Review of machine learning and signal processing techniques for automated electrode selection in high-density microelectrode arrays

References

[1] Abeles M, Goldstein MH. Multispike train analysis. Proc IEEE 1977; 65: 762–773.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Bestel R, Daus AW, Thielemann C. A novel automated spike sorting algorithm with adaptable feature extraction. J Neurosci Meth 2012; 211: 168–178.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Bhumbra GS, Dyball REJ. Measuring spike coding in the rat supraoptic nucleus. J Physiol 2004; 555: 281–296.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Biffi E, Ghezzi D, Pedrocchi A, Ferrigno G. Development and validation of a spike detection and classification algorithm aimed at implementation on hardware devices. Comput Intell Neurosci 2010; 2010: 659050 (15 pp).Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Brown EN, Kass RE, Mitra PP. Multiple neural spike train data analysis: state-of-the-art and future challenges. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7: 456–461.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Brychta RJ, Tuntrakool S, Appalsamy M, et al. Wavelet methods for spike detection in mouse renal sympathetic nerve activity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007; 54: 82–93.Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Buzsáki G. Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7: 446–451.Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Calvin WH. Some simple spike separation techniques for simultaneously recorded neurons. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1973; 34: 94–96.Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Camp C, Pinsker H. Computer separation of unitary spikes from whole-nerve recordings. Brain Res 1979; 169: 455–479.Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Cham JG, Branchaud EA, Nenadic Z, et al. Semi-chronic motorized microdrive and control algorithm for autonomously isolating and maintaining optimal extracellular action potentials. J Neurophysiol 2005; 93: 570–579.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Chan HL, Wu T, Lee S-T, Fang S-C, Chao P-K, Lin MA. Classification of neuronal spikes over the reconstructed phase space. J Neurosci Meth 2008; 168: 203–211.Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Chestek CA, Gilja V, Nuyujukian P, et al. Long-term stability of neural prosthetic control signals from silicon cortical arrays in rhesus macaque motor cortex. J Neural Eng 2011; 8: 045005 (11pp).Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Choi JH, Kim T. Neural action potential detector using multi-resolution TEO. Electr Lett 2002; 38: 541–543.Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Choi JH, Jung HK, Kim T. A new action potential detector using MTEO and its effects on spike sorting systems at low signal-to-noise ratios. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2006; 53: 738–746.Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Csicsvari J, Hirase H, Czurko A, Buzsaki G. Reliability and state dependence of pyramidal cell-interneuron synapses in the hippocampus: an ensemble approach in the behaving rat. Neuron 1998; 21: 179–189.Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Davies RM, Gerstein GL, Baker SN. Measurement of time-dependent changes in the irregularity of neural spiking. J Neurophysiol 2006; 96: 906–918.Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Delescluse M, Pouzat C. Efficient spike-sorting of multi-state neurons using inter-spike intervals information. J Neurosci Meth 2006; 150: 16–29.Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG. Pattern classification. 2nded. New York: John Wiley & Sons 2001.Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen J, Maier J, Schubert D, et al. CocoDat: a database system for organizing and selecting quantitative data on single neurons and neuronal micro circuitry. J Neurosci Meth 2005; 141: 291–308.Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Einevoll GT, Franke F, Hagen E, Pouzat C, Harris KD. Towards reliable spike-train recordings from thousands of neurons with multielectrodes. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2012; 22: 11–17.Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Fee MS, Leonardo A. Miniature motorized microdrive and commutator system for chronic neural recording in small animals. J Neurosci Methods 2001; 112: 83–94.Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Fee MS, Mitra PP, Kleinfeld D. Automatic sorting of multiple-unit neuronal signals in the presence of anisotropic and non-gaussian variability. J. Neurosci Meth 1996; 69: 175–188.Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Gerstein GL, Bloom MJ, Espinosa IE, Evanczuk S, Turner MR. Design of a laboratory for multineuron studies. IEEE Trans Systems, Man Cybern 1983; 13: 668–676.Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Gibson S, Judy JW, Markovic D. Comparison of spike-sorting algorithms for future hardware implementation. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE EMBS), Vancouver, Canada, August 20–24, 2008. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE 2008: 5015–5020.Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Girolami M, Rogers S. Variational Bayesian multinomial probit regression with Gaussian process priors. Neural Computation 2006; 18: 1790–1817.Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Glaser EM, Marks WB. On-line separation of interleaved neuronal pulse sequences. Data Acquisition Process Biol Med 1966; 5: 137–156.Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Grand L, Wittner L, Herwik S, et al. Short and long term biocompatibility of NeuroProbes silicon probes. J Neurosci Methods 2010; 189: 216–229.Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Hahnloser RHR, Kozhevnikov AA, Fee MS. An ultra-sparse code underlies the generation of neural sequences in a songbird. Nature 2002; 419: 65–70.Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Harris KD. Accuracy of tetrode spike separation as determined by simultaneous intracellular and extracellular measurements. J Neurophysiol 2000; 84: 401–414.Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Heine SA, Highstein SM, Blazquez PM. Golgi cells operate as state-specific temporal filters at the input stage of the cerebellar cortex. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 17004–17014.Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Holt GR, Softky WR, Koch C, Douglas RJ. Comparison of discharge variability in vitro and in vivo in cat visual cortex neurons. J Neurophysiol 1996; 75: 1806–1814.Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Holtzman T, Rajapaksa T, Mostofi A, Edgley SA. Different responses of rat cerebellar Purkinje cells and Golgi cells evoked by widespread convergent sensory inputs. J Physiol 2006; 574 (Pt 2): 491–507.Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Horton PM, Nicol AU, Kendrick KM, Feng JF. Spike sorting based upon machine learning algorithms (SOMA). J Neurosci Meth 2007; 160: 52–68.Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Hulata E, Segev R, Ben-Jacob E. A method for spike sorting and detection based on wavelet packets and Shannon’s mutual information. J Neurosci Meth 2002; 117: 1–12.Suche in Google Scholar

