Home History Borders and Neo-Nationalism: A Geophilosophical Approach
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Borders and Neo-Nationalism: A Geophilosophical Approach

  • Rita Fulco
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

My paper explores borders and neo-nationalism from a geo-philosophical perspective. In this approach, philosophy actively engages with other disciplines while consistently focusing on man’s dwelling in the world. First, I deconstruct the concept of ‘border,’ interpreted as an insurmountable barrier, as an immune dispositif aimed at protecting property and identity. Secondly, I will address the issue of neo-nationalism from Simone Weil’s reflections on patriotism in the 1930s and 1940s. In some of her writings from the 1940s, Weil offers a sharp critique of patriotism and attempts to rethink the concept of homeland and citizenship in a universalist sense. We know that globalisation has initiated an oscillation between de-localisation and re-localisation. However, considering only one of the two tendencies would fail to grasp the complexity of the issues at stake. On the other hand, any attempt to deny these opposing tendencies would be short-sighted. I aim to explore new ways to organise vast global spaces without reinforcing national sovereignty. I am convinced that we should move towards a universalism in which neither homologation nor immunisation from otherness prevails, a universalism that is, instead, based on recognising and respecting differences, not excluding, but, on the contrary, increasingly inclusive.

Abstract

My paper explores borders and neo-nationalism from a geo-philosophical perspective. In this approach, philosophy actively engages with other disciplines while consistently focusing on man’s dwelling in the world. First, I deconstruct the concept of ‘border,’ interpreted as an insurmountable barrier, as an immune dispositif aimed at protecting property and identity. Secondly, I will address the issue of neo-nationalism from Simone Weil’s reflections on patriotism in the 1930s and 1940s. In some of her writings from the 1940s, Weil offers a sharp critique of patriotism and attempts to rethink the concept of homeland and citizenship in a universalist sense. We know that globalisation has initiated an oscillation between de-localisation and re-localisation. However, considering only one of the two tendencies would fail to grasp the complexity of the issues at stake. On the other hand, any attempt to deny these opposing tendencies would be short-sighted. I aim to explore new ways to organise vast global spaces without reinforcing national sovereignty. I am convinced that we should move towards a universalism in which neither homologation nor immunisation from otherness prevails, a universalism that is, instead, based on recognising and respecting differences, not excluding, but, on the contrary, increasingly inclusive.

Downloaded on 30.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111448473-004/html
Scroll to top button