Rates of anastomotic leak and fistula following surgical management of bowel endometriosis: a comparison of shaving, discoid excision, and segmental resection
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Rates of anastomotic leak and fistula following surgical management of bowel endometriosis: a comparison of shaving, discoid excision, and segmental resection

  • Jordan S. Klebanoff , Whitney A. Barnes , Katherine Denny , Marissa G. Mangini , Jamil Kazma , Antonio Simone Laganà , Nassir Habib , Jean Marc Ayoubi and Gaby N. Moawad ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 19, 2021

Abstract

Endometriosis is a complex chronic inflammatory condition that can create a multitude of bothersome painful symptoms for women. Bowel endometriosis is often misdiagnosed or overlooked leading to years of suffering for many women. The surgical management of bowel endometriosis varies based on extent of disease as well as surgeon experience. Surgical treatment for bowel endometriosis is complex and a variety of intraoperative and postoperative complications must be considered. Two significant postoperative complications for bowel endometriosis include anastomotic leak and fistula formation. There is continued debate regarding the appropriate surgical treatment for bowel endometriosis. Aggressive surgery with segmental bowel resection is being utilized more cautiously, with an increase in less aggressive shaving or disc excision techniques. Historic beliefs regarding the limitations of shaving and disc excision are being challenged, and with a reduction in morbidity these less aggressive techniques are winning favor among gynecologic surgeons. Shaving, discoid excision, and segmental bowel resection are all feasible surgical management options for bowel endometriosis. Segmental resection is associated with the highest rates of both anastomotic leak and fistula formation, while shaving is associated with the lowest.


Corresponding author: Gaby N. Moawad, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, The George Washington University Hospital, 2150 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20037, USA, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: Authors state no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Dr. Moawad is a speaker for Intuitive Surgical. No other conflicts of interest declared.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent is not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animals use.

References

1. Kuznetsov, L, Dworzynski, K, Davies, M, Overton, C. Diagnosis and management of endometriosis: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2017;358:1–5.10.1136/bmj.j3935Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Nezhat, C, Li, A, Falik, R, Copeland, D, Razavi, G, Shakib, A, et al.. Bowel endometriosis: diagnosis and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;218:549–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.09.023.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Veeraswamy, A, Lewis, M, Mann, A, Kotikela, S, Hajhosseini, B, Nezhat, C. Extragenital endometriosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2010;53:449–66. https://doi.org/10.1097/grf.0b013e3181e0ea6e.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Noventa, M, Scioscia, M, Schincariol, M, Cavallin, F, Pontrelli, G, Virgilio, B, et al.. Imaging modalities for diagnosis of deep pelvic endometriosis: comparison between trans-vaginal sonography, rectal endoscopy sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. A head-to-head meta-analysis. Diagnostics 2019;9. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics9040225.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Skoog, SM, Foxx-Orenstein, AE, Levy, MJ, Rajan, E, Session, DR. Intestinal endometriosis: the great masquerader. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2004;6:405–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-004-0058-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Donnez, O, Roman, H. Choosing the right surgical technique for deep endometriosis: shaving, disc excision, or bowel resection? Fertil Steril 2017;108:931–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Graham, A, Chen, S, Skancke, M, Moawad, G, Obias, V. A review of deep infiltrative colorectal endometriosis treated robotically at a single institution. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 2019;15:1–5.10.1002/rcs.2001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Daraï, E, Dubernard, G, Coutant, C, Frey, C, Rouzier, R, Ballester, M. Randomized trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open colorectal resection for endometriosis: morbidity, symptoms, quality of life, and fertility. Ann Surg 2010;251:1018–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181d9691d.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Oliveira, MAP, Pereira, TRD, Gilbert, A, Tulandi, T, de Oliveira, HC, De Wilde, RL. Bowel complications in endometriosis surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2016;35:51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.11.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Kondo, W, Bourdel, N, Tamburro, S, Cavoli, D, Jardon, K, Rabischong, B, et al.. Complications after surgery for deeply infiltrating pelvic endometriosis. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2011;118:292–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02774.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Laganà, AS, Vitale, SG, Trovato, MA, Palmara, VI, Rapisarda, AM, Granese, R, et al.. Full-thickness excision versus shaving by laparoscopy for intestinal deep infiltrating endometriosis: rationale and potential treatment options. Biomed Res Int 2016;2016:3617179. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3617179.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Darwish, B, Roman, H. Surgical treatment of deep infiltrating rectal endometriosis: in favor of less aggressive surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;215:195–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.189.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Afors, K, Centini, G, Fernandes, R, Murtada, R, Zupi, E, Akladios, C, et al.. Segmental and discoid resection are preferential to bowel shaving for medium-term symptomatic relief in patients with bowel endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016;23:1123–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.813.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Donnez, J, Squifflet, J. Complications, pregnancy and recurrence in a prospective series of 500 patients operated on by the shaving technique for deep rectovaginal endometriotic nodules. Hum Reprod 2010;25:1949–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq135.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Roman, H, FRIENDS group (French coloRectal Infiltrating Endometriosis Study group). A national snapshot of the surgical management of deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum and colon in France in 2015: a multicenter series of 1135 cases. J Gynecol Obs Hum Reprod 2017;46:159–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2016.09.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Nezhat, C, Nezhat, F, Pennington, E, Nezhat, CH, Ambroze, W. Laparoscopic disk excision and primary repair of the anterior rectal wall for the treatment of full-thickness bowel endometriosis. Surg Endosc 1994;8:682–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00678566.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Landi, S, Pontrelli, G, Surico, D, Ruffo, G, Benini, M, Soriano, D, et al.. Laparoscopic disk resection for bowel endometriosis using a circular stapler and a new endoscopic method to control postoperative bleeding from the stapler line. J Am Coll Surg 2008;207:205–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.02.037.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Mohr, C, Nezhat, F, Nezhat, CH, Seidman, D, Nezhat, C. Fertility considerations in laparoscopic treatment of infiltrative bowel endometriosis. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2005;9:16–24.Search in Google Scholar

