Startseite Region-wise severity analysis of diabetic plantar foot thermograms
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Region-wise severity analysis of diabetic plantar foot thermograms

  • Naveen Sharma , Sarfaraj Mirza , Ashu Rastogi ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Satbir Singh und Prasant K. Mahapatra
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 9. Juni 2023
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Objectives

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) can be avoided if symptoms of diabetic foot complications are detected early and treated promptly. Early detection requires regular examination, which might be limited for many reasons. To identify affected or potentially affected regions in the diabetic plantar foot, the region-wise severity of the plantar foot must be known.

Methods

A novel thermal diabetic foot dataset of 104 subjects was developed that is suitable for Indian healthcare conditions. The entire plantar foot thermogram is divided into three parts, i.e., forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot. The division of plantar foot is based on the prevalence of foot ulcers and the load on the foot. To classify the severity levels, conventional machine learning (CML) techniques like logistic regression, decision tree, KNN, SVM, random forest, etc., and convolutional neural networks (CNN), such as EfficientNetB1, VGG-16, VGG-19, AlexNet, InceptionV3, etc., were applied and compared for robust outcomes.

Results

The study successfully developed a thermal diabetic foot dataset, allowing for effective classification of diabetic foot ulcer severity using the CML and CNN techniques. The comparison of different methods revealed variations in performance, with certain approaches outperforming others.

Conclusions

The region-based severity analysis offers valuable insights for targeted interventions and preventive measures, contributing to a comprehensive assessment of diabetic foot ulcer severity. Further research and development in these techniques can enhance the detection and management of diabetic foot complications, ultimately improving patient outcomes.


Corresponding author: Dr. Ashu Rastogi, MD, DM (Endocrinology) Associate Professor, Department of Endocrinology, PGIMER , Sector 12, Chandigarh, 160012, India, Email:

Funding source: CSIR-Central Scientific Instruments Organization, Chandigarh (India) and Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh (India)

  1. Research funding: The authors acknowledge CSIR-Central Scientific Instruments Organization, Chandigarh (India) and Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh (India) for their support and encouragement in carrying out this research work.

  2. Author contributions: The contribution of each other are surmised as: Naveen Sharma (NS): Study conception and design, analysis and interpretation of results, manuscript writing/compilation; Sarfaraj Mirza (SM): Patient data collection, data design, and results, draft manuscript writing; Ashu Rastogi (AR): Medical inputs in designing protocol, review and manuscript editing; Satbir Singh(SS): Patient data collection, draft manuscript preparation, results compilation; Prasant Kumar Mahapatra (PKM): Critical review and editing.

  3. Competing interests: The authors have no competing of interest to disclose.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: The study was conducted at diabetic foot clinic of tertiary care health facility in North India. The protocol was approved (Ref. No-2020/000170) by the Research Ethics Committee of the PGIMER Chandigarh.

References

1. Bus, SA, van Netten, JJ. A shift in priority in diabetic foot care and research: 75% of foot ulcers are preventable. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2016;32:195–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.2738.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Rastogi A, Goyal G, Kesavan R, Bal A, Kumar H, Mangalanadanam, et al.. Long term outcomes after incident diabetic foot ulcer: Multicenter large cohort prospective study (EDI-FOCUS investigators) epidemiology of diabetic foot complications study: epidemiology of diabetic foot complications study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2020;162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108113.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Vilcahuaman, L, Harba, R, Canals, M, Zequera, C, Wilches, MT, Arista, L, et al.. Automatic analysis of plantar foot thermal images in at-risk type II diabetes by using an infrared camera. In: World congress on medical physics and biomedical engineering. Toronto, Canada: Springer International Publishing; 2015:228–31 pp.10.1007/978-3-319-19387-8_55Suche in Google Scholar

4. Guzaitis, J, Kadusauskiene, A, Raisutis, R. Algorithm for automated foot detection in thermal and optical images for temperature asymmetry analysis. Electronics 2021;10:571. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10050571.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Ring, EFJ, Ammer, K. The technique of infrared imaging in medicine. Thermol Int 2000;10:7–14.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Hernández-Contreras, DH, Peregrina-Barreto, J, Rangel-Magdaleno, F, Orihuela-Espina, J, Ramirez-Cortes. Measuring changes in the plantar temperature distribution in diabetic patients. In: 2017 IEEE international instrumentation and measurement technol-ogy conference (I2MTC); 2017:1–6 pp.10.1109/I2MTC.2017.7969699Suche in Google Scholar

