Home Friedrich Nietzsche and René Wellek’s Concept of Literary History (Neo-Idealistic Acceptance among Slavonic Literatures)
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Friedrich Nietzsche and René Wellek’s Concept of Literary History (Neo-Idealistic Acceptance among Slavonic Literatures)

  • Miloš Zelenka EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 5, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The study highlights the conjunction of Friedrich Nietzsche and the theory of literary history in Slavonic literatures which both in the early twentieth century and in the inter-war period stood neglected within the Central European context. Through German humanities, many literary historians (M. M. Bachtin, W. Dilthey, J. Kleiner, Z. Łempicki, V. M. Zhirmunsky, etc.) whose works philosophically drew on the stream of differentiated Neo-Idealistic aesthetics were affected by a radically scathing critical approach to historicism and naturalistic scientism. A secure rank among these was occupied by the American structuralist of Czech origin René Wellek (1903–1995) as a member of the Prague Linguistic Circle and the founding father of New Criticism. This was apparent, for example, in accentuating the meaningful ‘energy’ of literary texts and in appreciating literary originality so as to manifest an intuitive intellect. Further, it is reflected in using ‘regulative’ concepts which (regardless of their fictional character) constitute our ‘rational’ knowledge while bringing forth Nietzsche’s notion of ‘perspectivism’ as an evaluative approach to the surveyed object that can be interpreted from various perspectives without failing to remain an objectively existing phenomenological ‘entity’. Wellek was right to regard Nietzsche’s postulate of the integrality of a literary work, along with Dilthey’s structurally ‘sympathetic’ psychology and Husserl’s phenomenological antipsychologism, as the main impetus for the application of philosophical structuralism to the area of poetics. Such a transformation was facilitated by a specific concept of structure understood as a holistic complex of ‘meanings’ determined by mutual relations of its individual parts. We presume that the analysis of the philosophical roots of Wellek’s literary research, later aspiring to the study of systems and supranational literary wholes, repels the traditionally accepted idea of a forced caesura between psychological and structural-technological approaches as they were canonised in the 1930s’ structural aesthetics.

Works Cited

Aucouturier, Michel. Le formalisme russe. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1985.Search in Google Scholar

Bachtin, Michail Michajlovič. Estetika slovesnej tvorby. Trans. Viera Šabíková. Bratislava: Tatran, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

Behler, Ernest. Derrida – Nietzsche, Nietzsche – Derrida. Schöning: Brill Schoningh, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

Bertram, Ernst. Nietzsche. Versuch einer Mythologie. Berlin: Georg Bondi, 1929.Search in Google Scholar

Borský, Lev. Bedřich Nietzsche – vývoj jeho filosofie. Prague: Antonín Hajn, 1912.Search in Google Scholar

Bucco, Martin. René Wellek, Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1981.Search in Google Scholar

Creed, Walter G. “René Wellek and Karl Popper on the Mode of Existence of Ideas in Literature and Science.” Journal of the History of Ideas in Literature and Science 44.4 (1983): 639–56.10.2307/2709220Search in Google Scholar

Czaplejewicz, Eugeniusz. “Między formalizmem a neoidealizmem (wokól myślenia totalitarnego w teorii literatury).” Przegląd Humanistyczny 35.5–6 (1991): 45–60.Search in Google Scholar

Demetz, Peter, Thomas Greene, and Lowry Nelson, eds. The Disciplines of Criticism: Essays in Literary Theory, Interpretation, and History. Essays in Honor of René Wellek on His 65th Birthday. New Haven, CT: Yale UP, 1968. Search in Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. Texty k dekonstrukci. Trans. Miroslav Petříček. Bratislava: Archa, 1993. 177–95.Search in Google Scholar

Empson, William. Seven Types of Ambiguity. New York, NY: New Directions, 1930.Search in Google Scholar

Eucken, Rudolf. Die Einheit des Geisteslebens in Bewusstsein und That der Menscheit. Leipzig: Veit, 1888.Search in Google Scholar

