Home The C/D Model and Prosodic Control of Articulatory Behavior
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The C/D Model and Prosodic Control of Articulatory Behavior

  • Osamu Fujimura
Published/Copyright: August 22, 2000

Abstract

The Converter and Distributor (C/D) model is a generative description of articulatory gesture organization for utterances. Its input comprises specifications for syllables by features, a paraphonologically augmented metrical structure, and system parameters for utterance conditions. A syllable-boundary pulse train is computed as a time function representing the skeletal rhythmic structure of the utterance. Control functions for articulators are computed by superimposing consonantal elemental gestures onto the base function, which includes voicing, vocalic, mandibular, and tonal functions associated with the pulse train. A preliminary analysis of microbeam data for experimental dialogues, using jaw opening as an approximate measure of the syllable magnitude, inferred syllable and boundary durations consistently with durational characteristics observed in the acoustic waveform.


verified


References

1 Archangeli, D.: Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology 5: 183–205 (1988).10.1017/S0952675700002268Search in Google Scholar

2 Browman, C.P.; Goldstein, L.M.: Articulatory phonology: an overview. Phonetica 49: 155–180 (1992).10.1159/000261913Search in Google Scholar

3 Crystal, T.; House, A.S.: A note on the durations of American English consonants; in Kiritani, Hirose, Fujisaki, Speech production and language, pp. 195–213 (Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin 1997).Search in Google Scholar

4 Erickson, D.: Effects of contrastive emphasis on jaw opening. Phonetica 55: 147–169 (1998).10.1159/000028429Search in Google Scholar

5 Erickson, D.; Fujimura, O.; Dang, J.: Emphasized versus unemphasized /aJ/: jaw, tongue, and formants. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 105: 1354 (1999).Search in Google Scholar

6 Erickson, D.; Fujimura, O.; Pardo, B.: Articulatory correlates of prosodic control: emotion and emphasis. Lang. Speech 41: 395–413 (1998).10.1177/002383099804100408Search in Google Scholar

7 Firth, J.R.: Sounds and prosodies. Trans. Philol. Soc. 1948: 127–152; also in Firth, J.R.: Papers in linguistics, 1934–1951, pp. 121–138 (Oxford University Press, London 1957).Search in Google Scholar

8 Fujimura, O.: Relative invariance of articulatory movements; in Perkell, Klatt, Invariance and variability in speech processes, pp. 226–242 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale 1986).Search in Google Scholar

9 Fujimura, O.: Methods and goals of speech production research. Lang. Speech 33: 195–258 (1990).10.1177/002383099003300301Search in Google Scholar

10 Fujimura, O.: C/D model: a computational model of phonetic implementation; in Ristad, Language computations, DIMACS Ser. in Discrete Mathematics and Theoret. Computer Sci., Vol. 17, pp. 1–20 (American Mathematical Society, Providence1994).10.1090/dimacs/017/01Search in Google Scholar

11 Fujimura, O.: Syllable structure constraints: a C/D model perspective; in Agbayani, Harada, Proc. SWOT-II, Working Papers in Ling., University of California, Irvine, pp. 59–74 (Department of Linguistics, University of California, Irvine 1996a).Search in Google Scholar

12 Fujimura, O.: Iceberg revisited. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 99: 2aSC (1996b).10.1121/1.415536Search in Google Scholar

13 Fujimura, O.: Neuromuscular simulation and linguistic control. Bull. Commun. parlée 4: 59–63 (1998).Search in Google Scholar

14 Fujimura, O.; Erickson, D.: Acoustic phonetics; in Hardcastle, Laver, Handbook of phonetic sciences, pp. 64–115 (Blackwell, Oxford 1997).Search in Google Scholar

15 Fujimura, O.; Lovins, J.B.: Syllables as concatenative phonetic units; in Bell, Hooper, Syllables and segments, pp. 107–120 (North Holland, Amsterdam 1978).Search in Google Scholar

16 Fujimura, O.; Pardo, B.; Erickson, D.: Effect of emphasis and irritation on jaw opening; in Duez, Proc. ESCA/ SPoSS, pp. 23–29 (1998).Search in Google Scholar

17 Fujimura, O.; Williams, J.C.: Syllable concatenators in English, Japanese and Spanish; in Fujimura, Joseph, Palek, Item order: Proc. LP’98, pp. 461–498 (Charles University Press, Prague, 1999).Search in Google Scholar

18 Halle, M.; Idsardi, W.: General properties of stress and metrical structure; in Goldsmith, Handbook of phonological theory, pp. 403–443 (Blackwell, Oxford 1995).Search in Google Scholar

19 Haraguchi, S.: A theory of syllables; in Fujimura, Joseph, Palek, Item order: Proc. LP’98, pp. 691–715 (Charles University Press, Prague, 1999).Search in Google Scholar

20 Hayes, B.: The phonology of rhythm in English. Ling. Inquiry 15: 33–74 (1984).Itô, J.; Mester, A.; Padgett, J.: Licensing and underspecification in optimality theory. Ling. Inquiry 26: 571–613 (1995).Search in Google Scholar