7. Iversen, MM, Tell, GS, Riise, T, Berit, R, Hanestad, T, Graue, M, et al.. History of foot ulcer increases mortality among individuals with diabetes: ten-year follow-up of the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study, Norway. Diabetes Care 2009;32:2193–9. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-0651.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Chan, A, Wah, IA, Macfarlane, DR, Bowsher. Contact thermography of painful diabetic neuropathic foot. Diabetes Care 1991;14:918–22. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.14.10.918.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Nagase, T, Sanada, H, Takehara, K, Oe, M, Iizaka, S, Ohashi, Y, et al.. Variations of plan-tar thermographic patterns in normal controls and non-ulcer diabetic patients: novel classification using angiosome concept. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 2011;64:860–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2010.12.003.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Mori, T, Nagase, T, Takehara, K, Oe, M, Ohashi, Y, Amemiya, A, et al.. Morphological pattern classification system for plantar thermography of patients with diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2013;7:1102–12.10.1177/193229681300700502Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Armstrong, DG, Holtz-Neiderer, K, Wendel, C, Mohler, MJ, Kimbriel, HR, Lavery, LA. Skin temperature monitoring reduces the risk for diabetic foot ulceration in high-risk patients. Am J Med 2007;120:1042–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.06.028.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Bagavathiappan, S, Philip, J, Jayakumar, T, Raj, B, Someshwar, PN, Rao, M, et al.. Correlation between plantar foot temperature and diabetic neuropathy: a case study by using an infrared thermal imaging technique. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010;4:1386–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/193229681000400613.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Taylor, G, Ian, RJ, Corlett, SC, Dhar, MW, Ashton. The anatomical (angiosome) and clinical territories of cutaneous perforating arteries: development of the concept and designing safe flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:1447–59. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e318208d21b.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Peregrina-Barreto, H, Morales-Hernandez, LA, Rangel-Magdaleno, JJ, Avina-Cervantes, JG, Ramirez-Cortes, JM, Morales-Caporal, R. Quantitative estimation of temperature variations in plantar angiosomes: a study case for diabetic foot. Comput Math Methods Med 2014;2014:10. 585306. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/585306.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Hernandez-Contreras, D, Alejandro, H, Peregrina-Barreto, J, De, J, Rangel-Magdaleno, FJRC. Plantar thermogram database for the study of diabetic foot complications. IEEE Access 2019;7:161296–307. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2951356.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Kamavisdar, P, Saluja, SS. A survey on image classification approaches and techniques. Int J Adv Res Comput Commun Eng 2013;2:1005–9.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Ren, J. ANN vs. SVM: which one performs better in classification of MCCs in mammogram imaging. Knowl Base Syst 2012;26:144–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2011.07.016.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Sethi, H, Goraya, A, Sharma, V. Artificial intelligence based ensemble model for diagnosis of diabetes. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci 2017;8:1540–8.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Goyal, MND, Reeves, AK, Davison, S, Rajbhandari, J, Spragg, MH, Yap, MH. Dfunet: convolutional neural networks for diabetic foot ulcer classification. IEEE Trans Emerg Topics Comput Intell 2018;4:728–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/tetci.2018.2866254.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Goyal, M, Hassanpour, S. A refined deep learning architecture for diabetic foot ulcers detection; 2020. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.07922.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Liu, C, Heijden, FVD, Klein, ME, Baal, JGV, Bus, SA, Netten, JJV, et al.. Infrared dermal thermography on diabetic feet soles to predict ulcerations: a case study. In: Advanced biomedical and clinical diagnostic systems XI. SPIE; 2013, vol. 8572:102–10 pp.10.1117/12.2001807Suche in Google Scholar

22. Villa, E, Arteaga-Marrero, N, Ruiz-Alzola, J. Performance assessment of low-cost thermal cameras for medical applications. Sensors 2020;20:1321. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20051321.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Haralick, RM, Shanmugam, K, Dinstein, IH. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1973;6:610–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.1973.4309314.Suche in Google Scholar

24. Soh, LK, Tsatsoulis, C. Texture analysis of SAR sea ice imagery using gray level co-occurrence matrices. IEEE Trans Geosci Rem Sens 1999;37:780–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.752194.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Sasikala, M, Kumaravel, N. A wavelet-based optimal texture feature set for classification of brain tumours. J Med Eng Technol 2008;32:198–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/03091900701455524.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Khandakar, A, Muhammad, EH, Chowdhury, M, Reaz, SBI, Md, H, Ali, MA, et al.. A ma-chine learning model for early detection of diabetic foot using thermogram images. Comput Biol Med 2021;137:104838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104838.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Saminathan, J, Sasikala, M, Narayanamurthy, VB, Rajesh, K, Arvind, RJIP. Computer aided detection of diabetic foot ulcer using asymmetry analysis of texture and temperature features. Infrared Phys Technol 2020;105:103219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2020.103219.Suche in Google Scholar

28. Cruz-Vega, Israel, D, Hernandez-Contreras, H, Peregrina-Barreto, J, De, J, Rangel-Magdaleno, JM, et al.. Deep learning classification for diabetic foot thermograms. Sensors 2020;20:1762. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20061762.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Hernandez-Contreras, D, Peregrina-Barreto, H, Rangel-Magdaleno, J, Gonzalez-Bernal, JA, Altamirano-Robles, L. A quantitative index for classification of plantar thermal changes in the diabetic foot. Infrared Phys Technol 2017;81:242–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2017.01.010.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-09-19
Accepted: 2023-05-15
Published Online: 2023-06-09
Published in Print: 2023-12-15

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 25.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmt-2022-0376/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen