Home Instrumented treadmill for run biomechanics analysis: a comparative study
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Instrumented treadmill for run biomechanics analysis: a comparative study

  • Marco Bravi , Fabio Santacaterina ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Federica Bressi , Michelangelo Morrone , Andrea Renzi , Joshua Di Tocco , Emiliano Schena , Silvia Sterzi and Carlo Massaroni
Published/Copyright: June 12, 2023

Abstract

This study aims compare the spatiotemporal and kinematic running parameters obtained by the WalkerView (Tecnobody, Bergamo, Italy) with those recorded by a optoelectronic 3D motion capture system. Seventeen participants were simultaneously recorded by the WalkerView and a motion capture system during running tests on the WalkerView at two different speeds (i.e., 8 km/h and 10 km/h). Per each parameter and speed the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the mean of the difference (MOD) and limits of agreement (LOAs) indexes obtained from Bland-Altman analysis were used to compare the two systems. ICCs show an excellent agreement for the mean step time and the cadence at both testing speeds (ICC=0.993 at 8 km/h; ICC=0.998 at 10 km/h); a lower agreement was found for all the kinematic variables. Small differences for some spatio-temporal parameters and greater differences for the kinematic variables were found. Therefore, WalkerView could represent a practical, accessible, and less expensive tool for clinicians, researchers, and sports trainers to assess the characteristics spatio-temporal parameters of running in non-laboratory settings.


Corresponding author: Fabio Santacaterina, Research Unit of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy, Phone: +39 0622541629, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: The research related to human use has complied with all the relevant national regulations, institutional policies, and in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Università Campus Bio-Medico (64.1 (18) .19 OSS ComEt-UCBM).

References

1. Hulteen, RM, Smith, JJ, Morgan, PJ, Barnett, LM, Hallal, PC, Colyvas, K, et al.. Global participation in sport and leisure-time physical activities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med 2017;95:14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.11.027.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Van Gent, RN, Siem, D, van Middelkoop, M, van Os, AG, Bierma-Zeinstra, SMA, Koes, BW, et al.. Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance runners: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2007;41:469. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2006.033548.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Chan, ZYS, Zhang, JH, Au, IP, An, WW, Shum, GL, Ng, GY, et al.. Gait retraining for the reduction of injury occurrence in novice distance runners: 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 2018;46:388–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517736277.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Higginson, BK. Methods of running gait analysis. Curr Sports Med Rep 2009;8:136–41. https://doi.org/10.1249/jsr.0b013e3181a6187a.Search in Google Scholar

5. García-Pinillos, F, Roche-Seruendo, LE, Marcén-Cinca, N, Marco-Contreras, LA, Latorre-Román, PA. Absolute reliability and concurrent validity of the stryd system for the assessment of running stride kinematics at different velocities. J Strength Condit Res 2021;35:78–84. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000002595.Search in Google Scholar

6. Bredeweg, SW, Kluitenberg, B, Bessem, B, Buist, I. Differences in kinetic variables between injured and noninjured novice runners: a prospective cohort study. J Sci Med Sport 2013;16:205–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2012.08.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Schubert, AG, Kempf, J, Heiderscheit, BC. Influence of stride frequency and length on running mechanics. Sport Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach 2014;6:210–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738113508544.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Edwards, WB, Taylor, D, Rudolphi, TJ, Gillette, JC, Derrick, TR. Effects of stride length and running mileage on a probabilistic stress fracture model. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009;41:2177–84. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e3181a984c4.Search in Google Scholar

9. Heiderscheit, BC, Chumanov, ES, Michalski, MP, Wille, CM, Ryan, MB. Effects of step rate manipulation on joint mechanics during running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011;43:296–302. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e3181ebedf4.Search in Google Scholar

10. Wellenkotter, J, Kernozek, TW, Meardon, S, Suchomel, T. The effects of running cadence manipulation on plantar loading in healthy runners. Int J Sports Med 2014;35:779–84. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1363236.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Adams, D, Pozzi, F, Willy, RW, Carrol, A, Zeni, J. Altering cadence or vertical oscillation during running: effects on running related injury factors. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2018;13:633–42. https://doi.org/10.26603/ijspt20180633.Search in Google Scholar