[35] Hunter JD, Milton G, Thomas PJ, Cowan JD. Resonance effect for neural spike time reliability. J Neurophysiol 1998; 80: 1427–1438.Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Jackson N, Sridharan A, Anand S. Long-term neural recordings using MEMS based movable microelectrodes in the brain. Front Neuroeng 2010; 3: 1–10.Suche in Google Scholar

[37] Kim KH, Kim SJ. Neural spike sorting under nearly 0-dB signal-to-noise ratio using nonlinear energy operator and artificial neural network classifier. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2000; 47: 1406–1411.Suche in Google Scholar

[38] Kim KH, Kim SJ. Method for unsupervised classification of multi-unit neural signal recording under low signal-to-noise ratio. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003; 50: 421–431.Suche in Google Scholar

[39] Kreuz T, Haas JS, Morelli A, Abarbanel HDI, Polit A., Measuring spike train synchrony. J Neurosci Methods 2007; 165: 151–161.Suche in Google Scholar

[40] Krippendorff K. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. 2nd ed. California: Sage Publications Inc. 2004.Suche in Google Scholar

[41] Letelier JC, Weber PP. Spike sorting based on discrete wavelet transform coefficients. J Neurosci Methods 2000; 101: 93–106.Suche in Google Scholar

[42] Lewicki MS. A review of methods for spike sorting: the detection and classification of neural action potentials. Network: Comput Neural Syst 1998; 9: R53–R78.Suche in Google Scholar

[43] Liu X, Tonegawa S. Optogenetics 3.0. Cell 2010; 141: 22–24.Suche in Google Scholar

[44] Miller DJ, Raghuram J, Kesidis G, Collins, CM. Improved generative semisupervised learning based on finely grained component-conditional class labelling. Neural Comput 2012; 24: 1926–1966.Suche in Google Scholar

[45] Miura K, Okada M, Amari S-I. Estimating spiking irregularities under changing environments. Neural Comput 2006; 18: 2359–2386.Suche in Google Scholar

[46] Mukhopahdyay S, Ray GC. A new interpretation of nonlinear energy operator and its efficacy in spike detection. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1998; 45: 180–187.Suche in Google Scholar

[47] Nenadic Z, Burdick JW. Spike detection using the continuous wavelet transform. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005; 52: 74–87.Suche in Google Scholar

[48] Nenadic Z, Burdick JW. A control algorithm for autonomous optimization of extracellular recordings. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2006; 53: 941–955.Suche in Google Scholar

[49] Neves HP, Orban GA, Koudelka-Hep M, Ruther P. Development of multifunctional probe arrays for cerebral applications. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, Kohala Coast, HI, USA, 2–5 May, 2007. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE 2007: 104–109.Suche in Google Scholar

