Home Non-invasive determination of respiratory effort in spontaneous breathing and support ventilation: a validation study with healthy volunteers
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Non-invasive determination of respiratory effort in spontaneous breathing and support ventilation: a validation study with healthy volunteers

  • Kristel Lopez-Navas EMAIL logo , Sebastian Brandt , Merle Strutz , Hartmut Gehring and Ullrich Wenkebach
Published/Copyright: March 7, 2014

Abstract

The proper setting of support ventilation aims to follow the patients’ demands, ensuring adequate assistance to their respiratory effort. Effort assessment is thus necessary. But invasive procedures like measuring transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) are impractical in long-term ventilation. Our purpose was therefore the development of the Occlusion+Delta (O+D) method for non-invasive continuous assessment of effort, quantified by the inspiratory pressure-time-product (PTPinsp), during ventilatory support. Flow and airway pressure were measured from 25 healthy volunteers at three effort levels. For the non-invasive method, short expiratory occlusions were executed each three to seven cycles to estimate resistance and compliance with a fitting algorithm fed with the differences between occluded and undisturbed cycles. Signals and estimates were then used to calculate the effort. For the validation of O+D, its estimations were compared to the results from invasive measurement of Pdi using balloon catheters. The agreement between PTPinsp from the invasive measurement and the proposed alternative was confirmed by regression analysis (PTPO+D=1.13PTPPdi- 0.85, R²=0.84) and calculation of their differences (mean±SD=1.78±7.18 cm H2O s). Repeated execution of the non-invasive O+D method facilitates a safe automatic assessment of respiratory mechanics and breathing effort, promoting the rapid recognition of changes in patient’s demands and the adaptation of support.


Corresponding author: Kristel Lopez-Navas, Laboratory of Medical Systems, Lübeck University of Applied Sciences, Mönkhofer Weg 239 Geb. 64 Raum 3.27, 23562 Lübeck, Germany, Phone: 0049 451 3005501, Fax: 0049 451 3005476, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of the European Union and the State Schleswig-Holstein. Program for the Future-Economy: 122-09-024.

References

[1] Benditt JO. Esophageal and gastric pressure measurements. Respir Care 2005; 50: 68–75; discussion 75–77.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bland JM, Altman DG. The use of transformation when comparing two means. Br Med J 1996; 312: 1153.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Esteban A, Ferguson ND, Meade MO, et al. Evolution of mechanical ventilation in response to clinical research. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 177: 170–177.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Iotti GA, Braschi A, Brunner JX, et al. Respiratory mechanics by least squares fitting in mechanically ventilated patients: applications during paralysis and during pressure support ventilation. Intensive Care Med 1995; 21: 406–413.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Lopez-Navas K, Brandt S, Strutz M, Gehring H, Wenkebach U. Comparison of two methods to assess transdiaphragmatic pressure at different levels of work of breathing. Biomed Tech 2012; 57(S1): 937–940.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Moerer O. Effort-adapted modes of assisted breathing. Curr Opin Crit Care 2012; 18: 61–69.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Navajas D, Alcaraz J, Peslin R, Roca J, Farré R. Evaluation of a method for assessing respiratory mechanics during noninvasive ventilation. Eur Respir J 2000; 16: 704–709.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Passam F, Hoing S, Prinianakis G, Siafakas N, Milic-Emili J, Georgopoulos D. Effect of different levels of pressure support and proportional assist ventilation on breathing pattern, work of breathing and gas exchange in mechanically ventilated hypercapnic COPD patients with acute respiratory failure. Respiration 2003; 70: 355–361.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Pesenti A, Pelosi P, Foti G, D’Andrea L, Rossi N. An interrupter technique for measuring respiratory mechanics and the pressure generated by respiratory muscles during partial ventilatory support. Chest 1992; 102: 918–923.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Peslin R, da Silva JF, Chabot F, Duvivier C. Respiratory mechanics studied by multiple linear regression in unsedated ventilated patients. Eur Respir J 1992; 5: 871–878.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Putensen C, Hering R, Muders T, Wrigge H. Assisted breathing is better in acute respiratory failure. Curr Opin Crit Care 2005; 11: 63–68.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Putensen C, Zech S, Wrigge H, et al. Long-term effects of spontaneous breathing during ventilatory support in patients with acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 164: 43–49.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Sassoon CSH. Assist-control mechanical ventilation attenuates ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004; 170: 626–632.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Wysocki M, Cracco C, Teixeira A, et al. Reduced breathing variability as a predictor of unsuccessful patient separation from mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 2076–2083.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Younes M. Proportional assist ventilation, a new approach to ventilatory support. Theory Am Rev Respir Dis 1992; 145: 114–120.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Younes M, Kun J, Masiowski B, Webster K, Roberts D. A method for noninvasive determination of inspiratory resistance during proportional assist ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163: 829–839.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Younes M, Webster K, Kun J, Roberts D, Masiowski B. A method for measuring passive elastance during proportional assist ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 164: 50–60.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2013-5-26
Accepted: 2014-2-10
Published Online: 2014-3-7
Published in Print: 2014-8-1

©2014 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 28.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmt-2013-0057/html
Scroll to top button