12. Mihcin, S, Ciklacandir, S, Kocak, M, Tosun, A. Wearable motion capture system evaluation for biomechanical studies for hip joints. J Biomech Eng 2021;143:044504. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4049199.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Mihcin, S. Simultaneous validation of wearable motion capture system for lower body applications: over single plane range of motion (ROM) and gait activities. Biomed Tech 2022;67:185–99. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2021-0429.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Rowe, P, Myles, C, Hillmann, S, Hazlewood, M. Validation of flexible electrogoniometry as a measure of joint kinematics. Physiotherapy 2001;87:479–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9406(05)60695-5.Search in Google Scholar

15. Tao, H, Joyce, L, Kozak, B, Luiken, J, Wendt, N. Spatiotemporal comparison of overground and treadmill running with pressure sensor insoles in division I collegiate runners. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2019;14:731. https://doi.org/10.26603/ijspt20190731.Search in Google Scholar

16. Mayagoitia, RE, Nene, AV, Veltink, PH. Accelerometer and rate gyroscope measurement of kinematics: an inexpensive alternative to optical motion analysis systems. J Biomech 2002;35:537–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00231-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Bravi, M, Gallotta, E, Morrone, M, Maselli, M, Santacaterina, F, Toglia, R, et al.. Concurrent validity and inter trial reliability of a single inertial measurement unit for spatial-temporal gait parameter analysis in patients with recent total hip or total knee arthroplasty. Gait Posture 2020;76:175–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.12.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Camomilla, V, Bergamini, E, Fantozzi, S, Vannozzi, G. Trends supporting the in-field use of wearable inertial sensors for sport performance evaluation: a systematic review. Sensors 2018;18:873. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18030873.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Massaroni, C, Di Tocco, J, Sabbadini, R, Carnevale, A, Lo Presti, D, Schena, E, et al.. Influence of torso movements on a multi-sensor garment for respiratory monitoring during walking and running activities. In: 2020 IEEE international instrumentation and measurement technology conference (I2MTC); 2020:1–6 pp.10.1109/I2MTC43012.2020.9128754Search in Google Scholar

20. Neumann, DA. Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system foundations for rehabilitation. Riverport Lane St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier - Health Sciences Division; 2016:595 p.Search in Google Scholar

21. Riley, PO, Dicharry, J, Franz, J, Croce, UD, Wilder, RP, Kerrigan, DC. A kinematics and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008;40:1093–100. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e3181677530.Search in Google Scholar

22. Patoz, A, Lussiana, T, Breine, B, Gindre, C, Malatesta, D. Accurate estimation of peak vertical ground reaction force using the duty factor in level treadmill running. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2023;33:169–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.14252.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Mann, R, Malisoux, L, Brunner, R, Gette, P, Urhausen, A, Statham, A, et al.. Reliability and validity of pressure and temporal parameters recorded using a pressure-sensitive insole during running. Gait Posture 2014;39:455–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.08.026.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Folland, JP, Allen, SJ, Black, MI, Handsaker, JC, Forrester, SE. Running technique is an important component of running economy and performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2017;49:1412–23. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000001245.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Hamner, SR, Seth, A, Delp, SL. Muscle contributions to propulsion and support during running. J Biomech 2010;43:2709–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.06.025.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Napier, C, MacLean, CL, Maurer, J, Taunton, JE, Hunt, MA. Kinematic correlates of kinetic outcomes associated with running-related injury. J Appl Biomech 2019;35:123–30. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2018-0203.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Roggio, F, Ravalli, S, Maugeri, G, Bianco, A, Palma, A, Di Rosa, M, et al.. Technological advancements in the analysis of human motion and posture management through digital devices. World J Orthoped 2021;12:467. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v12.i7.467.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Roggio, F, Trovato, B, Zanghì, M, Petrigna, L, Testa, G, Pavone, V, et al.. Running footwear and impact peak differences in recreational runners. Biology 2022;11:818. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11060818.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Bravi, M, Massaroni, C, Santacaterina, F, Di Tocco, J, Schena, E, Sterzi, S, et al.. Validity analysis of WalkerViewTM instrumented treadmill for measuring spatiotemporal and kinematic gait parameters. Sensors 2021;21:4795. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21144795.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Lafayette, TBDG, Melo, PVS, Guedes, PO, Teixeira, JMXN, Vasconcelos, CR, et al.. Validation of angle estimation based on body tracking data from RGB-D and RGB cameras for biomechanical assessment. Sensors 2023;23:3. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. Haimovich, Y, Hershkovich, O, Portnoy, S, Schwartz, I, Lotan, R. Evaluating lower limb kinematics using microsoft’s kinect: a simple, novel method. Physiother Can 2021;73:391. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc-2020-0051.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. Bernardina, GRD, Monnet, T, Cerveri, P, Silvatti, AP. Moving system with action sport cameras: 3D kinematics of the walking and running in a large volume. PLoS One 2019;14:e0224182. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224182.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Benedetti, MG, Beghi, E, De Tanti, A, Cappozzo, A, Basaglia, N, Cutti, AG, et al.. SIAMOC position paper on gait analysis in clinical practice: general requirements, methods and appropriateness. Results of an Italian consensus conference. Gait Posture 2017;58:252–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.08.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Davis, RB, Õunpuu, S, Tyburski, D, Gage, JR. A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Mov Sci 1991;10:575–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(91)90046-z.Search in Google Scholar

35. Stief, F. Variations of marker sets and models for standard gait analysis. In: Müller B, Wolf SI, Brüggemann GP, Deng Z, McIntosh AS, Miller F, et al., editors. Handbook of human motion. Berlin: Springer; 2018:1–2543 pp.10.1007/978-3-319-14418-4_26Search in Google Scholar

36. McGinley, JL, Baker, R, Wolfe, R, Morris, ME. The reliability of three-dimensional kinematic gait measurements: a systematic review. Gait Posture 2009;29:360–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.09.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Van De Putte, M, Hagemeister, N, St-Onge, N, Parent, G, De Guise, JA. Habituation to treadmill walking. Bio Med Mater Eng 2006;16:43–52.Search in Google Scholar

38. Lavcanska, V, Taylor, NF, Schache, AG. Familiarization to treadmill running in young unimpaired adults. Hum Mov Sci 2005;24:544–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2005.08.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Cicchetti, DV, Sparrow, SA. Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. Am J Ment Defic 1981;86:127–37.Search in Google Scholar

40. Giavarina, D. Understanding Bland altman analysis. Biochem Med 2015;25:141. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2015.015.Search in Google Scholar

41. Altman, DG, Bland, JM. Measurement in medicine : the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 1983;32:307–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/2987937.Search in Google Scholar

42. Osborne, JW, Overbay, A. The power of outliers (and why researchers should ALWAYS check for them). Practical Assess Res Eval 2019;9:6.Search in Google Scholar

43. Castillo-Domínguez, A, García-Romero, JC, Páez-Moguer, J, Ponce-García, T, Medina-Alcántara, M, Alvero-Cruz, JR. Relationship between running spatiotemporal kinematics and muscle performance in well-trained youth female athletes. A cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2021;18:8869. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168869.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

44. Gómez-Molina, J, Ogueta-Alday, A, Stickley, C, Cámara, J, Cabrejas-Ugartondo, J, García-López, J. Differences in spatiotemporal parameters between trained runners and untrained participants. J Strength Condit Res 2017;31:2169–75. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000001679.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

45. Tamura, H, Tanaka, R, Kawanishi, H. Reliability of a markerless motion capture system to measure the trunk, hip and knee angle during walking on a flatland and a treadmill. J Biomech 2020;109:109929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109929.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

46. Wei, TS, Liu, PT, Chang, LW, Liu, SY. Gait asymmetry, ankle spasticity, and depression as independent predictors of falls in ambulatory stroke patients. PLoS One 2017;12:e0177136. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177136.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

47. Little, VL, Perry, LA, Mercado, MWV, Kautz, SA, Patten, C Gait asymmetry pattern following stroke determines acute response to locomotor task. Gait Posture 2020;77:300–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.02.016.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

48. Ogihara, H, Tsushima, E, Kamo, T, Sato, T, Matsushima, A, Niioka, Y, et al.. Kinematic gait asymmetry assessment using joint angle data in patients with chronic stroke-A normalized cross-correlation approach. Gait Posture 2020;80:168–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.05.042.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

49. Schache, AG, Wrigley, TV, Baker, R, Pandy, MG. Biomechanical response to hamstring muscle strain injury. Gait Posture 2009;29:332–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.10.054.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

50. Carpes, FP, Mota, CB, Faria, IE. On the bilateral asymmetry during running and cycling – a review considering leg preference. Phys Ther Sport 2010;11:136–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2010.06.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2022-07-06
Accepted: 2023-05-15
Published Online: 2023-06-12
Published in Print: 2023-12-15

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmt-2022-0258/html
Scroll to top button