21 Keating, P.: Segmental phonology and non-segmental phonetics. Proc. 13th Int. Congr. Phonet. Sci., Vol. 3, pp. 26–32, Stockholm 1995).Search in Google Scholar

22 Kohler, K.: Segmental reduction in connected speech in German: phonological facts and phonetic explanations; in Hardcastle, Marchal, Speech production and speech modelling, pp. 69–92 (Kluwer, Dordrecht 1990).10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_4Search in Google Scholar

23 Krakow, R.A.: Physiological organization of syllables: a review. J. Phonet. 27: 23–54 (1999).10.1006/jpho.1999.0089Search in Google Scholar

24 Leben, W.: Weak vowels and vowel sequences in Kwa: sounds that phonology can’t handle; in Fujimura, Joseph, Palek, Item order: Proc. LP’98, pp. 717–732 (Charles University Press, Prague, 1999).Search in Google Scholar

25 Lehiste, I.: Suprasegmentals (MIT Press, Cambridge 1970).Search in Google Scholar

26 Levelt, W.J.M.: Speaking: from intention to articulation (MIT Press, Cambridge 1989).Search in Google Scholar

27 Levelt. W.J.M.; Roelofs, A.; Meyer, A.S.: A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behav. Brain Sci., 22: 1–75 (1999).10.1017/S0140525X99451775Search in Google Scholar

28 Liberman, M.; Prince, A.: On stress and linguistic rhythm. Ling. Inquiry 8: 249–336 (1977).Search in Google Scholar

29 Lindblom, B.: Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 35: 1773–1781 (1963).10.1121/1.1918816Search in Google Scholar

30 Lindblom, B.: Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H and H theory; in Hardcastle, Marchal, Speech production and speech modeling, pp. 403–440 (Kluwer, Dordrecht 1990).10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_16Search in Google Scholar

31 Maeda, S.: Articulatory modeling of the vocal tract. J. Physique 4: 307–314 (1992).Öhman, S.E.G.: Numerical model of coarticulation. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 39: 151–168 (1967).Search in Google Scholar

32 Prince, A.: Relating to the grid. Ling. Inquiry 14: 19–100 (1983).Search in Google Scholar

33 Sproat, R.; Fujimura, O.: Allophonic variation in English /l/ and its implications for phonetic implementation. J. Phonet. 21: 291–311 (1993).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31340-3Search in Google Scholar

34 Steriade, D.: Underspecifications and markedness; in Goldsmith, Handbook of phonological theory, pp. 114–174 (Blackwell, Oxford 1994).Search in Google Scholar

35 Umeda, N.: Consonant duration in American English. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 59: 434–444 (1977).Search in Google Scholar

36 Wilhelms-Tricarico, R.: Physiological modeling of speech production: methods for modeling soft-tissue articulators. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 97: 3085–3098 (1995)10.1121/1.411871Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2000-08-22
Published in Print: 2000-12-01

© 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Special Section
  2. Title Page
  3. Foreword
  4. Acoustic Patterning of Speech Its Linguistic and Physiological Bases
  5. Investigating Unscripted Speech: Implications for Phonetics and Phonology
  6. Emotive Transforms
  7. The Source-Filter Frame of Prominence
  8. The C/D Model and Prosodic Control of Articulatory Behavior
  9. Diverse Acoustic Cues at Consonantal Landmarks
  10. Perceptual Processing
  11. Modeling and Perception of ‘Gesture Reduction’
  12. General Auditory Processes Contribute to Perceptual Accommodation of Coarticulation
  13. Adaptive Dispersion in Vowel Perception
  14. Language Acquisition as Complex Category Formation
  15. Biology of Communication and Motor Processes
  16. Singing Birds, Playing Cats, and Babbling Babies: Why Do They Do It?
  17. The Phonetic Potential of Nonhuman Vocal Tracts: Comparative Cineradiographic Observations of Vocalizing Animals
  18. Dynamic Simulation of Human Movement Using Large-Scale Models of the Body
  19. En Route to Adult Spoken Language / Language Development
  20. An Embodiment Perspective on the Acquisition of Speech Perception
  21. Speech to Infants as Hyperspeech: Knowledge-Driven Processes in Early Word Recognition
  22. The Construction of a First Phonology
  23. Auditory Constraints on Sound Structures
  24. Searching for an Auditory Description of Vowel Categories
  25. Commentary
  26. Imitation and the Emergence of Segments
  27. Deriving Speech from Nonspeech: A View from Ontogeny
  28. Paper
  29. Developmental Origins of Adult Phonology: The Interplay between Phonetic Emergents and the Evolutionary Adaptations of Sound Patterns
  30. Further Section
  31. Publications Björn Lindblom
  32. Index autorum Vol. 57, 2000
  33. Contents Vol. 57, 2000
Downloaded on 10.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1159/000028467/html
Scroll to top button