Fietz, Lothar. “René Welleks Literaturtheorie und der Prager Strukturalismus.” Englische und amerikanische Literaturtheorie. Vol. 2. Eds. Ahrens Rüdiger and Erwin Wolff. Heidelberg: Winter Verlag, 1978–1979. 504–20.Search in Google Scholar

Fink, Eugen. Nietzsches Philosophie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1960. Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Otokar. Duše a slovo. Prague: Melantrich, 1929.Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Otokar. Friedrich Nietzsche. Literární studie. Prague: J. Otto, 1913.Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Otokar. “K překladu Zarathustry.” Přehled 12.18 (1913–1914): 315; and 12.19 (1913–1914): 326–7.Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Otokar. “Nové směry v literární vědě.” Časopis pro moderní filologii 20.1 (1934); 43–53; 20.2 (1934): 139–52; and 20.3–4 (1934): 283–93.Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Otokar. Otázky literární psychologie. Prague: F. Topič, 1917.Search in Google Scholar

Gillespie, Gerald. “René Wellek Celebrates His Eighth Decade.” Revue de Littérature Comparée 57.4 (1983): 523–29.Search in Google Scholar

Gundolph, Friedrich. Goethe. Berlin: Georg Bondi, 1916.Search in Google Scholar

Hansen-Löve, Aage. Der russische formalismus. Methodologische Rekonstruktion seiner Entwicklung aus dem Prinzip der Verfremdung. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1978. Search in Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. Nietzsche 1–2. Stuttgart: Verlag Günther Neske, 1961.Search in Google Scholar

Holthusen, H. E. “System und Geschichte der kritischen Intelligenz: René Welleks Beiträge zur Literaturwissenschaft.” Kritisches Verstehen. Munich: Piper, 1961. 197–215.Search in Google Scholar

Hubík, Stanislav. “Friedrich Nietzsche – předjezdec postmodernismu?” Nietzsche a súčasnosť. Ed. Jana Sošková. Prešov: Prešovská univerzita, 1994. 54–64.Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman, and J. N. Tyňanov. “Problemy izučenija literatury i jazyka.” Novyj Lef 2.12 (1928): 35–7.Search in Google Scholar

Lawall, Sarah. “René Wellek: Phenomenological Literary Historian.” Literary Theory and Criticism, Part I. Ed. Joseph Strelka. Bern, Frankfurt, and New York, NY: Peter Lang, 1984. 393–416.Search in Google Scholar

Łempicki, Zygmunt. Renesans, oświecenie, romantyzm. Warsaw: Książnica Polska, 1923.Search in Google Scholar

Łempicki, Zygmunt. “Wilhelm Dilthey.” Przegląd Filozoficzny 17 (1914): 84–143.Search in Google Scholar

Lovejoy, Arthur Oncken. “The Historiography of Ideas.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 78.4 (1938): 529–43.Search in Google Scholar

Lynn, Steven. “René Wellek.” Modern American Critics 1920–1955. Ed. S. J. Gregory. Detroit, MI: Gale Research Co., 1988. 290–303.Search in Google Scholar

Markiewicz, Henryk, ed. Pojęcia i problémy nauki o literaturze. Warsaw: Państwowy Institut Wydawniczy, 1979.Search in Google Scholar

Měšťan, Antonín. “René Wellek a dědictví české a polské moderny.” Slavia 65.1–2 (1996): 163–6.Search in Google Scholar

Mitosek, Zofia. Teorie badań literackich. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

Mukařovský, Jan. Kapitoly z české poetiky. Díl II. K vývoji české poesie a prózy. Prague: Svoboda, 1948.Search in Google Scholar

Mukařovský, Jan. “Otokar Zich: Estetika dramatického umění.” Časopis pro moderní filologii 19.1 (1932–1933): 318–26.Search in Google Scholar

Mukařovský, Jan, ed. Torso a tajemství Máchova díla. Prague: František Borový, 1938.Search in Google Scholar

Novák, Arne. Kritika literární. Prague: F. Topič, 1917.Search in Google Scholar

Novák, Arne. Přehledné dějiny literatury české. Olomouc: R. Promberger, 1936–1939.Search in Google Scholar