19. Abo, C, Moatassim, S, Marty, N, Saint Ghislain, M, Huet, E, Bridoux, V, et al.. Postoperative complications after bowel endometriosis surgery by shaving, disc excision, or segmental resection: a three-arm comparative analysis of 364 consecutive cases. Fertil Steril 2018;109:172–8.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Abrao, MS, Sagae, UE, Gonzales, M, Podgaec, S, Dias, JAJ. Treatment of recosigmoid endometriosis by laparoscopically assisted vaginal rectosigmoidectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005;91:27–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.06.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Fanfani, F, Fagotti, A, Gagliardi, ML, Ruffo, G, Ceccaroni, M, Scambia, G, et al.. Discoid or segmental rectosigmoid resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis: a case-control study. Fertil Steril 2010;94:444–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.066.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Nezhat, C, Nezhat, F, Pennington, E. Laparoscopic treatment of infiltrative rectosigmoid colon and rectovaginal septum endometriosis by the technique of videolaparoscopy and the CO2 laser. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:664–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13851.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Jayot, A, Bendifallah, S, Abo, C, Arfi, A, Owen, C, Darai, E. Feasibility, complications, and recurrence after discoid resection for colorectal endometriosis: a series of 93 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019;27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.07.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Millochau, J-C, Stochino-Loi, E, Darwish, B, Abo, C, Coget, J, Chati, R, et al.. Multiple nodule removal by disc excision and segmental resection in multifocal colorectal endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2018;25:139–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.09.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Raffaelli, R, Garzon, S, Baggio, S, Genna, M, Pomini, P, Simone, A, et al.. Mesenteric vascular and nerve sparing surgery in laparoscopic segmental intestinal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018;231:214–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.10.057.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Darai, E, Thomassin, I, Barranger, E, Detchev, R, Cortez, A, Houry, S, et al.. Feasibility and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:394–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.08.033.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Thiels, CA, Shenoy, CC, Ubl, DS, Habermann, EB, Kelley, SR, Mathis, KL. Rates, trends, and short-term outcomes of colorectal resections for endometriosis: an ACS-NSQIP review. Int J Surg 2016;31:5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.05.039.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. De Cicco, C, Corona, R, Schonman, R, Mailova, K, Ussia, A, Koninckx, PR. Bowel resection for deep endometriosis: a systematic review. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2011;118:285–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02744.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Roman, H, Rozsnayi, F, Puscasiu, L, Resch, B, Belhiba, H, Lefebure, B, et al.. Complications associated with two laparoscopic procedures used in the management of rectal endometriosis. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2010;14:169–77. https://doi.org/10.4293/108680810x12785289143800.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Moawad, NS, Caplin, A. Diagnosis, management, and long-term outcomes of rectovaginal endometriosis. Int J Womens Health 2013;5:753–63. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijwh.s37846.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. Ruffo, G, Sartori, A, Crippa, S, Partelli, S, Barugola, G, Manzoni, A, et al.. Laparoscopic rectal resection for severe endometriosis of the mid and low rectum: technique and operative results. Surg Endosc 2012;26:1035–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1991-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Renner, SP, Kessler, H, Topal, N, Proske, K, Adler, W, Burghaus, S, et al.. Major and minor complications after anterior rectal resection for deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017;295:1277–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4360-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Byrne, D, Curnow, T, Smith, P, Cutner, A, Saridogan, E, Clark, TJ. Laparoscopic excision of deep rectovaginal endometriosis in BSGE endometriosis centres: a multicentre prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2018;8:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018924.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

