Home Do risk factors for elective cesarean section differ from those of cesarean section during labor in low risk pregnancies?
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Do risk factors for elective cesarean section differ from those of cesarean section during labor in low risk pregnancies?

  • Horace Roman , Béatrice Blondel , Gérard Bréart and François Goffinet
Published/Copyright: May 19, 2008

Abstract

Aims: As the rate of cesarean sections has continuously increased over the last three decades, we sought to identify the factors related to elective cesarean section (ECS) and cesarean section during labor (LCS) in low risk pregnancies and to determine if they differ for the two types of cesarean.

Methods: We conducted an observational study that included all maternity units in metropolitan France. Using the sample from the National Perinatal Survey 2003, we included 5393 women who met the criteria of a low risk pregnancy. The odds ratios (OR) corresponding to ECS and LCS were calculated for various characteristics for the women, fetus and maternity units, using a multinomial logistic regression model. For each factor, the adjusted OR corresponding to ECS and LCS were compared using the Wald's test.

Results: The rates of ECS and LCS in our population were 2.9% and 4.3%, respectively. Maternal age ≥30 years, body mass index ≥25 kg/m2, primiparity and nationality from an African country were associated with an increased risk for both ECS and LCS. Those maternity units registering a low volume of deliveries (<1000/year) and those with a high rate of cesarean section during the previous year had an increased rate of LCS.

Conclusion: Women with low risk pregnancies at term may present several factors that appear to create an “environment” favorable for cesarean section, leading to an increase in the likelihood of both ECS and LCS. Furthermore, several characteristics concerning maternity units are associated with an increased likelihood of LCS. Understanding the impact of various factors on the decision about the mode of delivery is essential for obstetrical teams concerned with controlling the progressive increase in the rate of cesarean sections.


Corresponding author: Dr. Horace Roman INSERM, UMR S149 Epidemiological Research Unit on Perinatal Health and Women's Health 82 rue Denfert Rochereau Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6 F-75014 Paris France

Received: 2007-10-31
Revised: 2008-1-24
Accepted: 2008-3-18
Published Online: 2008-05-19
Published Online: 2008-5-24
Published in Print: 2008-07-01

©2008 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Editorial
  2. Does globalization and change demand a different kind of perinatal research?
  3. Recommendations and guidelines for perinatal practice
  4. Intrauterine restriction (IUGR)
  5. Review article
  6. The role of antioxidant vitamins in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
  7. Original articles – Obstetrics
  8. The fetus, not the mother, elicits maternal immunologic rejection: lessons from discordant dizygotic twin placentas
  9. Do risk factors for elective cesarean section differ from those of cesarean section during labor in low risk pregnancies?
  10. Obstetric antecedents for preterm delivery
  11. Post-delivery oxidative stress in women with preeclampsia or IUGR
  12. Evidence supporting proteolytic cleavage of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) protein in amniotic fluid
  13. Original articles – Fetus
  14. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population
  15. Comparison of six sonographic signs in the prenatal diagnosis of spina bifida
  16. Original articles – Newborn
  17. Relationships between umbilical cord arterial blood pH levels at delivery and Bayley Psychomotor Development Index scores in early childhood
  18. Head circumference and long-term outcome in small-for-gestational age infants
  19. Hypocalcemia is common in the first 48 h of life in ELBW infants
  20. Total body water in small- and appropriate- for gestational age newborns
  21. Below median birth weight in appropriate-for-gestational-age preterm infants as a risk factor for bronchopulmonary dysplasia
  22. Letter to the editor
  23. Congenital lupus erythematosus affecting both twins
  24. Obituary Gösta Rooth
  25. The death of Prof. Gösta Rooth
  26. Erratum
  27. Hematological profile of Korean very low birth weight infants
  28. Congress Calander
  29. Congress Calendar
  30. Announcement
  31. Announcement
Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/JPM.2008.044/html
Scroll to top button