Pospíšil, Ivo, and Miloš Zelenka. René Wellek a meziválečné Československo. Ke kořenům strukturální estetiky. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

Richards, Ivor Amstrong. Practical Criticism. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1929.Search in Google Scholar

Richards, Ivor Amstrong. Principles of Literary Criticism.New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1928.Search in Google Scholar

Schwanauer, Franz. Die Literaturtheorie Friedrich Nietzsches. Stuttgart: Die Reprografie, K. Mayer, 1963.Search in Google Scholar

Skwarczyńska, Stefania. Kierunki w badaniach literackich. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1984. Search in Google Scholar

Strelka, Joseph, ed. Literary Theory and Criticism. Festschrift Presented to René Wellek in Honor of His Eightieth Birthday. Part I: Theory, Part II: Criticism. Bern, Frankfurt, and New York, NY: Peter Lang Verlag, 1984.Search in Google Scholar

Unger, Rudolf. Literaturgeschichte als Problemgeschichte. Zur Frage geisteshistorischer Synthese, mit besonderer Beziehung auf Wilhelm Dilthey. Berlin: Deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft für Politik und Geschichte m. b. H. in Berlin w 8, 1924.Search in Google Scholar

Vaihinger, Hans. Die Philosophie als Ob. Leipzig: Verlag von Felix Meiner, 1920.Search in Google Scholar

Wehrli, Max. Základy modernej teorie literatúry. Trans. Vincent Šabík. Bratislava: Slovenské vydavateľstvo krásnej literatúry, 1965.Search in Google Scholar

Wellek, René. The Attack on Literature. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1982.Search in Google Scholar

Wellek, René. “Cambridgská skupina literárních teoretiků.” Slovo a slovesnost 3.2 (1937): 108–21.Search in Google Scholar

Wellek, René. Concepts of Criticism. Connecticut, CT: Yale UP, 1963.Search in Google Scholar

Wellek, René. “‘Dějiny českého verše’ a metody literární historie.” Listy pro umění a kritiku 2.19–20 (1934): 437–42.Search in Google Scholar

Wellek, René. “Evaluation in Literary Criticism. Theory and Practice.” Proceedings of the Xth Congress of the International Comparative Literature Association. Actes du Xe Congrés de l´Association Internationale de Littérature Comparée, 1. t. New York, NY: Garland Publishers 1985. 396.Search in Google Scholar

Wellek, René. A History of Modern Criticism 1750–1950. I-VIII. New Haven, CT: Yale UP, 1955–1992.Search in Google Scholar

Wellek, René. Immanuel Kant in England, 1793–1838. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1931.Search in Google Scholar

Wellek, René. The Literary and Aesthetics of The Prague School. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1969.Search in Google Scholar

Wellek, René. “Novější literatura o Byronovi.” Časopis pro moderní filologii, 11.1 (1924): 240–1.Search in Google Scholar

Wellek, René. “Osobnost Shelleyova v novější literature.“ Časopis pro moderní filologii 12.1 (1926): 255–61.Search in Google Scholar

Wellek, René “Otokar Fischer jako literární historik.” Dnešek 1.1 (1930): 9.Search in Google Scholar

Wellek, René. “Šklovského ‘Theorie prózy’.” Listy pro umění a kritiku 2.5 (1934): 111–15.Search in Google Scholar

Wellek, René. “The Theory of Literary History.” Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 6 (1935): 173–91.Search in Google Scholar

Wellek, René. “Vývoj anglické literární historie.” Slovo a slovesnost 4.1 (1938): 96–105.Search in Google Scholar

Wellek, René, and Austin Warren. Theory of Literature. Michigan, IN: Cape, 1949. Search in Google Scholar

Wollman, Frank. Slovesnost Slovanů. Prague: Vesmír, 1928.Search in Google Scholar

Zelenka, Miloš. Literární věda a slavistika. Prague: Academia, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2025-11-05
Published in Print: 2025-11-04

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/arcadia-2025-2020/html
Scroll to top button