[50] Neves HP, Torfs T, Yazicioglu RF, et al. The NeuroProbes project: a concept for electronic depth control. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE EMBS), Vancouver, Canada, August 20–24, 2008. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE 2008: 1857.Suche in Google Scholar

[51] Paraskevopoulou SE, Barsakcioglu DE, Saberi MR, Eftekhar A, Constandinou TG. Feature extraction using first and second derivative extrema (FSDE), for real time and hardware-efficient spike sorting. J Neurosci Methods 2013; 215: 29–37.Suche in Google Scholar

[52] Pastrana E. Optogenetcs: controlling cell function with light. Nat Methods 2011; 8: 24–25.Suche in Google Scholar

[53] Pine J. A history of MEA development. In: Taketani M, Baudry M, editors. Advances in network electrophysiology: using multi-electrode Arrays. New York: Springer 2006: 3–23.Suche in Google Scholar

[54] Pouzat C. Technique(s) for spike-sorting. In: Dalibard J, editor. Methods and models in neurophysics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2005: 729–786.Suche in Google Scholar

[55] Pouzat C, Delescluse M, Viot P, Diebolt J. Improved spike-sorting by modeling firing statistics and burst-dependent spike amplitude attenuation: a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. J Neurophysiol 2004; 91: 2910–2928.Suche in Google Scholar

[56] Quian Quiroga R. What is the real shape of extracellular spikes. J Neurosci Meth 2009; 177: 194–198.Suche in Google Scholar

[57] Quian Quiroga R, Nadasdy Z, Ben-Shaul Y. Unsupervised spike sorting with wavelets and superparamagnetic clustering. Neural Comput 2004; 16: 1661–1687.Suche in Google Scholar

[58] Rancz EA, Ishikawa T, Duguid I, et al. High-fidelity transmission of sensory information by single cerebellar mossy fibre boutons. Nature 2007; 450: 1245–1248.Suche in Google Scholar

[59] Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI. Gaussian processes for machine learning. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press 2006.Suche in Google Scholar

[60] Ruigrok TJH, Hensbroek RA, Simpson JI. Spontaneous activity signatures of morphologically identified interneurons in the vestibulocerebellum. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 712–724.Suche in Google Scholar

[61] Ruther P, Aarts AAA, Frey O, Herwik S. The NeuroProbes project – multifunctional probe arrays for neural recording and stimulation. Biomed Technol 2008; 53: 238–240.Suche in Google Scholar

[62] Ruther P, Herwik S, Kisban S, Seidl K, Paul O. Recent progress in neural probes using silicon MEMS technology. IEEJ Trans Electr Electron Eng 2010; 5: 505–515.Suche in Google Scholar

[63] Sato T, Suzukia T, Mabuchi K. A new multi-electrode array design for chronic neural recording, with independent and automatic hydraulic positioning. J Neurosci Methods 2007; 160: 45–51.Suche in Google Scholar

[64] Schreiber S, Fellous JM, Whitmer JH, Tiesinga PHE, Sejnowski TJ. A new correlation-based measure of spike timing reliability. Neurocomputing 2003; 52–54: 925–931.Suche in Google Scholar

[65] Schubert D, Staiger JF, Cho N, Kötter R, Zilles K, Luhmann HJ. Layer-specific intracolumnar and transcolumnar functional connectivity of layer 5 pyramidal cells in rat barrel cortex. J Neurosci 2001; 21: 3580–3592.Suche in Google Scholar

[66] Seidl K, Herwik S, Nurcahyo Y, et al. CMOS-based high-density silicon microprobe array for electronic depth control in neural recording. In: Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), Pisa, Italy, January 25–29, 2009. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE 2009: 232–235.Suche in Google Scholar

[67] Seidl K, Torfs T, De Mazière PA, et al. Control and data acquisition software for high-density CMOS-based microprobe arrays implementing electronic depth control. Biomed Technol 2010; 55: 183–191.Suche in Google Scholar

[68] Shinomoto S, Miura K, Koyama S. A measure of local variation of inter-spike intervals. BioSystems 2005; 79(1–3): 67–72.Suche in Google Scholar

[69] Shinomoto S, Shima K, Tanji J. Differences in spiking patterns among cortical neurons. Neural Comput 2003; 15: 2823–2842.Suche in Google Scholar

[70] Shoham S, Fellows MR, Normann RA. Robust, automatic spike sorting using mixtures of multivariate t-distributions. J Neurosci Meth 2003; 127: 111–122.Suche in Google Scholar