34. Zheng, Y, Zhang, N, Lu, W, Zhang, L, Gu, S, Zhang, Y, et al.. Rectovaginal fistula following surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis: does lesion size matter? J Int Med Res 2018;46:852–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060517728208.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35. Morks, AN, Ploeg, RJ, Sijbrand Hofker, H, Wiggers, T, Havenga, K. Late anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a significant problem. Colorectal Dis 2013;15. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12167.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Bendifallah, S, Puchar, A, Vesale, E, Moawad, GN, Darai, E, Roman, H, et al.. Outcomes and complications after surgery for colorectal endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the shaving, discoid, and segmental resection. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020;S1553-4650:30395–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.08.015.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Donnez, J, Jadoul, P, Colette, S, Luyckx, M, Squifflet, J, Donnez, O. Deep rectovaginal endometriotic nodules: perioperative complications from a series of 3,298 patients operated on by the shaving technique. Gynecol Surg 2013;10:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-012-0759-z.Search in Google Scholar

38. Meuleman, C, Tomassetti, C, D’Hooghe, TM. Clinical outcome after laparoscopic radical excision of endometriosis and laparoscopic segmental bowel resection. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2012;24:245–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283556285.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2020-09-16
Accepted: 2021-02-03
Published Online: 2021-02-19

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Special Issue 1: Adenomyosis and Endometriosis: An Update; Edited by René Druckmann and Adolf E. Schindler
  3. Review Articles
  4. The impact of endometriosis on the outcome of assisted reproductive techniques: role of fertility preservation
  5. A narrative review of functional outcomes following nerve-sparing surgery for deeply infiltrating endometriosis
  6. Appropriate surgical management of ovarian endometrioma: excision or drainage?
  7. Diaphragmatic endometriosis and thoracic endometriosis syndrome: a review on diagnosis and treatment
  8. Rates of anastomotic leak and fistula following surgical management of bowel endometriosis: a comparison of shaving, discoid excision, and segmental resection
  9. Endometriosis at all ages: diagnostic ultrasound
  10. Special Issue 2: Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients and Survivors; Edited by René Druckmann and Adolf E. Schindler
  11. Opinion Paper
  12. Quality of life and sexual dysfunction in gynaecological cancer patients: a psychosomatic approach
  13. Review Articles
  14. Fertility preservation in women with early ovarian cancer
  15. Fertility in BRCA mutation carriers: counseling BRCA-mutated patients on reproductive issues
  16. Fertility preservation in borderline ovarian tumor patients and survivors
  17. Regular Issue
  18. Original Articles
  19. Effects of iron-related compounds and bilirubin on redox homeostasis in endometriosis and its malignant transformations
  20. miR-515-3p, miR-623, miR-1272 and Notch3 protein as new biomarkers of Hepatocellular carcinoma
  21. Combination therapy of calcitriol inhibits the proliferation of breast cancer cells: new concept of nonclassical function of calcitriol
  22. The change pattern in serum G protein-coupled estrogen receptor-1 (GPER1) levels during pregnancy with and without gestational diabetes mellitus
  23. Effects of Helichrysum Psudoplicatum supplementation on pruritus intensity, fatigue, quality of life and anorexia in hemodialysis patients: a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial
  24. The anticancer and free radical scavenging potential of the Unani medicine Agaricus albus L.
  25. Review Articles
  26. What is the optimal luteal support in assisted reproductive technology?
  27. The relation between obesity, kisspeptin, leptin, and male fertility
Downloaded on 22.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/hmbci-2020-0065/html
Scroll to top button