[71] Simon W. The real-time sorting of neuro-electric action potentials in multiple unit studies. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1965; 18:192–195.Suche in Google Scholar

[72] Swartz A. Cortical neural prosthetics. Ann Rev Neurosci 2004; 27: 487–507.Suche in Google Scholar

[73] Takegawa T, Isomura Y, Fukai T. Accurate spike sorting for multi-unit recordings. Eur J Neurosci 2010; 31: 263–272.Suche in Google Scholar

[74] Thelin J, Jörntell H, Psouni E, et al. Implant size and fixation mode strongly influence tissue reactions in the CNS. PLoS One 2011; 6: e16267 (10 pp).Suche in Google Scholar

[75] Torfs T, Aarts AAA, Erismis MA, et al. Two-dimensional multi-channel neural probes with electronic depth control. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst 2011; 5: 403–412.Suche in Google Scholar

[76] Traver L, Tarin C, Marti P, Cardona N. Adaptive-threshold neural spike detection by noise-envelope tracking. Electr Lett 2007; 43: 1333–1335.Suche in Google Scholar

[77] Turner JN, Shain W, Szarowski DH, et al. Cerebral astrocyte response to micromachined silicon implants. Exp Neurol 1999; 155: 33–49.Suche in Google Scholar

[78] Van Dijck G, Jezzini A, Herwik S, et al. Toward automated electrode selection in the electronic depth control strategy for multi-unit recordings. In: Wong KW, Mendis BSU, Bouzerdoum A, editors. Lecture notes in Computer Science 6444, Neural information processing. Models and applications Part II. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer 2010: 17–25.Suche in Google Scholar

[79] Van Dijck G, Seidl K, Paul O, Ruther P, Van Hulle MM, Maex R. Enhancing the yield of high-density electrode arrays through automated electrode selection. Int J Neural Syst 2012; 22: 1–19.Suche in Google Scholar

[80] Van Dijck G, Van Hulle MM, Heiney SA, et al. Probabilistic identification of cerebellar cortical neurones across species. PLoS One 2013; 8: e57669 (13 pp).Suche in Google Scholar

[81] van Rossum MCW. A novel spike distance. Neural Comput 2001; 13: 751–763.Suche in Google Scholar

[82] Vargas-Irwin C, Donoghue JP. Automated spike sorting using density grid contour clustering and subtractive waveform decomposition. J Neurosci Meth 2007; 164: 1–18.Suche in Google Scholar

[83] Wang GL, Zhou Y, Chen AH, Zhang PM, Liang PJ. A robust method for spike sorting with automatic overlap decomposition. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2006; 53: 1195–1198.Suche in Google Scholar

[84] Wild J, Prekopcsak Z, Sieger T, Novak D, Jech R. Performance comparison of extracellular spike sorting algorithms for single-channel recordings. J Neurosci Methods 2012; 203: 369–376.Suche in Google Scholar

[85] Winslow BD, Tresco PA. Quantitative analysis of the tissue response to chronically implanted microwire electrodes in rat cortex. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 1558–1567.Suche in Google Scholar

[86] Wood F, Fellows M, Donoghue JP, Black MJ. Automatic spike sorting for neural decoding. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE EMBS), San Francisco, California, USA September 1–5, 2004. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE 2004: 4009–4012.Suche in Google Scholar

[87] Yang X, Shamma S. A totally automated system for the detection and classification of neural spikes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1998; 35: 806–816.Suche in Google Scholar

[88] Yang Z, Zhao Q, Wental L. Improving spike separation using waveform derivatives. J Neural Eng 2009; 6: 046006 (12 pp).Suche in Google Scholar

[89] Zhang P, Wu J, Zhou Y, Liang P, Yuan J. Spike sorting based on automatic template reconstruction with a partial solution to the overlapping problem. J Neurosci Methods 2004; 135: 55–65.Suche in Google Scholar

[90] Zouridakis G, Tam DC. Identification of reliable spike templates in multi-unit extracellular recordings using fuzzy clustering. Comput Meth Programs Biomed 2000; 61: 91–98.Suche in Google Scholar

[91] Zviagintsev, Perelman Y, Ginosar R. Low-power architectures for spike sorting. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, Arlington, Virginia, March 16–19, 2005. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE 2005: 162–165.Suche in Google Scholar